Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning

J. Steven Brown, Yong Chan Kim, Piotr A. Domanski

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares the performance of CO 2 and R-22 in residential air-conditioning applications using semi-theoretical vapor compression and transcritical cycle models. The simulated R-22 system had a conventional component configuration, while the CO 2 system also included a liquid-line/suction-line heat exchanger. The CO 2 evaporator and gas cooler were microchannel heat exchangers originally designed for CO 2. The R-22 heat exchangers employed the same microchannel heat exchangers as CO 2 with the difference that we modified the refrigerant passages to obtain reasonable pressure drops. The study covers several heat exchanger sizes. The R-22 system had a significantly better coefficient of performance (COP) than the CO 2 system when equivalent heat exchangers were used in the CO 2 and R-22 systems, which indicates that the better transport properties and compressor isentropic efficiency of CO 2 did not compensate for the thermodynamic disadvantage of the transcritical cycle in comfort cooling applications. An entropy generation analysis showed that the CO 2 evaporator operated with fewer irreversibilities than did the R-22 evaporator. However, the CO 2 gas cooler and expansion device generated more entropy than their R-22 counterparts and were mainly responsible for the low COP of the CO 2 system.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationASHRAE Transactions
Pages954-963
Number of pages10
Volume108 PART 2
Publication statusPublished - 2002
EventASHRAE Transactions 2002 - Honolulu, HI, United States
Duration: 2002 Jun 222002 Jun 26

Other

OtherASHRAE Transactions 2002
CountryUnited States
CityHonolulu, HI
Period02/6/2202/6/26

Fingerprint

Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Air conditioning
Heat exchangers
Carbon dioxide
Evaporators
Microchannels
Entropy
Refrigerants
Gases
Transport properties
Pressure drop
Compressors
Vapors
Thermodynamics
Cooling
Liquids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

Cite this

Brown, J. S., Kim, Y. C., & Domanski, P. A. (2002). Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning. In ASHRAE Transactions (Vol. 108 PART 2, pp. 954-963)

Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning. / Brown, J. Steven; Kim, Yong Chan; Domanski, Piotr A.

ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 108 PART 2 2002. p. 954-963.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Brown, JS, Kim, YC & Domanski, PA 2002, Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning. in ASHRAE Transactions. vol. 108 PART 2, pp. 954-963, ASHRAE Transactions 2002, Honolulu, HI, United States, 02/6/22.
Brown JS, Kim YC, Domanski PA. Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning. In ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 108 PART 2. 2002. p. 954-963
Brown, J. Steven ; Kim, Yong Chan ; Domanski, Piotr A. / Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning. ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 108 PART 2 2002. pp. 954-963
@inproceedings{aa46707e898d4558a4ead1e744976d5f,
title = "Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning",
abstract = "This paper compares the performance of CO 2 and R-22 in residential air-conditioning applications using semi-theoretical vapor compression and transcritical cycle models. The simulated R-22 system had a conventional component configuration, while the CO 2 system also included a liquid-line/suction-line heat exchanger. The CO 2 evaporator and gas cooler were microchannel heat exchangers originally designed for CO 2. The R-22 heat exchangers employed the same microchannel heat exchangers as CO 2 with the difference that we modified the refrigerant passages to obtain reasonable pressure drops. The study covers several heat exchanger sizes. The R-22 system had a significantly better coefficient of performance (COP) than the CO 2 system when equivalent heat exchangers were used in the CO 2 and R-22 systems, which indicates that the better transport properties and compressor isentropic efficiency of CO 2 did not compensate for the thermodynamic disadvantage of the transcritical cycle in comfort cooling applications. An entropy generation analysis showed that the CO 2 evaporator operated with fewer irreversibilities than did the R-22 evaporator. However, the CO 2 gas cooler and expansion device generated more entropy than their R-22 counterparts and were mainly responsible for the low COP of the CO 2 system.",
author = "Brown, {J. Steven} and Kim, {Yong Chan} and Domanski, {Piotr A.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "108 PART 2",
pages = "954--963",
booktitle = "ASHRAE Transactions",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of carbon dioxide as R-22 substitute for residential air-conditioning

AU - Brown, J. Steven

AU - Kim, Yong Chan

AU - Domanski, Piotr A.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper compares the performance of CO 2 and R-22 in residential air-conditioning applications using semi-theoretical vapor compression and transcritical cycle models. The simulated R-22 system had a conventional component configuration, while the CO 2 system also included a liquid-line/suction-line heat exchanger. The CO 2 evaporator and gas cooler were microchannel heat exchangers originally designed for CO 2. The R-22 heat exchangers employed the same microchannel heat exchangers as CO 2 with the difference that we modified the refrigerant passages to obtain reasonable pressure drops. The study covers several heat exchanger sizes. The R-22 system had a significantly better coefficient of performance (COP) than the CO 2 system when equivalent heat exchangers were used in the CO 2 and R-22 systems, which indicates that the better transport properties and compressor isentropic efficiency of CO 2 did not compensate for the thermodynamic disadvantage of the transcritical cycle in comfort cooling applications. An entropy generation analysis showed that the CO 2 evaporator operated with fewer irreversibilities than did the R-22 evaporator. However, the CO 2 gas cooler and expansion device generated more entropy than their R-22 counterparts and were mainly responsible for the low COP of the CO 2 system.

AB - This paper compares the performance of CO 2 and R-22 in residential air-conditioning applications using semi-theoretical vapor compression and transcritical cycle models. The simulated R-22 system had a conventional component configuration, while the CO 2 system also included a liquid-line/suction-line heat exchanger. The CO 2 evaporator and gas cooler were microchannel heat exchangers originally designed for CO 2. The R-22 heat exchangers employed the same microchannel heat exchangers as CO 2 with the difference that we modified the refrigerant passages to obtain reasonable pressure drops. The study covers several heat exchanger sizes. The R-22 system had a significantly better coefficient of performance (COP) than the CO 2 system when equivalent heat exchangers were used in the CO 2 and R-22 systems, which indicates that the better transport properties and compressor isentropic efficiency of CO 2 did not compensate for the thermodynamic disadvantage of the transcritical cycle in comfort cooling applications. An entropy generation analysis showed that the CO 2 evaporator operated with fewer irreversibilities than did the R-22 evaporator. However, the CO 2 gas cooler and expansion device generated more entropy than their R-22 counterparts and were mainly responsible for the low COP of the CO 2 system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036459244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036459244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 108 PART 2

SP - 954

EP - 963

BT - ASHRAE Transactions

ER -