Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea

Jaewon Yang, Changsu Han, Ho-Kyoung Yoon, Chi Un Pae, Min Jeong Kim, Sun Young Park, Jeonghoon Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines can improve health-care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in adopting and implementing the current practice guidelines for depression. The aim of this study was to determine clinical experiences and perceived barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in psychiatric care.Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 386 psychiatric specialists to inquire about experiences and attitudes related to the depression guidelines and barriers influencing the use of the guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed, and qualitative data were transcribed and coded manually.Results: Almost three quarters of the psychiatrists (74.6%) were aware of the clinical guidelines for depression, and over half of participants (55.7%) had had clinical experiences with the guidelines in practice. The main reported advantages of the guidelines were that they helped in clinical decision making and provided informative resources for the patients and their caregivers. Despite this, some psychiatrists were making treatment decisions that were not in accordance with the depression guidelines. Lack of knowledge was the main obstacle to the implementation of guidelines assessed by the psychiatrists. Other complaints addressed difficulties in accessing the guidelines, lack of support for mental health services, and general attitudes toward guideline necessity. Overall, the responses suggested that adding a summary booklet, providing teaching sessions, and improving guidance delivery systems could be effective tools for increasing depression guideline usage.Conclusion: Individual barriers, such as lack of awareness and lack of familiarity, and external barriers, such as the supplying system, can affect whether physicians' implement the guidelines for the treatment of depression in Korea. These findings suggest that further medical education to disseminate guidelines contents could improve public health for depression.

Original languageEnglish
Article number150
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 May 27

Fingerprint

Korea
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Depression
Psychiatry
Pamphlets
Mental Health Services
Medical Education
Caregivers
Decision Making
Teaching
Public Health

Keywords

  • Depressive disorder
  • Health care surveys
  • Practice guidelines
  • Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea. / Yang, Jaewon; Han, Changsu; Yoon, Ho-Kyoung; Pae, Chi Un; Kim, Min Jeong; Park, Sun Young; Ahn, Jeonghoon.

In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 13, 150, 27.05.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yang, Jaewon ; Han, Changsu ; Yoon, Ho-Kyoung ; Pae, Chi Un ; Kim, Min Jeong ; Park, Sun Young ; Ahn, Jeonghoon. / Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea. In: BMC Psychiatry. 2013 ; Vol. 13.
@article{3e612030d4eb49118942f62bacb4134f,
title = "Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea",
abstract = "Background: Clinical guidelines can improve health-care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in adopting and implementing the current practice guidelines for depression. The aim of this study was to determine clinical experiences and perceived barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in psychiatric care.Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 386 psychiatric specialists to inquire about experiences and attitudes related to the depression guidelines and barriers influencing the use of the guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed, and qualitative data were transcribed and coded manually.Results: Almost three quarters of the psychiatrists (74.6{\%}) were aware of the clinical guidelines for depression, and over half of participants (55.7{\%}) had had clinical experiences with the guidelines in practice. The main reported advantages of the guidelines were that they helped in clinical decision making and provided informative resources for the patients and their caregivers. Despite this, some psychiatrists were making treatment decisions that were not in accordance with the depression guidelines. Lack of knowledge was the main obstacle to the implementation of guidelines assessed by the psychiatrists. Other complaints addressed difficulties in accessing the guidelines, lack of support for mental health services, and general attitudes toward guideline necessity. Overall, the responses suggested that adding a summary booklet, providing teaching sessions, and improving guidance delivery systems could be effective tools for increasing depression guideline usage.Conclusion: Individual barriers, such as lack of awareness and lack of familiarity, and external barriers, such as the supplying system, can affect whether physicians' implement the guidelines for the treatment of depression in Korea. These findings suggest that further medical education to disseminate guidelines contents could improve public health for depression.",
keywords = "Depressive disorder, Health care surveys, Practice guidelines, Questionnaires",
author = "Jaewon Yang and Changsu Han and Ho-Kyoung Yoon and Pae, {Chi Un} and Kim, {Min Jeong} and Park, {Sun Young} and Jeonghoon Ahn",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/1471-244X-13-150",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiences and barriers to implementation of clinical practice guideline for depression in Korea

AU - Yang, Jaewon

AU - Han, Changsu

AU - Yoon, Ho-Kyoung

AU - Pae, Chi Un

AU - Kim, Min Jeong

AU - Park, Sun Young

AU - Ahn, Jeonghoon

PY - 2013/5/27

Y1 - 2013/5/27

N2 - Background: Clinical guidelines can improve health-care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in adopting and implementing the current practice guidelines for depression. The aim of this study was to determine clinical experiences and perceived barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in psychiatric care.Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 386 psychiatric specialists to inquire about experiences and attitudes related to the depression guidelines and barriers influencing the use of the guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed, and qualitative data were transcribed and coded manually.Results: Almost three quarters of the psychiatrists (74.6%) were aware of the clinical guidelines for depression, and over half of participants (55.7%) had had clinical experiences with the guidelines in practice. The main reported advantages of the guidelines were that they helped in clinical decision making and provided informative resources for the patients and their caregivers. Despite this, some psychiatrists were making treatment decisions that were not in accordance with the depression guidelines. Lack of knowledge was the main obstacle to the implementation of guidelines assessed by the psychiatrists. Other complaints addressed difficulties in accessing the guidelines, lack of support for mental health services, and general attitudes toward guideline necessity. Overall, the responses suggested that adding a summary booklet, providing teaching sessions, and improving guidance delivery systems could be effective tools for increasing depression guideline usage.Conclusion: Individual barriers, such as lack of awareness and lack of familiarity, and external barriers, such as the supplying system, can affect whether physicians' implement the guidelines for the treatment of depression in Korea. These findings suggest that further medical education to disseminate guidelines contents could improve public health for depression.

AB - Background: Clinical guidelines can improve health-care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in adopting and implementing the current practice guidelines for depression. The aim of this study was to determine clinical experiences and perceived barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in psychiatric care.Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 386 psychiatric specialists to inquire about experiences and attitudes related to the depression guidelines and barriers influencing the use of the guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed, and qualitative data were transcribed and coded manually.Results: Almost three quarters of the psychiatrists (74.6%) were aware of the clinical guidelines for depression, and over half of participants (55.7%) had had clinical experiences with the guidelines in practice. The main reported advantages of the guidelines were that they helped in clinical decision making and provided informative resources for the patients and their caregivers. Despite this, some psychiatrists were making treatment decisions that were not in accordance with the depression guidelines. Lack of knowledge was the main obstacle to the implementation of guidelines assessed by the psychiatrists. Other complaints addressed difficulties in accessing the guidelines, lack of support for mental health services, and general attitudes toward guideline necessity. Overall, the responses suggested that adding a summary booklet, providing teaching sessions, and improving guidance delivery systems could be effective tools for increasing depression guideline usage.Conclusion: Individual barriers, such as lack of awareness and lack of familiarity, and external barriers, such as the supplying system, can affect whether physicians' implement the guidelines for the treatment of depression in Korea. These findings suggest that further medical education to disseminate guidelines contents could improve public health for depression.

KW - Depressive disorder

KW - Health care surveys

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878009923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878009923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-244X-13-150

DO - 10.1186/1471-244X-13-150

M3 - Article

C2 - 23705908

AN - SCOPUS:84878009923

VL - 13

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

M1 - 150

ER -