European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments

Lynn Van Wezemael, Vincenzina Caputo, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, George Chryssochoidis, Wim Verbeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) nutrition labelling policy aims to facilitate consumers' food choice, stimulate innovation and facilitate the circulation of foods bearing claims across countries. However, the beef industry has not fully taken advantage of utilizing nutrition and health claims based on the EU nutrition labelling policy to differentiate beef products in the market. This study investigates consumer preferences for nutrition and health claims on lean beef steak. Two choice experiments were conducted among 2400 beef consumers in four EU countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, United and United Kingdom). Multinomial logit and error component models were estimated. Our results generally suggest that consumer valuation of nutritional and health claims varies across countries. In Belgium, the Netherlands and France, nutrition and health claims on saturated fat yielded higher utilities than claims on protein and/or iron, while the opposite was found among consumers in the UK. The results imply that marketing opportunities related to nutrition and health claims on beef are promising, but that different nutritional marketing strategies are necessary within different countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-176
Number of pages10
JournalFood Policy
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Feb 1

Fingerprint

health and nutrition
health claims
consumer preferences
nutrition
beef
European Union
Food Labeling
experiment
nutrition labeling
Health
Nutrition Policy
health
Belgium
marketing
Marketing
Netherlands
France
food
beef industry
Food

Keywords

  • Beef
  • Choice experiment
  • Claims
  • Consumer
  • Health
  • Logit
  • Nutrition
  • Preference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims : A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. / Van Wezemael, Lynn; Caputo, Vincenzina; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.; Chryssochoidis, George; Verbeke, Wim.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 44, 01.02.2014, p. 167-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Wezemael, Lynn ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M. ; Chryssochoidis, George ; Verbeke, Wim. / European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims : A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. In: Food Policy. 2014 ; Vol. 44. pp. 167-176.
@article{e455736dd6c74f94bbf580516ba8250b,
title = "European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments",
abstract = "The European Union (EU) nutrition labelling policy aims to facilitate consumers' food choice, stimulate innovation and facilitate the circulation of foods bearing claims across countries. However, the beef industry has not fully taken advantage of utilizing nutrition and health claims based on the EU nutrition labelling policy to differentiate beef products in the market. This study investigates consumer preferences for nutrition and health claims on lean beef steak. Two choice experiments were conducted among 2400 beef consumers in four EU countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, United and United Kingdom). Multinomial logit and error component models were estimated. Our results generally suggest that consumer valuation of nutritional and health claims varies across countries. In Belgium, the Netherlands and France, nutrition and health claims on saturated fat yielded higher utilities than claims on protein and/or iron, while the opposite was found among consumers in the UK. The results imply that marketing opportunities related to nutrition and health claims on beef are promising, but that different nutritional marketing strategies are necessary within different countries.",
keywords = "Beef, Choice experiment, Claims, Consumer, Health, Logit, Nutrition, Preference",
author = "{Van Wezemael}, Lynn and Vincenzina Caputo and {Nayga, Jr}, {Rodolfo M.} and George Chryssochoidis and Wim Verbeke",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "167--176",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims

T2 - A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments

AU - Van Wezemael, Lynn

AU - Caputo, Vincenzina

AU - Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.

AU - Chryssochoidis, George

AU - Verbeke, Wim

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - The European Union (EU) nutrition labelling policy aims to facilitate consumers' food choice, stimulate innovation and facilitate the circulation of foods bearing claims across countries. However, the beef industry has not fully taken advantage of utilizing nutrition and health claims based on the EU nutrition labelling policy to differentiate beef products in the market. This study investigates consumer preferences for nutrition and health claims on lean beef steak. Two choice experiments were conducted among 2400 beef consumers in four EU countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, United and United Kingdom). Multinomial logit and error component models were estimated. Our results generally suggest that consumer valuation of nutritional and health claims varies across countries. In Belgium, the Netherlands and France, nutrition and health claims on saturated fat yielded higher utilities than claims on protein and/or iron, while the opposite was found among consumers in the UK. The results imply that marketing opportunities related to nutrition and health claims on beef are promising, but that different nutritional marketing strategies are necessary within different countries.

AB - The European Union (EU) nutrition labelling policy aims to facilitate consumers' food choice, stimulate innovation and facilitate the circulation of foods bearing claims across countries. However, the beef industry has not fully taken advantage of utilizing nutrition and health claims based on the EU nutrition labelling policy to differentiate beef products in the market. This study investigates consumer preferences for nutrition and health claims on lean beef steak. Two choice experiments were conducted among 2400 beef consumers in four EU countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, United and United Kingdom). Multinomial logit and error component models were estimated. Our results generally suggest that consumer valuation of nutritional and health claims varies across countries. In Belgium, the Netherlands and France, nutrition and health claims on saturated fat yielded higher utilities than claims on protein and/or iron, while the opposite was found among consumers in the UK. The results imply that marketing opportunities related to nutrition and health claims on beef are promising, but that different nutritional marketing strategies are necessary within different countries.

KW - Beef

KW - Choice experiment

KW - Claims

KW - Consumer

KW - Health

KW - Logit

KW - Nutrition

KW - Preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891352284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891352284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891352284

VL - 44

SP - 167

EP - 176

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

ER -