Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ

Sun Kyoung Park, Amit Marmur, Seoung Bum Kim, Di Tian, Yongtao Hu, Peter H. McMurry, Armistead G. Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model is widely used in air quality management and scientific investigation. Numerous studies have been conducted investigating how well CMAQ simulates fine particle mass concentrations, but relatively few studies have addressed how well CMAQ simulates fine particle number distribution. Accurate simulation of particle number concentrations is important because particle number and surface area concentrations may be directly related to human health and visibility. Simulated fine particle number concentrations derived using CMAQ are compared to measurements to identify problems and to improve model performance. Evaluation is done using measured particle number concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia, from 1/1/1999 to 8/31/2000. While homogeneous binary nucleation mechanism used in CMAQ needs to be modified for better prediction of particle number concentrations, there are also other factors that affect the predicted particle level. Assumed particle size of the primary emissions in CMAQ causes number concentrations to be significantly underestimated, while particle density has a small impact. Assuming particle size distributions by three log-normal modes cannot accurately simulate particles with size less than 0.01 μm, particularly during nucleation events. An additional mode that accounts for particles smaller than 0.01 μm can improve the accuracy of the number concentration simulations. Though, the use of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate size distribution parameters of measured particles suggests that assumed parameters for the lognormal modes in CMAQ are generally reasonable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)985-996
Number of pages12
JournalAerosol Science and Technology
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Air quality
Particles (particulate matter)
air quality
particle size
Nucleation
nucleation
evaluation
particle
Quality management
Visibility
Particle size analysis
Particle size
Health
visibility
simulation
surface area

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution

Cite this

Park, S. K., Marmur, A., Kim, S. B., Tian, D., Hu, Y., McMurry, P. H., & Russell, A. G. (2006). Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ. Aerosol Science and Technology, 40(11), 985-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600907353

Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ. / Park, Sun Kyoung; Marmur, Amit; Kim, Seoung Bum; Tian, Di; Hu, Yongtao; McMurry, Peter H.; Russell, Armistead G.

In: Aerosol Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 11, 01.11.2006, p. 985-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, SK, Marmur, A, Kim, SB, Tian, D, Hu, Y, McMurry, PH & Russell, AG 2006, 'Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ', Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 985-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600907353
Park, Sun Kyoung ; Marmur, Amit ; Kim, Seoung Bum ; Tian, Di ; Hu, Yongtao ; McMurry, Peter H. ; Russell, Armistead G. / Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ. In: Aerosol Science and Technology. 2006 ; Vol. 40, No. 11. pp. 985-996.
@article{51207548dd2143ccb3e27e17d0d8409b,
title = "Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ",
abstract = "The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model is widely used in air quality management and scientific investigation. Numerous studies have been conducted investigating how well CMAQ simulates fine particle mass concentrations, but relatively few studies have addressed how well CMAQ simulates fine particle number distribution. Accurate simulation of particle number concentrations is important because particle number and surface area concentrations may be directly related to human health and visibility. Simulated fine particle number concentrations derived using CMAQ are compared to measurements to identify problems and to improve model performance. Evaluation is done using measured particle number concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia, from 1/1/1999 to 8/31/2000. While homogeneous binary nucleation mechanism used in CMAQ needs to be modified for better prediction of particle number concentrations, there are also other factors that affect the predicted particle level. Assumed particle size of the primary emissions in CMAQ causes number concentrations to be significantly underestimated, while particle density has a small impact. Assuming particle size distributions by three log-normal modes cannot accurately simulate particles with size less than 0.01 μm, particularly during nucleation events. An additional mode that accounts for particles smaller than 0.01 μm can improve the accuracy of the number concentration simulations. Though, the use of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate size distribution parameters of measured particles suggests that assumed parameters for the lognormal modes in CMAQ are generally reasonable.",
author = "Park, {Sun Kyoung} and Amit Marmur and Kim, {Seoung Bum} and Di Tian and Yongtao Hu and McMurry, {Peter H.} and Russell, {Armistead G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02786820600907353",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "985--996",
journal = "Aerosol Science and Technology",
issn = "0278-6826",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of fine particle number concentrations in CMAQ

AU - Park, Sun Kyoung

AU - Marmur, Amit

AU - Kim, Seoung Bum

AU - Tian, Di

AU - Hu, Yongtao

AU - McMurry, Peter H.

AU - Russell, Armistead G.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model is widely used in air quality management and scientific investigation. Numerous studies have been conducted investigating how well CMAQ simulates fine particle mass concentrations, but relatively few studies have addressed how well CMAQ simulates fine particle number distribution. Accurate simulation of particle number concentrations is important because particle number and surface area concentrations may be directly related to human health and visibility. Simulated fine particle number concentrations derived using CMAQ are compared to measurements to identify problems and to improve model performance. Evaluation is done using measured particle number concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia, from 1/1/1999 to 8/31/2000. While homogeneous binary nucleation mechanism used in CMAQ needs to be modified for better prediction of particle number concentrations, there are also other factors that affect the predicted particle level. Assumed particle size of the primary emissions in CMAQ causes number concentrations to be significantly underestimated, while particle density has a small impact. Assuming particle size distributions by three log-normal modes cannot accurately simulate particles with size less than 0.01 μm, particularly during nucleation events. An additional mode that accounts for particles smaller than 0.01 μm can improve the accuracy of the number concentration simulations. Though, the use of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate size distribution parameters of measured particles suggests that assumed parameters for the lognormal modes in CMAQ are generally reasonable.

AB - The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model is widely used in air quality management and scientific investigation. Numerous studies have been conducted investigating how well CMAQ simulates fine particle mass concentrations, but relatively few studies have addressed how well CMAQ simulates fine particle number distribution. Accurate simulation of particle number concentrations is important because particle number and surface area concentrations may be directly related to human health and visibility. Simulated fine particle number concentrations derived using CMAQ are compared to measurements to identify problems and to improve model performance. Evaluation is done using measured particle number concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia, from 1/1/1999 to 8/31/2000. While homogeneous binary nucleation mechanism used in CMAQ needs to be modified for better prediction of particle number concentrations, there are also other factors that affect the predicted particle level. Assumed particle size of the primary emissions in CMAQ causes number concentrations to be significantly underestimated, while particle density has a small impact. Assuming particle size distributions by three log-normal modes cannot accurately simulate particles with size less than 0.01 μm, particularly during nucleation events. An additional mode that accounts for particles smaller than 0.01 μm can improve the accuracy of the number concentration simulations. Though, the use of the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate size distribution parameters of measured particles suggests that assumed parameters for the lognormal modes in CMAQ are generally reasonable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862907883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862907883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02786820600907353

DO - 10.1080/02786820600907353

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862907883

VL - 40

SP - 985

EP - 996

JO - Aerosol Science and Technology

JF - Aerosol Science and Technology

SN - 0278-6826

IS - 11

ER -