How low is low enough? Evaluation of various risk-assessment models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

A Korean multicenter study

Sokbom Kang, Jong Min Lee, Jae Kwan Lee, Jae Weon Kim, Chi Heum Cho, Seok Mo Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Chan Yong Park, Ki Tae Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a standard for the evaluation of future models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer through estimation of performance of well-known surgicopathological models. Methods: Using the medical records of 947 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical management with lymphadenectomy, we retrospectively assessed the predictive performances of nodal metastasis of currently available models. Results: We evaluated three models included: 1) a model modified from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) pilot study; 2) one from the GOG-33 data; and 3) one from Mayo Clinic data. The three models showed similar negative predictive values ranging from 97.1% to 97.4%. Using Bayes' theorem, this can be translated into 2% of negative post-test probability when 10% of prevalence of lymph node metastasis was assumed. In addition, although the negative predictive value was similar among these models, the proportion that was classified as low-risk was significantly different between the studies (56.4%, 44.8%, and 30.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: The current study suggests that a false negativity of 2% or less should be a goal for determining clinical usefulness of preoperative or intraoperative prediction models for low-risk of nodal metastasis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-256
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Oncology
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct 11

Fingerprint

Endometrial Neoplasms
Multicenter Studies
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Bayes Theorem
Lymph Node Excision
Medical Records

Keywords

  • Endometrial cancer
  • Low-risk group
  • Lymph node dissection
  • Lymphadenectomy
  • Prediction
  • Sensitivity and specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

How low is low enough? Evaluation of various risk-assessment models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer : A Korean multicenter study. / Kang, Sokbom; Lee, Jong Min; Lee, Jae Kwan; Kim, Jae Weon; Cho, Chi Heum; Kim, Seok Mo; Park, Sang Yoon; Park, Chan Yong; Kim, Ki Tae.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 23, No. 4, 11.10.2012, p. 251-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kang, Sokbom ; Lee, Jong Min ; Lee, Jae Kwan ; Kim, Jae Weon ; Cho, Chi Heum ; Kim, Seok Mo ; Park, Sang Yoon ; Park, Chan Yong ; Kim, Ki Tae. / How low is low enough? Evaluation of various risk-assessment models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer : A Korean multicenter study. In: Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 251-256.
@article{578b48ce3ff24b6c818429bedee3df33,
title = "How low is low enough? Evaluation of various risk-assessment models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A Korean multicenter study",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a standard for the evaluation of future models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer through estimation of performance of well-known surgicopathological models. Methods: Using the medical records of 947 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical management with lymphadenectomy, we retrospectively assessed the predictive performances of nodal metastasis of currently available models. Results: We evaluated three models included: 1) a model modified from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) pilot study; 2) one from the GOG-33 data; and 3) one from Mayo Clinic data. The three models showed similar negative predictive values ranging from 97.1{\%} to 97.4{\%}. Using Bayes' theorem, this can be translated into 2{\%} of negative post-test probability when 10{\%} of prevalence of lymph node metastasis was assumed. In addition, although the negative predictive value was similar among these models, the proportion that was classified as low-risk was significantly different between the studies (56.4{\%}, 44.8{\%}, and 30.5{\%}, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: The current study suggests that a false negativity of 2{\%} or less should be a goal for determining clinical usefulness of preoperative or intraoperative prediction models for low-risk of nodal metastasis.",
keywords = "Endometrial cancer, Low-risk group, Lymph node dissection, Lymphadenectomy, Prediction, Sensitivity and specificity",
author = "Sokbom Kang and Lee, {Jong Min} and Lee, {Jae Kwan} and Kim, {Jae Weon} and Cho, {Chi Heum} and Kim, {Seok Mo} and Park, {Sang Yoon} and Park, {Chan Yong} and Kim, {Ki Tae}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.251",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "251--256",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "2005-0380",
publisher = "Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How low is low enough? Evaluation of various risk-assessment models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

T2 - A Korean multicenter study

AU - Kang, Sokbom

AU - Lee, Jong Min

AU - Lee, Jae Kwan

AU - Kim, Jae Weon

AU - Cho, Chi Heum

AU - Kim, Seok Mo

AU - Park, Sang Yoon

AU - Park, Chan Yong

AU - Kim, Ki Tae

PY - 2012/10/11

Y1 - 2012/10/11

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a standard for the evaluation of future models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer through estimation of performance of well-known surgicopathological models. Methods: Using the medical records of 947 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical management with lymphadenectomy, we retrospectively assessed the predictive performances of nodal metastasis of currently available models. Results: We evaluated three models included: 1) a model modified from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) pilot study; 2) one from the GOG-33 data; and 3) one from Mayo Clinic data. The three models showed similar negative predictive values ranging from 97.1% to 97.4%. Using Bayes' theorem, this can be translated into 2% of negative post-test probability when 10% of prevalence of lymph node metastasis was assumed. In addition, although the negative predictive value was similar among these models, the proportion that was classified as low-risk was significantly different between the studies (56.4%, 44.8%, and 30.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: The current study suggests that a false negativity of 2% or less should be a goal for determining clinical usefulness of preoperative or intraoperative prediction models for low-risk of nodal metastasis.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a standard for the evaluation of future models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer through estimation of performance of well-known surgicopathological models. Methods: Using the medical records of 947 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical management with lymphadenectomy, we retrospectively assessed the predictive performances of nodal metastasis of currently available models. Results: We evaluated three models included: 1) a model modified from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) pilot study; 2) one from the GOG-33 data; and 3) one from Mayo Clinic data. The three models showed similar negative predictive values ranging from 97.1% to 97.4%. Using Bayes' theorem, this can be translated into 2% of negative post-test probability when 10% of prevalence of lymph node metastasis was assumed. In addition, although the negative predictive value was similar among these models, the proportion that was classified as low-risk was significantly different between the studies (56.4%, 44.8%, and 30.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: The current study suggests that a false negativity of 2% or less should be a goal for determining clinical usefulness of preoperative or intraoperative prediction models for low-risk of nodal metastasis.

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Low-risk group

KW - Lymph node dissection

KW - Lymphadenectomy

KW - Prediction

KW - Sensitivity and specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867182268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867182268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.251

DO - 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.4.251

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 251

EP - 256

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 2005-0380

IS - 4

ER -