Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size

Jae Seon Eo, In Kook Chun, Jin Chul Paeng, Keon Wook Kang, Sang Mi Lee, Wonshik Han, Dong Young Noh, June Key Chung, Dong Soo Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Positron emission mammography (PEM) has been reported to have higher sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)due to higher spatial resolution. However, no direct evidence exists regarding the imaging sensitivity of PEM related to lesion size. In the present study, imaging sensitivity of PEM was investigated in relation to pathologically confirmed tumor size. A total of 113 breast lesions from 101 patients were included in the analysis. The patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PEM and whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT) before surgical resection, and images were analyzed visually and quantitatively using the tumor-to-normal-tissue uptake ratio (TNR). Tumors were classified into four groups based on size using pathologic results, and sensitivities of PEM and PET/CT were compared in the overall subjects and in each size group. In visual analysis, PEM showed significantly higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT (95% vs. 87%; P=0.004), which was more definite in the small-tumor groups. In quantitative analysis, the TNR of PEM was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in the small-tumor groups, whereas no difference was found in the overall group. With a cutoff TNR of 2.5, PEM showed significantly higher sensitivity than PET/CT in the overall and small-tumor groups. In conclusion, PEM had higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT, particularly in small tumors. The results suggest that PEM may be used for diagnosis and characterization of small lesions as a supplementary imaging modality for PET/CT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-71
Number of pages6
JournalBreast
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Mammography
Electrons
Neoplasms
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Positron-Emission Tomography
Breast

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • PET
  • Positron emission mammography
  • Sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Eo, J. S., Chun, I. K., Paeng, J. C., Kang, K. W., Lee, S. M., Han, W., ... Lee, D. S. (2012). Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. Breast, 21(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.002

Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. / Eo, Jae Seon; Chun, In Kook; Paeng, Jin Chul; Kang, Keon Wook; Lee, Sang Mi; Han, Wonshik; Noh, Dong Young; Chung, June Key; Lee, Dong Soo.

In: Breast, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 66-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eo, JS, Chun, IK, Paeng, JC, Kang, KW, Lee, SM, Han, W, Noh, DY, Chung, JK & Lee, DS 2012, 'Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size', Breast, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.002
Eo, Jae Seon ; Chun, In Kook ; Paeng, Jin Chul ; Kang, Keon Wook ; Lee, Sang Mi ; Han, Wonshik ; Noh, Dong Young ; Chung, June Key ; Lee, Dong Soo. / Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. In: Breast. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 66-71.
@article{77fd2017d2814752aa10155301e990b0,
title = "Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size",
abstract = "Positron emission mammography (PEM) has been reported to have higher sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)due to higher spatial resolution. However, no direct evidence exists regarding the imaging sensitivity of PEM related to lesion size. In the present study, imaging sensitivity of PEM was investigated in relation to pathologically confirmed tumor size. A total of 113 breast lesions from 101 patients were included in the analysis. The patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PEM and whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT) before surgical resection, and images were analyzed visually and quantitatively using the tumor-to-normal-tissue uptake ratio (TNR). Tumors were classified into four groups based on size using pathologic results, and sensitivities of PEM and PET/CT were compared in the overall subjects and in each size group. In visual analysis, PEM showed significantly higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT (95{\%} vs. 87{\%}; P=0.004), which was more definite in the small-tumor groups. In quantitative analysis, the TNR of PEM was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in the small-tumor groups, whereas no difference was found in the overall group. With a cutoff TNR of 2.5, PEM showed significantly higher sensitivity than PET/CT in the overall and small-tumor groups. In conclusion, PEM had higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT, particularly in small tumors. The results suggest that PEM may be used for diagnosis and characterization of small lesions as a supplementary imaging modality for PET/CT.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, PET, Positron emission mammography, Sensitivity",
author = "Eo, {Jae Seon} and Chun, {In Kook} and Paeng, {Jin Chul} and Kang, {Keon Wook} and Lee, {Sang Mi} and Wonshik Han and Noh, {Dong Young} and Chung, {June Key} and Lee, {Dong Soo}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "66--71",
journal = "Breast",
issn = "0960-9776",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size

AU - Eo, Jae Seon

AU - Chun, In Kook

AU - Paeng, Jin Chul

AU - Kang, Keon Wook

AU - Lee, Sang Mi

AU - Han, Wonshik

AU - Noh, Dong Young

AU - Chung, June Key

AU - Lee, Dong Soo

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Positron emission mammography (PEM) has been reported to have higher sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)due to higher spatial resolution. However, no direct evidence exists regarding the imaging sensitivity of PEM related to lesion size. In the present study, imaging sensitivity of PEM was investigated in relation to pathologically confirmed tumor size. A total of 113 breast lesions from 101 patients were included in the analysis. The patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PEM and whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT) before surgical resection, and images were analyzed visually and quantitatively using the tumor-to-normal-tissue uptake ratio (TNR). Tumors were classified into four groups based on size using pathologic results, and sensitivities of PEM and PET/CT were compared in the overall subjects and in each size group. In visual analysis, PEM showed significantly higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT (95% vs. 87%; P=0.004), which was more definite in the small-tumor groups. In quantitative analysis, the TNR of PEM was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in the small-tumor groups, whereas no difference was found in the overall group. With a cutoff TNR of 2.5, PEM showed significantly higher sensitivity than PET/CT in the overall and small-tumor groups. In conclusion, PEM had higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT, particularly in small tumors. The results suggest that PEM may be used for diagnosis and characterization of small lesions as a supplementary imaging modality for PET/CT.

AB - Positron emission mammography (PEM) has been reported to have higher sensitivity than whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)due to higher spatial resolution. However, no direct evidence exists regarding the imaging sensitivity of PEM related to lesion size. In the present study, imaging sensitivity of PEM was investigated in relation to pathologically confirmed tumor size. A total of 113 breast lesions from 101 patients were included in the analysis. The patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PEM and whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT) before surgical resection, and images were analyzed visually and quantitatively using the tumor-to-normal-tissue uptake ratio (TNR). Tumors were classified into four groups based on size using pathologic results, and sensitivities of PEM and PET/CT were compared in the overall subjects and in each size group. In visual analysis, PEM showed significantly higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT (95% vs. 87%; P=0.004), which was more definite in the small-tumor groups. In quantitative analysis, the TNR of PEM was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in the small-tumor groups, whereas no difference was found in the overall group. With a cutoff TNR of 2.5, PEM showed significantly higher sensitivity than PET/CT in the overall and small-tumor groups. In conclusion, PEM had higher imaging sensitivity than PET/CT, particularly in small tumors. The results suggest that PEM may be used for diagnosis and characterization of small lesions as a supplementary imaging modality for PET/CT.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - PET

KW - Positron emission mammography

KW - Sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856328477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856328477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21871801

AN - SCOPUS:84856328477

VL - 21

SP - 66

EP - 71

JO - Breast

JF - Breast

SN - 0960-9776

IS - 1

ER -