Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma: An initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea

Joon Il Choi, Pyo Nyun Kim, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Hyun Cheol Kim, Dal Mo Yang, Sang Hoon Cha, Jae Joon Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ultrasound (US) device testing using a US phantom and to determine cutoff values for phantom quality assurance tests in US examinations for the screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Methods-Ultrasound phantom images were acquired from the general hospitals in Korea that participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound images of the phantom were acquired with a 3.0- to 5.0-MHz convex transducer and evaluated in terms of the dead zone, vertical and horizontal measurement, axial and lateral resolution, sensitivity, and gray scale/dynamic range. Appropriate cutoff values were determined to guarantee minimal qualifications for the performance of the US scanners. Results-Three hundred fifty-seven US scanners were tested using the following cutoff values: less than 2 mm for the dead zone, 5% discrepancy in the vertical measurement, 7.5% discrepancy in the horizontal measurement, all 11 identifiable line targets for axial and lateral resolution, more than 14 cm for sensitivity, and more than 4 cylindrical structures for gray scale/dynamic range. With these criteria, 283 US scanners (79.3%) passed the tests. The most common cause of disqualification was the dynamic range/gray scale. No statistical difference was observed in the disqualification rate between 3 groups based on different years of manufacture. Conclusions-Through this study, we have defined cutoff values for phantom images acquired with US scanners. These will be used in performing screening US examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1221-1229
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Korea
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Transducers
Early Detection of Cancer
General Hospitals
Equipment and Supplies
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Phantom
  • Quality assurance
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma : An initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea. / Choi, Joon Il; Kim, Pyo Nyun; Jeong, Woo Kyoung; Kim, Hyun Cheol; Yang, Dal Mo; Cha, Sang Hoon; Chung, Jae Joon.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.09.2011, p. 1221-1229.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{60e66c14d8394f63b1c4ca6d596e66a0,
title = "Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma: An initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea",
abstract = "Objectives-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ultrasound (US) device testing using a US phantom and to determine cutoff values for phantom quality assurance tests in US examinations for the screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Methods-Ultrasound phantom images were acquired from the general hospitals in Korea that participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound images of the phantom were acquired with a 3.0- to 5.0-MHz convex transducer and evaluated in terms of the dead zone, vertical and horizontal measurement, axial and lateral resolution, sensitivity, and gray scale/dynamic range. Appropriate cutoff values were determined to guarantee minimal qualifications for the performance of the US scanners. Results-Three hundred fifty-seven US scanners were tested using the following cutoff values: less than 2 mm for the dead zone, 5{\%} discrepancy in the vertical measurement, 7.5{\%} discrepancy in the horizontal measurement, all 11 identifiable line targets for axial and lateral resolution, more than 14 cm for sensitivity, and more than 4 cylindrical structures for gray scale/dynamic range. With these criteria, 283 US scanners (79.3{\%}) passed the tests. The most common cause of disqualification was the dynamic range/gray scale. No statistical difference was observed in the disqualification rate between 3 groups based on different years of manufacture. Conclusions-Through this study, we have defined cutoff values for phantom images acquired with US scanners. These will be used in performing screening US examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.",
keywords = "Hepatocellular carcinoma, Phantom, Quality assurance, Ultrasound",
author = "Choi, {Joon Il} and Kim, {Pyo Nyun} and Jeong, {Woo Kyoung} and Kim, {Hyun Cheol} and Yang, {Dal Mo} and Cha, {Sang Hoon} and Chung, {Jae Joon}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1221",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1221--1229",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma

T2 - An initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea

AU - Choi, Joon Il

AU - Kim, Pyo Nyun

AU - Jeong, Woo Kyoung

AU - Kim, Hyun Cheol

AU - Yang, Dal Mo

AU - Cha, Sang Hoon

AU - Chung, Jae Joon

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Objectives-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ultrasound (US) device testing using a US phantom and to determine cutoff values for phantom quality assurance tests in US examinations for the screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Methods-Ultrasound phantom images were acquired from the general hospitals in Korea that participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound images of the phantom were acquired with a 3.0- to 5.0-MHz convex transducer and evaluated in terms of the dead zone, vertical and horizontal measurement, axial and lateral resolution, sensitivity, and gray scale/dynamic range. Appropriate cutoff values were determined to guarantee minimal qualifications for the performance of the US scanners. Results-Three hundred fifty-seven US scanners were tested using the following cutoff values: less than 2 mm for the dead zone, 5% discrepancy in the vertical measurement, 7.5% discrepancy in the horizontal measurement, all 11 identifiable line targets for axial and lateral resolution, more than 14 cm for sensitivity, and more than 4 cylindrical structures for gray scale/dynamic range. With these criteria, 283 US scanners (79.3%) passed the tests. The most common cause of disqualification was the dynamic range/gray scale. No statistical difference was observed in the disqualification rate between 3 groups based on different years of manufacture. Conclusions-Through this study, we have defined cutoff values for phantom images acquired with US scanners. These will be used in performing screening US examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.

AB - Objectives-The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of ultrasound (US) device testing using a US phantom and to determine cutoff values for phantom quality assurance tests in US examinations for the screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea. Methods-Ultrasound phantom images were acquired from the general hospitals in Korea that participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasound images of the phantom were acquired with a 3.0- to 5.0-MHz convex transducer and evaluated in terms of the dead zone, vertical and horizontal measurement, axial and lateral resolution, sensitivity, and gray scale/dynamic range. Appropriate cutoff values were determined to guarantee minimal qualifications for the performance of the US scanners. Results-Three hundred fifty-seven US scanners were tested using the following cutoff values: less than 2 mm for the dead zone, 5% discrepancy in the vertical measurement, 7.5% discrepancy in the horizontal measurement, all 11 identifiable line targets for axial and lateral resolution, more than 14 cm for sensitivity, and more than 4 cylindrical structures for gray scale/dynamic range. With these criteria, 283 US scanners (79.3%) passed the tests. The most common cause of disqualification was the dynamic range/gray scale. No statistical difference was observed in the disqualification rate between 3 groups based on different years of manufacture. Conclusions-Through this study, we have defined cutoff values for phantom images acquired with US scanners. These will be used in performing screening US examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.

KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma

KW - Phantom

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052464795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052464795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1221

DO - 10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1221

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21876093

AN - SCOPUS:80052464795

VL - 30

SP - 1221

EP - 1229

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 9

ER -