Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes

Yun-Jae Kim, Do Jun Shim, Nam Su Huh, Young Jin Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimised reference load. Using 38 published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons are fully discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-191
Number of pages19
JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fracture mechanics
Pipe
Plastics
Cracks
Load limits
Loads (forces)

Keywords

  • Circumferential through-thickness crack
  • Failure assessment diagram
  • J-integral
  • Maximum instability load
  • Part circumferential internal surface crack
  • Pipe test data
  • Reference stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes. / Kim, Yun-Jae; Shim, Do Jun; Huh, Nam Su; Kim, Young Jin.

In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 71, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 173-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Yun-Jae ; Shim, Do Jun ; Huh, Nam Su ; Kim, Young Jin. / Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2004 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 173-191.
@article{2131153be44d466390eea7d3b4dccfe9,
title = "Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes",
abstract = "This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimised reference load. Using 38 published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons are fully discussed.",
keywords = "Circumferential through-thickness crack, Failure assessment diagram, J-integral, Maximum instability load, Part circumferential internal surface crack, Pipe test data, Reference stress",
author = "Yun-Jae Kim and Shim, {Do Jun} and Huh, {Nam Su} and Kim, {Young Jin}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00095-X",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "173--191",
journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",
issn = "0013-7944",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics assessment of test data for circumferential cracked pipes

AU - Kim, Yun-Jae

AU - Shim, Do Jun

AU - Huh, Nam Su

AU - Kim, Young Jin

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimised reference load. Using 38 published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons are fully discussed.

AB - This paper presents experimental validation of two reference stress based methods for circumferential cracked pipes. One is the R6 method where the reference stress is defined by the plastic limit load. The other is the enhanced reference stress method, recently proposed by the authors, where the reference stress is defined by the optimised reference load. Using 38 published pipe test data, the predicted maximum instability loads according to both methods are compared with the experimental ones for pipes with circumferential through-thickness cracks and with part circumferential surface cracks. It is found that the R6 method gives conservative estimates of the maximum loads for all cases. Ratios of the experimental maximum load to the predicted load range from 0.54 to 0.98. On the other hand, the proposed method gives overall closer maximum loads than R6, compared to the experimental data. However, for part through-thickness surface cracks, the estimated loads were slightly non-conservative for four cases, and possible reasons are fully discussed.

KW - Circumferential through-thickness crack

KW - Failure assessment diagram

KW - J-integral

KW - Maximum instability load

KW - Part circumferential internal surface crack

KW - Pipe test data

KW - Reference stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142153751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142153751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00095-X

DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00095-X

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 173

EP - 191

JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

SN - 0013-7944

IS - 2

ER -