Field trials of phytomining and phytoremediation: A critical review of influencing factors and effects of additives

Liuwei Wang, Deyi Hou, Zhengtao Shen, Jin Zhu, Xiyue Jia, Yong Sik Ok, Filip M.G. Tack, Jörg Rinklebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Plant-based technologies including phytomining, phytoextraction, phytodegradation, phytostabilization and phytovolatilization have drawn much attention during the last decade. To examine the feasibility of these nature-based solutions to accumulate, degrade, stabilize or volatize metal(loid)s and/or organic contaminants, an increasing number of field studies have been conducted. This review critically evaluates influencing factors in phytomining and phytoremediation approaches, including contaminant concentrations, fertilizer application and chelating agent addition, planting characteristics (e.g. plant density, seeding, cropping and harvesting methods), and soil properties (e.g. salinity, soil texture and soil pH). A proper trial design will assure the robustness of the results if these factors were taken into consideration seriously. We also summarized knowledge about additives used in field trials, especially biological waste-derived amendments such as biochar, compost, sewage sludge and manure. According to the literature reviewed, controversy remains whether these amendments can promote the plant performance. In addition, the utilization of microorganisms and transgenic plants in field trials, and the associated biosafety concerns such as horizontal gene transfer were discussed. Future research should examine the ecological risks associated with phytomining and phytoremediation (e.g. the secondary migration of contaminants due to improper handling of harvested plants). It is suggested that the results of field studies should guide commercial applications of phytomining and phytoremediation. (Figure presented.).

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

phytoremediation
Impurities
Soils
Gene transfer
pollutant
Manures
Sewage sludge
Fertilizers
biosafety
Chelation
Microorganisms
transgenic plant
chelating agent
gene transfer
fertilizer application
Textures
soil texture
seeding
compost
cropping practice

Keywords

  • biological waste
  • hyperaccumulator
  • nature-based solution
  • Soil contamination
  • sustainable remediation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

Field trials of phytomining and phytoremediation : A critical review of influencing factors and effects of additives. / Wang, Liuwei; Hou, Deyi; Shen, Zhengtao; Zhu, Jin; Jia, Xiyue; Ok, Yong Sik; Tack, Filip M.G.; Rinklebe, Jörg.

In: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e368308489f4a2eb7eebce90ed31803,
title = "Field trials of phytomining and phytoremediation: A critical review of influencing factors and effects of additives",
abstract = "Plant-based technologies including phytomining, phytoextraction, phytodegradation, phytostabilization and phytovolatilization have drawn much attention during the last decade. To examine the feasibility of these nature-based solutions to accumulate, degrade, stabilize or volatize metal(loid)s and/or organic contaminants, an increasing number of field studies have been conducted. This review critically evaluates influencing factors in phytomining and phytoremediation approaches, including contaminant concentrations, fertilizer application and chelating agent addition, planting characteristics (e.g. plant density, seeding, cropping and harvesting methods), and soil properties (e.g. salinity, soil texture and soil pH). A proper trial design will assure the robustness of the results if these factors were taken into consideration seriously. We also summarized knowledge about additives used in field trials, especially biological waste-derived amendments such as biochar, compost, sewage sludge and manure. According to the literature reviewed, controversy remains whether these amendments can promote the plant performance. In addition, the utilization of microorganisms and transgenic plants in field trials, and the associated biosafety concerns such as horizontal gene transfer were discussed. Future research should examine the ecological risks associated with phytomining and phytoremediation (e.g. the secondary migration of contaminants due to improper handling of harvested plants). It is suggested that the results of field studies should guide commercial applications of phytomining and phytoremediation. (Figure presented.).",
keywords = "biological waste, hyperaccumulator, nature-based solution, Soil contamination, sustainable remediation",
author = "Liuwei Wang and Deyi Hou and Zhengtao Shen and Jin Zhu and Xiyue Jia and Ok, {Yong Sik} and Tack, {Filip M.G.} and J{\"o}rg Rinklebe",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10643389.2019.1705724",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "1064-3389",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field trials of phytomining and phytoremediation

T2 - A critical review of influencing factors and effects of additives

AU - Wang, Liuwei

AU - Hou, Deyi

AU - Shen, Zhengtao

AU - Zhu, Jin

AU - Jia, Xiyue

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

AU - Tack, Filip M.G.

AU - Rinklebe, Jörg

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Plant-based technologies including phytomining, phytoextraction, phytodegradation, phytostabilization and phytovolatilization have drawn much attention during the last decade. To examine the feasibility of these nature-based solutions to accumulate, degrade, stabilize or volatize metal(loid)s and/or organic contaminants, an increasing number of field studies have been conducted. This review critically evaluates influencing factors in phytomining and phytoremediation approaches, including contaminant concentrations, fertilizer application and chelating agent addition, planting characteristics (e.g. plant density, seeding, cropping and harvesting methods), and soil properties (e.g. salinity, soil texture and soil pH). A proper trial design will assure the robustness of the results if these factors were taken into consideration seriously. We also summarized knowledge about additives used in field trials, especially biological waste-derived amendments such as biochar, compost, sewage sludge and manure. According to the literature reviewed, controversy remains whether these amendments can promote the plant performance. In addition, the utilization of microorganisms and transgenic plants in field trials, and the associated biosafety concerns such as horizontal gene transfer were discussed. Future research should examine the ecological risks associated with phytomining and phytoremediation (e.g. the secondary migration of contaminants due to improper handling of harvested plants). It is suggested that the results of field studies should guide commercial applications of phytomining and phytoremediation. (Figure presented.).

AB - Plant-based technologies including phytomining, phytoextraction, phytodegradation, phytostabilization and phytovolatilization have drawn much attention during the last decade. To examine the feasibility of these nature-based solutions to accumulate, degrade, stabilize or volatize metal(loid)s and/or organic contaminants, an increasing number of field studies have been conducted. This review critically evaluates influencing factors in phytomining and phytoremediation approaches, including contaminant concentrations, fertilizer application and chelating agent addition, planting characteristics (e.g. plant density, seeding, cropping and harvesting methods), and soil properties (e.g. salinity, soil texture and soil pH). A proper trial design will assure the robustness of the results if these factors were taken into consideration seriously. We also summarized knowledge about additives used in field trials, especially biological waste-derived amendments such as biochar, compost, sewage sludge and manure. According to the literature reviewed, controversy remains whether these amendments can promote the plant performance. In addition, the utilization of microorganisms and transgenic plants in field trials, and the associated biosafety concerns such as horizontal gene transfer were discussed. Future research should examine the ecological risks associated with phytomining and phytoremediation (e.g. the secondary migration of contaminants due to improper handling of harvested plants). It is suggested that the results of field studies should guide commercial applications of phytomining and phytoremediation. (Figure presented.).

KW - biological waste

KW - hyperaccumulator

KW - nature-based solution

KW - Soil contamination

KW - sustainable remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077052623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077052623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10643389.2019.1705724

DO - 10.1080/10643389.2019.1705724

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077052623

JO - Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 1064-3389

ER -