Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity

An online evaluation

C. Vidaurre, A. Ramos Murguialday, S. Haufe, M. Gómez, Klaus Muller, V. V. Nikulin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An important goal in Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI) is to find and enhance procedural strategies for users for whom BCI control is not sufficiently accurate. To address this challenge, we conducted offline analyses and online experiments to test whether the classification of different types of motor imagery could be improved when the training of the classifier was performed on the data obtained with the assistive muscular stimulation below the motor threshold. 10 healthy participants underwent three different types of experimental conditions: a) Motor imagery (MI) of hands and feet b) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM) of hands and feet while resting and c) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation during performance of motor imagery (BOTH). Also, another group of 10 participants underwent conditions a) and c). Then, online experiments with 15 users were performed. These subjects received neurofeedback during MI using classifiers calibrated either on MI or BOTH data recorded in the same experiment. Offline analyses showed that decoding MI alone using a classifier based on BOTH resulted in a better BCI accuracy compared to using a classifier based on MI alone. Online experiments confirmed accuracy improvement of MI alone being decoded with the classifier trained on BOTH data. In addition, we observed that the performance in MI condition could be predicted on the basis of a more pronounced connectivity within sensorimotor areas in the frequency bands providing the best performance in BOTH. These finding might offer a new avenue for training SMR-based BCI systems particularly for users having difficulties to achieve efficient BCI control. It might also be an alternative strategy for users who cannot perform real movements but still have remaining afferent pathways (e.g., ALS and stroke patients).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-386
Number of pages12
JournalNeuroImage
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Brain
Sensory Thresholds
Electric Stimulation
Foot
Hand
Neurofeedback
Afferent Pathways
Computer Systems
Healthy Volunteers
Stroke

Keywords

  • Afferent patterns
  • Brain-computer interfacing (BCI) inefficiency
  • Efferent patterns
  • Motor imagery (MI)
  • Sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Vidaurre, C., Ramos Murguialday, A., Haufe, S., Gómez, M., Muller, K., & Nikulin, V. V. (2019). Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity: An online evaluation. NeuroImage, 199, 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074

Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity : An online evaluation. / Vidaurre, C.; Ramos Murguialday, A.; Haufe, S.; Gómez, M.; Muller, Klaus; Nikulin, V. V.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 199, 01.10.2019, p. 375-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vidaurre, C, Ramos Murguialday, A, Haufe, S, Gómez, M, Muller, K & Nikulin, VV 2019, 'Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity: An online evaluation', NeuroImage, vol. 199, pp. 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074
Vidaurre C, Ramos Murguialday A, Haufe S, Gómez M, Muller K, Nikulin VV. Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity: An online evaluation. NeuroImage. 2019 Oct 1;199:375-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074
Vidaurre, C. ; Ramos Murguialday, A. ; Haufe, S. ; Gómez, M. ; Muller, Klaus ; Nikulin, V. V. / Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity : An online evaluation. In: NeuroImage. 2019 ; Vol. 199. pp. 375-386.
@article{d18365fa71b04469aa46940df5f963bb,
title = "Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity: An online evaluation",
abstract = "An important goal in Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI) is to find and enhance procedural strategies for users for whom BCI control is not sufficiently accurate. To address this challenge, we conducted offline analyses and online experiments to test whether the classification of different types of motor imagery could be improved when the training of the classifier was performed on the data obtained with the assistive muscular stimulation below the motor threshold. 10 healthy participants underwent three different types of experimental conditions: a) Motor imagery (MI) of hands and feet b) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM) of hands and feet while resting and c) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation during performance of motor imagery (BOTH). Also, another group of 10 participants underwent conditions a) and c). Then, online experiments with 15 users were performed. These subjects received neurofeedback during MI using classifiers calibrated either on MI or BOTH data recorded in the same experiment. Offline analyses showed that decoding MI alone using a classifier based on BOTH resulted in a better BCI accuracy compared to using a classifier based on MI alone. Online experiments confirmed accuracy improvement of MI alone being decoded with the classifier trained on BOTH data. In addition, we observed that the performance in MI condition could be predicted on the basis of a more pronounced connectivity within sensorimotor areas in the frequency bands providing the best performance in BOTH. These finding might offer a new avenue for training SMR-based BCI systems particularly for users having difficulties to achieve efficient BCI control. It might also be an alternative strategy for users who cannot perform real movements but still have remaining afferent pathways (e.g., ALS and stroke patients).",
keywords = "Afferent patterns, Brain-computer interfacing (BCI) inefficiency, Efferent patterns, Motor imagery (MI), Sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM)",
author = "C. Vidaurre and {Ramos Murguialday}, A. and S. Haufe and M. G{\'o}mez and Klaus Muller and Nikulin, {V. V.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "375--386",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing sensorimotor BCI performance with assistive afferent activity

