Impact of timing to source control in patients with septic shock: A prospective multi-center observational study

for the Korean Shock Society (KoSS) Investigators

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Current guidelines recommend that rapid source control should be adopted in patients not >6–12 h after sepsis is diagnosed. However, evidence level of this guideline is not specified, and there is no previous study on patients with septic shock visiting the emergency department (ED). Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of rapid source control in patients with septic shock visiting the ED. Materials and methods: In a prospective, observational, multicenter, registry-based study in 11 EDs, Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the independent effect of source control and time to source control on 28-day mortality. Results: Cox proportional hazard models revealed that 28-day mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent source control (HR 0.538 (0.389–0.744), p < .001). However, no significant association between the performance of source control after 6 h or 12 h from enrollment and 28-day mortality was noted. Conclusions: Patients with septic shock visiting the ED who underwent source control showed better outcomes than those who did not. We failed to demonstrate the performance of rapid source control reduced the 28-day mortality in septic shock patients. Further studies are required to determine the impact of rapid source control in sepsis and septic shock.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)176-182
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Critical Care
    Volume53
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019 Oct

    Keywords

    • Emergency service
    • Hospital
    • Infection control
    • Septic shock

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of timing to source control in patients with septic shock: A prospective multi-center observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this