Gender Wage Gap Accounting

The Role of Selection Bias

Michael Bar, Seik Kim, Oksana Leukhina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mulligan and Rubinstein (2008) (MR) argued that changing selection of working females on unobservable characteristics, from negative in the 1970s to positive in the 1990s, accounted for nearly the entire closing of the gender wage gap. We argue that their female wage equation estimates are inconsistent. Correcting this error substantially weakens the role of the rising selection bias (39 % versus 78 %) and strengthens the contribution of declining discrimination (42 % versus 7 %). Our findings resonate better with related literature. We also explain why our finding of positive selection in the 1970s provides additional support for MR’s main hypothesis that an exogenous rise in the market value of unobservable characteristics contributed to the closing of the gender gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1729-1750
Number of pages22
JournalDemography
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Oct 1

Fingerprint

wage
gender
trend
discrimination
market
literature

Keywords

  • Female labor force participation
  • Gender wage gap
  • Rising inequality
  • Selection bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Cite this

Gender Wage Gap Accounting : The Role of Selection Bias. / Bar, Michael; Kim, Seik; Leukhina, Oksana.

In: Demography, Vol. 52, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 1729-1750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bar, Michael ; Kim, Seik ; Leukhina, Oksana. / Gender Wage Gap Accounting : The Role of Selection Bias. In: Demography. 2015 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 1729-1750.
@article{0598fda4c5464a7dbb3d0f2937578dc3,
title = "Gender Wage Gap Accounting: The Role of Selection Bias",
abstract = "Mulligan and Rubinstein (2008) (MR) argued that changing selection of working females on unobservable characteristics, from negative in the 1970s to positive in the 1990s, accounted for nearly the entire closing of the gender wage gap. We argue that their female wage equation estimates are inconsistent. Correcting this error substantially weakens the role of the rising selection bias (39 {\%} versus 78 {\%}) and strengthens the contribution of declining discrimination (42 {\%} versus 7 {\%}). Our findings resonate better with related literature. We also explain why our finding of positive selection in the 1970s provides additional support for MR’s main hypothesis that an exogenous rise in the market value of unobservable characteristics contributed to the closing of the gender gap.",
keywords = "Female labor force participation, Gender wage gap, Rising inequality, Selection bias",
author = "Michael Bar and Seik Kim and Oksana Leukhina",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13524-015-0418-x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1729--1750",
journal = "Demography",
issn = "0070-3370",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender Wage Gap Accounting

T2 - The Role of Selection Bias

AU - Bar, Michael

AU - Kim, Seik

AU - Leukhina, Oksana

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Mulligan and Rubinstein (2008) (MR) argued that changing selection of working females on unobservable characteristics, from negative in the 1970s to positive in the 1990s, accounted for nearly the entire closing of the gender wage gap. We argue that their female wage equation estimates are inconsistent. Correcting this error substantially weakens the role of the rising selection bias (39 % versus 78 %) and strengthens the contribution of declining discrimination (42 % versus 7 %). Our findings resonate better with related literature. We also explain why our finding of positive selection in the 1970s provides additional support for MR’s main hypothesis that an exogenous rise in the market value of unobservable characteristics contributed to the closing of the gender gap.

AB - Mulligan and Rubinstein (2008) (MR) argued that changing selection of working females on unobservable characteristics, from negative in the 1970s to positive in the 1990s, accounted for nearly the entire closing of the gender wage gap. We argue that their female wage equation estimates are inconsistent. Correcting this error substantially weakens the role of the rising selection bias (39 % versus 78 %) and strengthens the contribution of declining discrimination (42 % versus 7 %). Our findings resonate better with related literature. We also explain why our finding of positive selection in the 1970s provides additional support for MR’s main hypothesis that an exogenous rise in the market value of unobservable characteristics contributed to the closing of the gender gap.

KW - Female labor force participation

KW - Gender wage gap

KW - Rising inequality

KW - Selection bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944513038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944513038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13524-015-0418-x

DO - 10.1007/s13524-015-0418-x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 1729

EP - 1750

JO - Demography

JF - Demography

SN - 0070-3370

IS - 5

ER -