Importance of no-rain measurements on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate

Chulsang Yoo, Kyoungjun Kim, Jeongho Choi, Eunho Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated four possible cases of comparing radar and rain gauge rain rate for the detection of mean-field bias. These four cases, or detection designs, consider in this study are: (1) design 1-uses all the data sets available, including zero radar rain rate and zero rain gauge rain rate, (2) design 2-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and zero or positive rain gauge rain rate, (3) design 3-uses the data sets of zero or positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate and (4) design 4-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate. A theoretical review of these four detection designs showed that only the design 1 causes no design bias, but designs 2, 3 and 4 can cause positive, negative and negative design biases, respectively. This theoretical result was also verified by applying these four designs to the rain rate field generated by a multi-dimensional rain rate model, as well as to that of the Mt Gwanak radar in Korea. The results from both applications showed that especially the design 4, which is generally used for the detection of mean-field bias of radar rain rate, causes a serious design bias; therefore, is inappropriate as a design for detecting the mean-field bias of radar rain rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)924-933
Number of pages10
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Mar 1

Fingerprint

gauge
radar
rain
comparison
rate

Keywords

  • Design bias
  • Detection design
  • Mean-field bias
  • Radar rain rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Importance of no-rain measurements on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate. / Yoo, Chulsang; Kim, Kyoungjun; Choi, Jeongho; Ha, Eunho.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.03.2010, p. 924-933.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoo, Chulsang ; Kim, Kyoungjun ; Choi, Jeongho ; Ha, Eunho. / Importance of no-rain measurements on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate. In: Hydrological Processes. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 924-933.
@article{4175a1475563404cb2ec6c8017bedc5c,
title = "Importance of no-rain measurements on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate",
abstract = "This study evaluated four possible cases of comparing radar and rain gauge rain rate for the detection of mean-field bias. These four cases, or detection designs, consider in this study are: (1) design 1-uses all the data sets available, including zero radar rain rate and zero rain gauge rain rate, (2) design 2-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and zero or positive rain gauge rain rate, (3) design 3-uses the data sets of zero or positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate and (4) design 4-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate. A theoretical review of these four detection designs showed that only the design 1 causes no design bias, but designs 2, 3 and 4 can cause positive, negative and negative design biases, respectively. This theoretical result was also verified by applying these four designs to the rain rate field generated by a multi-dimensional rain rate model, as well as to that of the Mt Gwanak radar in Korea. The results from both applications showed that especially the design 4, which is generally used for the detection of mean-field bias of radar rain rate, causes a serious design bias; therefore, is inappropriate as a design for detecting the mean-field bias of radar rain rate.",
keywords = "Design bias, Detection design, Mean-field bias, Radar rain rate",
author = "Chulsang Yoo and Kyoungjun Kim and Jeongho Choi and Eunho Ha",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.7537",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "924--933",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Importance of no-rain measurements on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate

AU - Yoo, Chulsang

AU - Kim, Kyoungjun

AU - Choi, Jeongho

AU - Ha, Eunho

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - This study evaluated four possible cases of comparing radar and rain gauge rain rate for the detection of mean-field bias. These four cases, or detection designs, consider in this study are: (1) design 1-uses all the data sets available, including zero radar rain rate and zero rain gauge rain rate, (2) design 2-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and zero or positive rain gauge rain rate, (3) design 3-uses the data sets of zero or positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate and (4) design 4-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate. A theoretical review of these four detection designs showed that only the design 1 causes no design bias, but designs 2, 3 and 4 can cause positive, negative and negative design biases, respectively. This theoretical result was also verified by applying these four designs to the rain rate field generated by a multi-dimensional rain rate model, as well as to that of the Mt Gwanak radar in Korea. The results from both applications showed that especially the design 4, which is generally used for the detection of mean-field bias of radar rain rate, causes a serious design bias; therefore, is inappropriate as a design for detecting the mean-field bias of radar rain rate.

AB - This study evaluated four possible cases of comparing radar and rain gauge rain rate for the detection of mean-field bias. These four cases, or detection designs, consider in this study are: (1) design 1-uses all the data sets available, including zero radar rain rate and zero rain gauge rain rate, (2) design 2-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and zero or positive rain gauge rain rate, (3) design 3-uses the data sets of zero or positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate and (4) design 4-uses the data sets of positive radar rain rate and positive rain gauge rain rate. A theoretical review of these four detection designs showed that only the design 1 causes no design bias, but designs 2, 3 and 4 can cause positive, negative and negative design biases, respectively. This theoretical result was also verified by applying these four designs to the rain rate field generated by a multi-dimensional rain rate model, as well as to that of the Mt Gwanak radar in Korea. The results from both applications showed that especially the design 4, which is generally used for the detection of mean-field bias of radar rain rate, causes a serious design bias; therefore, is inappropriate as a design for detecting the mean-field bias of radar rain rate.

KW - Design bias

KW - Detection design

KW - Mean-field bias

KW - Radar rain rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951657823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951657823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.7537

DO - 10.1002/hyp.7537

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 924

EP - 933

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 7

ER -