Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study

Vincenzina Caputo, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, Riccardo Scarpa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ecological footprint of food transport can be communicated using carbon dioxide emissions (CO2 label) or by providing information about both the length of time and the mileage travelled (food miles label). We use stated choice data to estimate conventional unobserved taste heterogeneity models and extend them to a specification that also addresses attribute nonattendance. The implied posterior distributions of the marginal willingness to pay values are compared graphically and are used in validation regressions. We find strong bimodality of taste distribution as the emerging feature, with different groups of subjects having low and high valuations for these labels. The best fitting model shows that CO2 and food miles valuations are much correlated. CO2 valuations can be high even for those respondents expressing low valuations for food miles. However, the reverse is not true. Taken together, the results suggest that consumers tend to value the CO2 label at least as much and sometimes more than the food miles label.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-482
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Oct 1

Fingerprint

food miles
Food Labeling
food transport
Food Preferences
Carbon
carbon dioxide
Food
carbon
ecological footprint
willingness to pay
Carbon Dioxide
Stated choice
Co2
Carbon emissions
Labeling

Keywords

  • Attribute nonattendance
  • Choice experiment
  • Latent class analysis
  • Transport footprint
  • Willingness to pay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study. / Caputo, Vincenzina; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.; Scarpa, Riccardo.

In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 57, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 465-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9f201f2c2514cd3b986a2b0d61c91cf,
title = "Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study",
abstract = "The ecological footprint of food transport can be communicated using carbon dioxide emissions (CO2 label) or by providing information about both the length of time and the mileage travelled (food miles label). We use stated choice data to estimate conventional unobserved taste heterogeneity models and extend them to a specification that also addresses attribute nonattendance. The implied posterior distributions of the marginal willingness to pay values are compared graphically and are used in validation regressions. We find strong bimodality of taste distribution as the emerging feature, with different groups of subjects having low and high valuations for these labels. The best fitting model shows that CO2 and food miles valuations are much correlated. CO2 valuations can be high even for those respondents expressing low valuations for food miles. However, the reverse is not true. Taken together, the results suggest that consumers tend to value the CO2 label at least as much and sometimes more than the food miles label.",
keywords = "Attribute nonattendance, Choice experiment, Latent class analysis, Transport footprint, Willingness to pay",
author = "Vincenzina Caputo and {Nayga, Jr}, {Rodolfo M.} and Riccardo Scarpa",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8489.12014",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "465--482",
journal = "Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics",
issn = "1364-985X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study

AU - Caputo, Vincenzina

AU - Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.

AU - Scarpa, Riccardo

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - The ecological footprint of food transport can be communicated using carbon dioxide emissions (CO2 label) or by providing information about both the length of time and the mileage travelled (food miles label). We use stated choice data to estimate conventional unobserved taste heterogeneity models and extend them to a specification that also addresses attribute nonattendance. The implied posterior distributions of the marginal willingness to pay values are compared graphically and are used in validation regressions. We find strong bimodality of taste distribution as the emerging feature, with different groups of subjects having low and high valuations for these labels. The best fitting model shows that CO2 and food miles valuations are much correlated. CO2 valuations can be high even for those respondents expressing low valuations for food miles. However, the reverse is not true. Taken together, the results suggest that consumers tend to value the CO2 label at least as much and sometimes more than the food miles label.

AB - The ecological footprint of food transport can be communicated using carbon dioxide emissions (CO2 label) or by providing information about both the length of time and the mileage travelled (food miles label). We use stated choice data to estimate conventional unobserved taste heterogeneity models and extend them to a specification that also addresses attribute nonattendance. The implied posterior distributions of the marginal willingness to pay values are compared graphically and are used in validation regressions. We find strong bimodality of taste distribution as the emerging feature, with different groups of subjects having low and high valuations for these labels. The best fitting model shows that CO2 and food miles valuations are much correlated. CO2 valuations can be high even for those respondents expressing low valuations for food miles. However, the reverse is not true. Taken together, the results suggest that consumers tend to value the CO2 label at least as much and sometimes more than the food miles label.

KW - Attribute nonattendance

KW - Choice experiment

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Transport footprint

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885838884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885838884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8489.12014

DO - 10.1111/1467-8489.12014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885838884

VL - 57

SP - 465

EP - 482

JO - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

JF - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

SN - 1364-985X

IS - 4

ER -