T2 - An online evaluation

AU - Vidaurre, C.

AU - Ramos Murguialday, A.

AU - Haufe, S.

AU - Gómez, M.

AU - Muller, Klaus

AU - Nikulin, V. V.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - An important goal in Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI) is to find and enhance procedural strategies for users for whom BCI control is not sufficiently accurate. To address this challenge, we conducted offline analyses and online experiments to test whether the classification of different types of motor imagery could be improved when the training of the classifier was performed on the data obtained with the assistive muscular stimulation below the motor threshold. 10 healthy participants underwent three different types of experimental conditions: a) Motor imagery (MI) of hands and feet b) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM) of hands and feet while resting and c) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation during performance of motor imagery (BOTH). Also, another group of 10 participants underwent conditions a) and c). Then, online experiments with 15 users were performed. These subjects received neurofeedback during MI using classifiers calibrated either on MI or BOTH data recorded in the same experiment. Offline analyses showed that decoding MI alone using a classifier based on BOTH resulted in a better BCI accuracy compared to using a classifier based on MI alone. Online experiments confirmed accuracy improvement of MI alone being decoded with the classifier trained on BOTH data. In addition, we observed that the performance in MI condition could be predicted on the basis of a more pronounced connectivity within sensorimotor areas in the frequency bands providing the best performance in BOTH. These finding might offer a new avenue for training SMR-based BCI systems particularly for users having difficulties to achieve efficient BCI control. It might also be an alternative strategy for users who cannot perform real movements but still have remaining afferent pathways (e.g., ALS and stroke patients).

AB - An important goal in Brain-Computer Interfacing (BCI) is to find and enhance procedural strategies for users for whom BCI control is not sufficiently accurate. To address this challenge, we conducted offline analyses and online experiments to test whether the classification of different types of motor imagery could be improved when the training of the classifier was performed on the data obtained with the assistive muscular stimulation below the motor threshold. 10 healthy participants underwent three different types of experimental conditions: a) Motor imagery (MI) of hands and feet b) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM) of hands and feet while resting and c) sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation during performance of motor imagery (BOTH). Also, another group of 10 participants underwent conditions a) and c). Then, online experiments with 15 users were performed. These subjects received neurofeedback during MI using classifiers calibrated either on MI or BOTH data recorded in the same experiment. Offline analyses showed that decoding MI alone using a classifier based on BOTH resulted in a better BCI accuracy compared to using a classifier based on MI alone. Online experiments confirmed accuracy improvement of MI alone being decoded with the classifier trained on BOTH data. In addition, we observed that the performance in MI condition could be predicted on the basis of a more pronounced connectivity within sensorimotor areas in the frequency bands providing the best performance in BOTH. These finding might offer a new avenue for training SMR-based BCI systems particularly for users having difficulties to achieve efficient BCI control. It might also be an alternative strategy for users who cannot perform real movements but still have remaining afferent pathways (e.g., ALS and stroke patients).

KW - Afferent patterns

KW - Brain-computer interfacing (BCI) inefficiency

KW - Efferent patterns

KW - Motor imagery (MI)

KW - Sensory threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation (STM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067109507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067109507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.074

M3 - Article

VL - 199

SP - 375

EP - 386

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -