TY - JOUR
T1 - Exchange rate regimes and economic linkages
AU - Lee, Jong Wha
AU - Shin, Kwanho
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to an anonymous referee, Warwick McKibbin, Tom Willett, and seminar participants at the Australian National University, Claremont McKenna College and University of Southern California for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Jong Wha Lee acknowledges the support by a Korea University grant (K0516201).
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - We investigate how the exchange rate regime influences economic linkages between countries. We divide the exchange rate regime into three classifications: currency union, peg and floating exchange rates. Unlike most studies that solely focus on the relationship between anchor and client countries, we infer the exchange rate regime between any two countries based on their relationship to the common anchor currency. Then we empirically explore how the various exchange rate regimes impact on bilateral trade, output co-movement and risk sharing. The extent of risk sharing is measured by consumption co-movement relative to output co-movement. We find that while currency union has the greatest effect, the peg regime also significantly boosts trade.We also find that while the peg regime contributes to both output and consumption co-movements, currency union strengthens only consumption co-movement and possibly lowers output co-movement.We interpret these findings to indicate that currency union, the strictest form of pegged regimes, leads to higher industry specialization and better risk sharing opportunities than the less strict peg regime.
AB - We investigate how the exchange rate regime influences economic linkages between countries. We divide the exchange rate regime into three classifications: currency union, peg and floating exchange rates. Unlike most studies that solely focus on the relationship between anchor and client countries, we infer the exchange rate regime between any two countries based on their relationship to the common anchor currency. Then we empirically explore how the various exchange rate regimes impact on bilateral trade, output co-movement and risk sharing. The extent of risk sharing is measured by consumption co-movement relative to output co-movement. We find that while currency union has the greatest effect, the peg regime also significantly boosts trade.We also find that while the peg regime contributes to both output and consumption co-movements, currency union strengthens only consumption co-movement and possibly lowers output co-movement.We interpret these findings to indicate that currency union, the strictest form of pegged regimes, leads to higher industry specialization and better risk sharing opportunities than the less strict peg regime.
KW - Consumption co-movement
KW - Exchange rate regime
KW - Output co-movement
KW - Risk sharing
KW - Trade
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951548392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951548392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10168731003589741
DO - 10.1080/10168731003589741
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77951548392
SN - 1016-8737
VL - 24
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - International Economic Journal
JF - International Economic Journal
IS - 1
ER -