Initial psychometric evaluation of the wayfinding effectiveness scale

Donna Algase, Gwi Ryung Son, Cynthia Beel-Bates, Junah Song, Yao Lan Yao, Elizabeth Beattie, Sara Leitsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluates three versions of the Wayfinding Effectiveness Scale (WES), developed to differentiate problems of wayfinding and wandering behavior of community-residing elders with dementia (EWD), in 266 dyads (EWD and caregiver) recruited from Alzheimer's Association chapters. Factor analyses yield a five-factor solution (explained variance = 62.6%): complex wayfinding goals, analytic strategies, global strategies, simple wayfinding goals, and being stimulus bound. Overall, internal consistencies are high: WES (.94-.95), and subscales are stable across all versions. Testretest reliability is acceptable for the overall WES and two subscales (complex and simple wayfinding goals) for the care recipient current behavior version. Construct validity is supported by the pattern of correlations among subscales and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) showing significant differences among the care recipient (current vs. prior behavior) and caregiver versions overall and for all subscales. Results support the WES as a valid and reliable measure of wayfinding effectiveness in persons with dementia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1015-1032
Number of pages18
JournalWestern Journal of Nursing Research
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Dec

Keywords

  • Community
  • Dementia
  • Instrument
  • Wandering
  • Wayfinding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Initial psychometric evaluation of the wayfinding effectiveness scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Algase, D., Son, G. R., Beel-Bates, C., Song, J., Lan Yao, Y., Beattie, E., & Leitsch, S. (2007). Initial psychometric evaluation of the wayfinding effectiveness scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 29(8), 1015-1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907303076