Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task

Ram R. Bishu, Rohae Myung, Joseph M. Deeb

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors Society
Editors Anon
PublisherPubl by Human Factors Soc Inc
Pages692-696
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90 - Orlando, FL, USA
Duration: 1990 Oct 81990 Oct 12

Other

OtherProceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90
CityOrlando, FL, USA
Period90/10/890/10/12

Fingerprint

Durability
Containers
Polynomials
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Bishu, R. R., Myung, R., & Deeb, J. M. (1990). Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. In Anon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society (pp. 692-696). Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc.

Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. / Bishu, Ram R.; Myung, Rohae; Deeb, Joseph M.

Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. ed. / Anon. Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc, 1990. p. 692-696.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bishu, RR, Myung, R & Deeb, JM 1990, Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. in Anon (ed.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc, pp. 692-696, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90, Orlando, FL, USA, 90/10/8.
Bishu RR, Myung R, Deeb JM. Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. In Anon, editor, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc. 1990. p. 692-696
Bishu, Ram R. ; Myung, Rohae ; Deeb, Joseph M. / Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. editor / Anon. Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc, 1990. pp. 692-696
@inproceedings{bb35c1070c114b628548f2fa742cd5e0,
title = "Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task",
abstract = "Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25{\%}, 50{\%}, 75{\%}, and 100{\%} of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.",
author = "Bishu, {Ram R.} and Rohae Myung and Deeb, {Joseph M.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English",
pages = "692--696",
editor = "Anon",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors Society",
publisher = "Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task

AU - Bishu, Ram R.

AU - Myung, Rohae

AU - Deeb, Joseph M.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

AB - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:0025551878

SP - 692

EP - 696

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society

A2 - Anon, null

PB - Publ by Human Factors Soc Inc

ER -