Evaluation of rainfall temporal distribution models with annual maximum rainfall events in Seoul, Korea

Wooyoung Na, Chulsang Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study evaluated five models of rainfall temporal distribution (i.e., the Yen and Chow model, Mononobe model, alternating block method, Huff model, and Keifer and Chu model), with the annual maximum rainfall events selected from Seoul, Korea, from 1961 to 2016. Three different evaluation measures were considered: the absolute difference between the rainfall peaks of the model and the observed, the root mean square error, and the pattern correlation coefficient. Also, sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether the model, or the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution, had the dominant effect on the runoff peak flow. As a result, the Keifer and Chu model was found to produce the most similar rainfall peak to the observed, the root mean square error was smaller for the Yen and Chow model and the alternating block method, and the pattern correlation was larger for the alternating block method. Overall, the best model to approximate the annual maximum rainfall events observed in Seoul, Korea, was found to be the alternating block method. Finally, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the model of rainfall temporal distribution was found to be much higher than that to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution. In particular, in small basins with a high curve number (CN) value, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution was found to be insignificant.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1468
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 17

Fingerprint

Korea
temporal distribution
Korean Peninsula
Rain
rain
rainfall
event
evaluation
peak flow
Runoff
runoff
Mean square error
Seoul
methodology
Sensitivity analysis
sensitivity analysis
basins
method

Keywords

  • Annual maximum rainfall event
  • Rainfall temporal distribution
  • Rainfall-runoff analysis
  • Sensitivity analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Aquatic Science
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Evaluation of rainfall temporal distribution models with annual maximum rainfall events in Seoul, Korea. / Na, Wooyoung; Yoo, Chulsang.

In: Water (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 10, 1468, 17.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{465c5e06e2b4451f98c93081b22fecd6,
title = "Evaluation of rainfall temporal distribution models with annual maximum rainfall events in Seoul, Korea",
abstract = "This study evaluated five models of rainfall temporal distribution (i.e., the Yen and Chow model, Mononobe model, alternating block method, Huff model, and Keifer and Chu model), with the annual maximum rainfall events selected from Seoul, Korea, from 1961 to 2016. Three different evaluation measures were considered: the absolute difference between the rainfall peaks of the model and the observed, the root mean square error, and the pattern correlation coefficient. Also, sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether the model, or the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution, had the dominant effect on the runoff peak flow. As a result, the Keifer and Chu model was found to produce the most similar rainfall peak to the observed, the root mean square error was smaller for the Yen and Chow model and the alternating block method, and the pattern correlation was larger for the alternating block method. Overall, the best model to approximate the annual maximum rainfall events observed in Seoul, Korea, was found to be the alternating block method. Finally, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the model of rainfall temporal distribution was found to be much higher than that to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution. In particular, in small basins with a high curve number (CN) value, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution was found to be insignificant.",
keywords = "Annual maximum rainfall event, Rainfall temporal distribution, Rainfall-runoff analysis, Sensitivity analysis",
author = "Wooyoung Na and Chulsang Yoo",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.3390/w10101468",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Water (Switzerland)",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of rainfall temporal distribution models with annual maximum rainfall events in Seoul, Korea

AU - Na, Wooyoung

AU - Yoo, Chulsang

PY - 2018/10/17

Y1 - 2018/10/17

N2 - This study evaluated five models of rainfall temporal distribution (i.e., the Yen and Chow model, Mononobe model, alternating block method, Huff model, and Keifer and Chu model), with the annual maximum rainfall events selected from Seoul, Korea, from 1961 to 2016. Three different evaluation measures were considered: the absolute difference between the rainfall peaks of the model and the observed, the root mean square error, and the pattern correlation coefficient. Also, sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether the model, or the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution, had the dominant effect on the runoff peak flow. As a result, the Keifer and Chu model was found to produce the most similar rainfall peak to the observed, the root mean square error was smaller for the Yen and Chow model and the alternating block method, and the pattern correlation was larger for the alternating block method. Overall, the best model to approximate the annual maximum rainfall events observed in Seoul, Korea, was found to be the alternating block method. Finally, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the model of rainfall temporal distribution was found to be much higher than that to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution. In particular, in small basins with a high curve number (CN) value, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution was found to be insignificant.

AB - This study evaluated five models of rainfall temporal distribution (i.e., the Yen and Chow model, Mononobe model, alternating block method, Huff model, and Keifer and Chu model), with the annual maximum rainfall events selected from Seoul, Korea, from 1961 to 2016. Three different evaluation measures were considered: the absolute difference between the rainfall peaks of the model and the observed, the root mean square error, and the pattern correlation coefficient. Also, sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether the model, or the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution, had the dominant effect on the runoff peak flow. As a result, the Keifer and Chu model was found to produce the most similar rainfall peak to the observed, the root mean square error was smaller for the Yen and Chow model and the alternating block method, and the pattern correlation was larger for the alternating block method. Overall, the best model to approximate the annual maximum rainfall events observed in Seoul, Korea, was found to be the alternating block method. Finally, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the model of rainfall temporal distribution was found to be much higher than that to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution. In particular, in small basins with a high curve number (CN) value, the sensitivity of the runoff peak flow to the randomness of the rainfall temporal distribution was found to be insignificant.

KW - Annual maximum rainfall event

KW - Rainfall temporal distribution

KW - Rainfall-runoff analysis

KW - Sensitivity analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054963348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054963348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/w10101468

DO - 10.3390/w10101468

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Water (Switzerland)

JF - Water (Switzerland)

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 10

M1 - 1468

ER -