Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon

Young Hwii Ko, Rafael F. Coelho, Sanket Chauhan, Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman, Oscar Schatloff, Jun Cheon, Vipul R. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In this study we identified preoperative or intraoperative factors responsible for the early return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using data from a high volume center. Materials and Methods: Data from 1,299 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to June 2010 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to whether they regained continence (no pad and no urinary leakage) within 3 months and variables were then compared. A self-administered validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) was used for assessment of continence status and time to recovery. Results: Within 3 months after surgery 86.3% of patients (1,121/1,299) had recovered continence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that only age (p <0.001, hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.970.99) and performance of a nerve sparing procedure were independent predictors. After adjusting for age, the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95% CI 1.252.07, p <0.001) for partial nerve sparing and 1.44 (1.131.83, p = 0.003) for bilateral nerve sparing compared to the nonnerve sparing group. Median time (95% CI) to the recovery of continence was prolonged in the nonnerve sparing group compared to nerve sparing counterparts at 6 (5.126.88), 4 (3.604.40) and 5 weeks (4.705.30) in the nonnerve sparing, partial nerve sparing and bilateral nerve sparing groups, respectively, with log rank p <0.01. Conclusions: Findings from our analysis indicate that the likelihood of postoperative urinary control was significantly higher in younger patients and when a nerve sparing procedure was performed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-194
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume187
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
Regression Analysis
Surgeons

Keywords

  • prostatectomy
  • urinary incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy : analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon. / Ko, Young Hwii; Coelho, Rafael F.; Chauhan, Sanket; Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan; Schatloff, Oscar; Cheon, Jun; Patel, Vipul R.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 187, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 190-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ko, Young Hwii ; Coelho, Rafael F. ; Chauhan, Sanket ; Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ; Schatloff, Oscar ; Cheon, Jun ; Patel, Vipul R. / Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy : analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon. In: Journal of Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 187, No. 1. pp. 190-194.
@article{c90892abedb5457b941e9817fbb94bad,
title = "Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon",
abstract = "Purpose: In this study we identified preoperative or intraoperative factors responsible for the early return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using data from a high volume center. Materials and Methods: Data from 1,299 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to June 2010 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to whether they regained continence (no pad and no urinary leakage) within 3 months and variables were then compared. A self-administered validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) was used for assessment of continence status and time to recovery. Results: Within 3 months after surgery 86.3{\%} of patients (1,121/1,299) had recovered continence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that only age (p <0.001, hazard ratio 0.98, 95{\%} CI 0.970.99) and performance of a nerve sparing procedure were independent predictors. After adjusting for age, the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95{\%} CI 1.252.07, p <0.001) for partial nerve sparing and 1.44 (1.131.83, p = 0.003) for bilateral nerve sparing compared to the nonnerve sparing group. Median time (95{\%} CI) to the recovery of continence was prolonged in the nonnerve sparing group compared to nerve sparing counterparts at 6 (5.126.88), 4 (3.604.40) and 5 weeks (4.705.30) in the nonnerve sparing, partial nerve sparing and bilateral nerve sparing groups, respectively, with log rank p <0.01. Conclusions: Findings from our analysis indicate that the likelihood of postoperative urinary control was significantly higher in younger patients and when a nerve sparing procedure was performed.",
keywords = "prostatectomy, urinary incontinence",
author = "Ko, {Young Hwii} and Coelho, {Rafael F.} and Sanket Chauhan and Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman and Oscar Schatloff and Jun Cheon and Patel, {Vipul R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.037",
language = "English",
volume = "187",
pages = "190--194",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

T2 - analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon

AU - Ko, Young Hwii

AU - Coelho, Rafael F.

AU - Chauhan, Sanket

AU - Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan

AU - Schatloff, Oscar

AU - Cheon, Jun

AU - Patel, Vipul R.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Purpose: In this study we identified preoperative or intraoperative factors responsible for the early return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using data from a high volume center. Materials and Methods: Data from 1,299 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to June 2010 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to whether they regained continence (no pad and no urinary leakage) within 3 months and variables were then compared. A self-administered validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) was used for assessment of continence status and time to recovery. Results: Within 3 months after surgery 86.3% of patients (1,121/1,299) had recovered continence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that only age (p <0.001, hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.970.99) and performance of a nerve sparing procedure were independent predictors. After adjusting for age, the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95% CI 1.252.07, p <0.001) for partial nerve sparing and 1.44 (1.131.83, p = 0.003) for bilateral nerve sparing compared to the nonnerve sparing group. Median time (95% CI) to the recovery of continence was prolonged in the nonnerve sparing group compared to nerve sparing counterparts at 6 (5.126.88), 4 (3.604.40) and 5 weeks (4.705.30) in the nonnerve sparing, partial nerve sparing and bilateral nerve sparing groups, respectively, with log rank p <0.01. Conclusions: Findings from our analysis indicate that the likelihood of postoperative urinary control was significantly higher in younger patients and when a nerve sparing procedure was performed.

AB - Purpose: In this study we identified preoperative or intraoperative factors responsible for the early return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using data from a high volume center. Materials and Methods: Data from 1,299 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to June 2010 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to whether they regained continence (no pad and no urinary leakage) within 3 months and variables were then compared. A self-administered validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) was used for assessment of continence status and time to recovery. Results: Within 3 months after surgery 86.3% of patients (1,121/1,299) had recovered continence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that only age (p <0.001, hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.970.99) and performance of a nerve sparing procedure were independent predictors. After adjusting for age, the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95% CI 1.252.07, p <0.001) for partial nerve sparing and 1.44 (1.131.83, p = 0.003) for bilateral nerve sparing compared to the nonnerve sparing group. Median time (95% CI) to the recovery of continence was prolonged in the nonnerve sparing group compared to nerve sparing counterparts at 6 (5.126.88), 4 (3.604.40) and 5 weeks (4.705.30) in the nonnerve sparing, partial nerve sparing and bilateral nerve sparing groups, respectively, with log rank p <0.01. Conclusions: Findings from our analysis indicate that the likelihood of postoperative urinary control was significantly higher in younger patients and when a nerve sparing procedure was performed.

KW - prostatectomy

KW - urinary incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83555172656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83555172656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.037

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.037

M3 - Article

C2 - 22114811

AN - SCOPUS:83555172656

VL - 187

SP - 190

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -