Finger-assisted stretching technique for cesarean section

S. H. Song, Min Jeong Oh, Tak Kim, Jun Young Hur, H. S. Saw, Y. K. Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of two cesarean section methods, the finger-assisted stretching technique (FAST), based on a modified Joel-Cohen method, with the traditional technique. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 416 women who underwent cesarean sections at Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between May 1993 and December 2001 was performed. Of the 416 women, 283 underwent cesarean sections with FAST and 133 with the traditional technique. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter with FAST (15.3 vs. 42.6 min, P < .05), and FAST was associated with lower blood loss (601 vs. 928 mL, P < .05) and shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 6.5 days, P < .05). There were no significant differences in wound infection, voiding difficulty, and postoperative adhesions between the two methods. Conclusion: These results suggest that FAST may be the better technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)212-216
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume92
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Cesarean Section
Fingers
Wound Infection
Korea
Operative Time
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Cesarean section
  • Finger-assisted stretching technique
  • Traditional technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Finger-assisted stretching technique for cesarean section. / Song, S. H.; Oh, Min Jeong; Kim, Tak; Hur, Jun Young; Saw, H. S.; Park, Y. K.

In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 92, No. 3, 01.01.2006, p. 212-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3fc3cdbbfdee4beda04533b5551e2259,
title = "Finger-assisted stretching technique for cesarean section",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of two cesarean section methods, the finger-assisted stretching technique (FAST), based on a modified Joel-Cohen method, with the traditional technique. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 416 women who underwent cesarean sections at Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between May 1993 and December 2001 was performed. Of the 416 women, 283 underwent cesarean sections with FAST and 133 with the traditional technique. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter with FAST (15.3 vs. 42.6 min, P < .05), and FAST was associated with lower blood loss (601 vs. 928 mL, P < .05) and shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 6.5 days, P < .05). There were no significant differences in wound infection, voiding difficulty, and postoperative adhesions between the two methods. Conclusion: These results suggest that FAST may be the better technique.",
keywords = "Cesarean section, Finger-assisted stretching technique, Traditional technique",
author = "Song, {S. H.} and Oh, {Min Jeong} and Tak Kim and Hur, {Jun Young} and Saw, {H. S.} and Park, {Y. K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.028",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "212--216",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finger-assisted stretching technique for cesarean section

AU - Song, S. H.

AU - Oh, Min Jeong

AU - Kim, Tak

AU - Hur, Jun Young

AU - Saw, H. S.

AU - Park, Y. K.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of two cesarean section methods, the finger-assisted stretching technique (FAST), based on a modified Joel-Cohen method, with the traditional technique. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 416 women who underwent cesarean sections at Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between May 1993 and December 2001 was performed. Of the 416 women, 283 underwent cesarean sections with FAST and 133 with the traditional technique. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter with FAST (15.3 vs. 42.6 min, P < .05), and FAST was associated with lower blood loss (601 vs. 928 mL, P < .05) and shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 6.5 days, P < .05). There were no significant differences in wound infection, voiding difficulty, and postoperative adhesions between the two methods. Conclusion: These results suggest that FAST may be the better technique.

AB - Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of two cesarean section methods, the finger-assisted stretching technique (FAST), based on a modified Joel-Cohen method, with the traditional technique. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 416 women who underwent cesarean sections at Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between May 1993 and December 2001 was performed. Of the 416 women, 283 underwent cesarean sections with FAST and 133 with the traditional technique. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter with FAST (15.3 vs. 42.6 min, P < .05), and FAST was associated with lower blood loss (601 vs. 928 mL, P < .05) and shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 6.5 days, P < .05). There were no significant differences in wound infection, voiding difficulty, and postoperative adhesions between the two methods. Conclusion: These results suggest that FAST may be the better technique.

KW - Cesarean section

KW - Finger-assisted stretching technique

KW - Traditional technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33344455569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33344455569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.028

DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 16445916

AN - SCOPUS:33344455569

VL - 92

SP - 212

EP - 216

JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

IS - 3

ER -