Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence: Proposal for a Comparative Framework

Frank Boons, Marian Chertow, Joo Young Park, Wouter Spekkink, Han Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis (IS), one of the founding notions within the field of industrial ecology, has diffused throughout significant parts of the world as a practice that can reduce the ecological impact of the industrial processes of groups of firms. In this article, we propose a fresh look at this research topic, building on the considerable advances that have been made in the last 15 years in understanding how IS comes about. We propose a conceptual and theoretical framework for taking on the challenge of comparative analysis at a global level. This requires developing an approach to address a solution to the problem of equivalence: the difficulty of comparing instances of IS across different institutional contexts. The proposed framework emphasizes IS as a process and attempts to address the obstacles to comparative study by (1) identifying terminology to examine IS variants, (2) providing a typology of IS dynamics, and (3) formulating key research questions to illuminate a way forward. In developing our argument, we build on the collective experiences of collaborative research efforts in North America, Europe, and Asia as evidenced in recent overviews of the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)938-952
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug 1

Fingerprint

symbiosis
equivalence
technical language
ecology
typology
firm
industrial ecology
experience
Group
ecological impact
terminology
comparative study
literature

Keywords

  • business strategy
  • comparative analysis
  • industrial ecology
  • industrial park
  • industrial symbiosis (IS)
  • social science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence : Proposal for a Comparative Framework. / Boons, Frank; Chertow, Marian; Park, Joo Young; Spekkink, Wouter; Shi, Han.

In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 938-952.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boons, Frank ; Chertow, Marian ; Park, Joo Young ; Spekkink, Wouter ; Shi, Han. / Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence : Proposal for a Comparative Framework. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 938-952.
@article{671d0da6411140c5b58ef58f20fd0434,
title = "Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence: Proposal for a Comparative Framework",
abstract = "Industrial symbiosis (IS), one of the founding notions within the field of industrial ecology, has diffused throughout significant parts of the world as a practice that can reduce the ecological impact of the industrial processes of groups of firms. In this article, we propose a fresh look at this research topic, building on the considerable advances that have been made in the last 15 years in understanding how IS comes about. We propose a conceptual and theoretical framework for taking on the challenge of comparative analysis at a global level. This requires developing an approach to address a solution to the problem of equivalence: the difficulty of comparing instances of IS across different institutional contexts. The proposed framework emphasizes IS as a process and attempts to address the obstacles to comparative study by (1) identifying terminology to examine IS variants, (2) providing a typology of IS dynamics, and (3) formulating key research questions to illuminate a way forward. In developing our argument, we build on the collective experiences of collaborative research efforts in North America, Europe, and Asia as evidenced in recent overviews of the literature.",
keywords = "business strategy, comparative analysis, industrial ecology, industrial park, industrial symbiosis (IS), social science",
author = "Frank Boons and Marian Chertow and Park, {Joo Young} and Wouter Spekkink and Han Shi",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jiec.12468",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "938--952",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Ecology",
issn = "1088-1980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence

T2 - Proposal for a Comparative Framework

AU - Boons, Frank

AU - Chertow, Marian

AU - Park, Joo Young

AU - Spekkink, Wouter

AU - Shi, Han

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Industrial symbiosis (IS), one of the founding notions within the field of industrial ecology, has diffused throughout significant parts of the world as a practice that can reduce the ecological impact of the industrial processes of groups of firms. In this article, we propose a fresh look at this research topic, building on the considerable advances that have been made in the last 15 years in understanding how IS comes about. We propose a conceptual and theoretical framework for taking on the challenge of comparative analysis at a global level. This requires developing an approach to address a solution to the problem of equivalence: the difficulty of comparing instances of IS across different institutional contexts. The proposed framework emphasizes IS as a process and attempts to address the obstacles to comparative study by (1) identifying terminology to examine IS variants, (2) providing a typology of IS dynamics, and (3) formulating key research questions to illuminate a way forward. In developing our argument, we build on the collective experiences of collaborative research efforts in North America, Europe, and Asia as evidenced in recent overviews of the literature.

AB - Industrial symbiosis (IS), one of the founding notions within the field of industrial ecology, has diffused throughout significant parts of the world as a practice that can reduce the ecological impact of the industrial processes of groups of firms. In this article, we propose a fresh look at this research topic, building on the considerable advances that have been made in the last 15 years in understanding how IS comes about. We propose a conceptual and theoretical framework for taking on the challenge of comparative analysis at a global level. This requires developing an approach to address a solution to the problem of equivalence: the difficulty of comparing instances of IS across different institutional contexts. The proposed framework emphasizes IS as a process and attempts to address the obstacles to comparative study by (1) identifying terminology to examine IS variants, (2) providing a typology of IS dynamics, and (3) formulating key research questions to illuminate a way forward. In developing our argument, we build on the collective experiences of collaborative research efforts in North America, Europe, and Asia as evidenced in recent overviews of the literature.

KW - business strategy

KW - comparative analysis

KW - industrial ecology

KW - industrial park

KW - industrial symbiosis (IS)

KW - social science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979747739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979747739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jiec.12468

DO - 10.1111/jiec.12468

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84979747739

VL - 21

SP - 938

EP - 952

JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology

JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology

SN - 1088-1980

IS - 4

ER -