Has the predictability of the yield spread changed?

Dong Heon Kim, Euihwan Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the stability of the predictive power of the yield spread for future GDP growth. We find that the ability of the spread to predict future GDP growth has weakened since 1984:Q1. Given the decomposition of the yield spread into the expectation component and the term premium component, we investigate the change in the predictability of both components and find that the term premium component appears to have lost the predictive power significantly while the predictive power of the expectation component has remained. We conjecture that since the 1984:Q1, the cyclical movement of the term premium seems to have been reduced due to the significant reduction in the volatility of US macroeconomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-463
Number of pages15
JournalSeoul Journal of Economics
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Yield spread
Predictability
Predictive power
Term premium
GDP growth
Macroeconomy
Decomposition

Keywords

  • Break
  • Expectations effect
  • Great Moderation
  • Predictability
  • Term premium effect
  • Yield spread

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Has the predictability of the yield spread changed? / Kim, Dong Heon; Park, Euihwan.

In: Seoul Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 449-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Dong Heon ; Park, Euihwan. / Has the predictability of the yield spread changed?. In: Seoul Journal of Economics. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 449-463.
@article{8d752a7fc66a409ea0235a474e963719,
title = "Has the predictability of the yield spread changed?",
abstract = "This paper examines the stability of the predictive power of the yield spread for future GDP growth. We find that the ability of the spread to predict future GDP growth has weakened since 1984:Q1. Given the decomposition of the yield spread into the expectation component and the term premium component, we investigate the change in the predictability of both components and find that the term premium component appears to have lost the predictive power significantly while the predictive power of the expectation component has remained. We conjecture that since the 1984:Q1, the cyclical movement of the term premium seems to have been reduced due to the significant reduction in the volatility of US macroeconomy.",
keywords = "Break, Expectations effect, Great Moderation, Predictability, Term premium effect, Yield spread",
author = "Kim, {Dong Heon} and Euihwan Park",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "449--463",
journal = "Seoul Journal of Economics",
issn = "1225-0279",
publisher = "Seoul National University",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Has the predictability of the yield spread changed?

AU - Kim, Dong Heon

AU - Park, Euihwan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the stability of the predictive power of the yield spread for future GDP growth. We find that the ability of the spread to predict future GDP growth has weakened since 1984:Q1. Given the decomposition of the yield spread into the expectation component and the term premium component, we investigate the change in the predictability of both components and find that the term premium component appears to have lost the predictive power significantly while the predictive power of the expectation component has remained. We conjecture that since the 1984:Q1, the cyclical movement of the term premium seems to have been reduced due to the significant reduction in the volatility of US macroeconomy.

AB - This paper examines the stability of the predictive power of the yield spread for future GDP growth. We find that the ability of the spread to predict future GDP growth has weakened since 1984:Q1. Given the decomposition of the yield spread into the expectation component and the term premium component, we investigate the change in the predictability of both components and find that the term premium component appears to have lost the predictive power significantly while the predictive power of the expectation component has remained. We conjecture that since the 1984:Q1, the cyclical movement of the term premium seems to have been reduced due to the significant reduction in the volatility of US macroeconomy.

KW - Break

KW - Expectations effect

KW - Great Moderation

KW - Predictability

KW - Term premium effect

KW - Yield spread

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058218144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058218144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058218144

VL - 31

SP - 449

EP - 463

JO - Seoul Journal of Economics

JF - Seoul Journal of Economics

SN - 1225-0279

IS - 4

ER -