Experimental investigation of multifunctional VRF system in heating and shoulder seasons

Laeun Kwon, Hoseong Lee, Yunho Hwang, Reinhard Radermacher, Byungsoon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The top three end uses which are space heating, space cooling, and water heating accounted for close to 41 percent of site energy consumption in U.S. building primary energy consumption. A multifunctional variable refrigerant flow (MFVRF) system is finding its way into buildings since it can simultaneously provide space cooling, space heating and hot water. The MFVRF system was installed in an office building and fully instrumented to measure the performance of the system under a wide range of outdoor weather conditions. The effects of a part-load ratio (PLR), a hot water demand and a heat recovery operation mode on the performance of the MFVRF system were investigated in a field test for the heating and shoulder seasons. As the hot water demand for the MFVRF system increased, the PLR was improved, which resulted in an increase in system heating performance. In the heat recovery operation mode, the heat absorbed from the indoor units operating in the cooling mode was transferred to other indoor units operating in the heating mode. The daily performance factor was 2.14 and 3.54 when the ratio of daily total cooling energy to daily total energy was 13.0% and 28.4%, respectively, at the similar outdoor weather conditions. This enhancement was attributed to the waste heat recovered during the heat recovery operation mode and the decrease in pressure ratio, which is a result of the improvement of the compressor efficiency. The performance of the MFVRF system for the heating and shoulder seasons was improved by transferring the recovered energy to the indoor space and supplying the hot water.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-364
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Thermal Engineering
Volume66
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Flow of fluids
Heating
Waste heat utilization
Cooling
Space heating
Water
Energy utilization
Office buildings
Waste heat
Compressors

Keywords

  • Heat recovery
  • Hot water
  • MFVRF
  • Part-load ratio
  • Variable refrigerant flow
  • VRF

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Experimental investigation of multifunctional VRF system in heating and shoulder seasons. / Kwon, Laeun; Lee, Hoseong; Hwang, Yunho; Radermacher, Reinhard; Kim, Byungsoon.

In: Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 66, No. 1-2, 01.01.2014, p. 355-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kwon, Laeun ; Lee, Hoseong ; Hwang, Yunho ; Radermacher, Reinhard ; Kim, Byungsoon. / Experimental investigation of multifunctional VRF system in heating and shoulder seasons. In: Applied Thermal Engineering. 2014 ; Vol. 66, No. 1-2. pp. 355-364.
@article{28ebff50e2da45d2a9736314d6cf856e,
title = "Experimental investigation of multifunctional VRF system in heating and shoulder seasons",
abstract = "The top three end uses which are space heating, space cooling, and water heating accounted for close to 41 percent of site energy consumption in U.S. building primary energy consumption. A multifunctional variable refrigerant flow (MFVRF) system is finding its way into buildings since it can simultaneously provide space cooling, space heating and hot water. The MFVRF system was installed in an office building and fully instrumented to measure the performance of the system under a wide range of outdoor weather conditions. The effects of a part-load ratio (PLR), a hot water demand and a heat recovery operation mode on the performance of the MFVRF system were investigated in a field test for the heating and shoulder seasons. As the hot water demand for the MFVRF system increased, the PLR was improved, which resulted in an increase in system heating performance. In the heat recovery operation mode, the heat absorbed from the indoor units operating in the cooling mode was transferred to other indoor units operating in the heating mode. The daily performance factor was 2.14 and 3.54 when the ratio of daily total cooling energy to daily total energy was 13.0{\%} and 28.4{\%}, respectively, at the similar outdoor weather conditions. This enhancement was attributed to the waste heat recovered during the heat recovery operation mode and the decrease in pressure ratio, which is a result of the improvement of the compressor efficiency. The performance of the MFVRF system for the heating and shoulder seasons was improved by transferring the recovered energy to the indoor space and supplying the hot water.",
keywords = "Heat recovery, Hot water, MFVRF, Part-load ratio, Variable refrigerant flow, VRF",
author = "Laeun Kwon and Hoseong Lee and Yunho Hwang and Reinhard Radermacher and Byungsoon Kim",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.032",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "355--364",
journal = "Applied Thermal Engineering",
issn = "1359-4311",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental investigation of multifunctional VRF system in heating and shoulder seasons

AU - Kwon, Laeun

AU - Lee, Hoseong

AU - Hwang, Yunho

AU - Radermacher, Reinhard

AU - Kim, Byungsoon

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The top three end uses which are space heating, space cooling, and water heating accounted for close to 41 percent of site energy consumption in U.S. building primary energy consumption. A multifunctional variable refrigerant flow (MFVRF) system is finding its way into buildings since it can simultaneously provide space cooling, space heating and hot water. The MFVRF system was installed in an office building and fully instrumented to measure the performance of the system under a wide range of outdoor weather conditions. The effects of a part-load ratio (PLR), a hot water demand and a heat recovery operation mode on the performance of the MFVRF system were investigated in a field test for the heating and shoulder seasons. As the hot water demand for the MFVRF system increased, the PLR was improved, which resulted in an increase in system heating performance. In the heat recovery operation mode, the heat absorbed from the indoor units operating in the cooling mode was transferred to other indoor units operating in the heating mode. The daily performance factor was 2.14 and 3.54 when the ratio of daily total cooling energy to daily total energy was 13.0% and 28.4%, respectively, at the similar outdoor weather conditions. This enhancement was attributed to the waste heat recovered during the heat recovery operation mode and the decrease in pressure ratio, which is a result of the improvement of the compressor efficiency. The performance of the MFVRF system for the heating and shoulder seasons was improved by transferring the recovered energy to the indoor space and supplying the hot water.

AB - The top three end uses which are space heating, space cooling, and water heating accounted for close to 41 percent of site energy consumption in U.S. building primary energy consumption. A multifunctional variable refrigerant flow (MFVRF) system is finding its way into buildings since it can simultaneously provide space cooling, space heating and hot water. The MFVRF system was installed in an office building and fully instrumented to measure the performance of the system under a wide range of outdoor weather conditions. The effects of a part-load ratio (PLR), a hot water demand and a heat recovery operation mode on the performance of the MFVRF system were investigated in a field test for the heating and shoulder seasons. As the hot water demand for the MFVRF system increased, the PLR was improved, which resulted in an increase in system heating performance. In the heat recovery operation mode, the heat absorbed from the indoor units operating in the cooling mode was transferred to other indoor units operating in the heating mode. The daily performance factor was 2.14 and 3.54 when the ratio of daily total cooling energy to daily total energy was 13.0% and 28.4%, respectively, at the similar outdoor weather conditions. This enhancement was attributed to the waste heat recovered during the heat recovery operation mode and the decrease in pressure ratio, which is a result of the improvement of the compressor efficiency. The performance of the MFVRF system for the heating and shoulder seasons was improved by transferring the recovered energy to the indoor space and supplying the hot water.

KW - Heat recovery

KW - Hot water

KW - MFVRF

KW - Part-load ratio

KW - Variable refrigerant flow

KW - VRF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896536442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896536442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.032

DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896536442

VL - 66

SP - 355

EP - 364

JO - Applied Thermal Engineering

JF - Applied Thermal Engineering

SN - 1359-4311

IS - 1-2

ER -