Invited commentary: On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism.

Carles Muntaner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their article in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849), Galea and Link identify important heuristics for our discipline. In this commentary, I build upon their ideas by arguing that (1) social epidemiology has become an Asian, European, Latin American, and African rather than just North American endeavor, (2) realism is better suited to social epidemiology than positivism, (3) more work on social mechanisms (social class relations, racial discrimination) is needed to increase the explanatory power of social epidemiology, (4) increased attention on (social) causal models will generate more innovative social interventions, and (5) social interventions should be conducted in full partnerships with affected populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)852-857
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume178
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Sep 15

Fingerprint

Epidemiology
Racism
Social Class
African Americans
Population
Power (Psychology)
Heuristics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Invited commentary : On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism. / Muntaner, Carles.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 178, No. 6, 15.09.2013, p. 852-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70ccb9689786481aaacf34e8777e3314,
title = "Invited commentary: On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism.",
abstract = "In their article in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849), Galea and Link identify important heuristics for our discipline. In this commentary, I build upon their ideas by arguing that (1) social epidemiology has become an Asian, European, Latin American, and African rather than just North American endeavor, (2) realism is better suited to social epidemiology than positivism, (3) more work on social mechanisms (social class relations, racial discrimination) is needed to increase the explanatory power of social epidemiology, (4) increased attention on (social) causal models will generate more innovative social interventions, and (5) social interventions should be conducted in full partnerships with affected populations.",
author = "Carles Muntaner",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "178",
pages = "852--857",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invited commentary

T2 - On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism.

AU - Muntaner, Carles

PY - 2013/9/15

Y1 - 2013/9/15

N2 - In their article in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849), Galea and Link identify important heuristics for our discipline. In this commentary, I build upon their ideas by arguing that (1) social epidemiology has become an Asian, European, Latin American, and African rather than just North American endeavor, (2) realism is better suited to social epidemiology than positivism, (3) more work on social mechanisms (social class relations, racial discrimination) is needed to increase the explanatory power of social epidemiology, (4) increased attention on (social) causal models will generate more innovative social interventions, and (5) social interventions should be conducted in full partnerships with affected populations.

AB - In their article in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):843-849), Galea and Link identify important heuristics for our discipline. In this commentary, I build upon their ideas by arguing that (1) social epidemiology has become an Asian, European, Latin American, and African rather than just North American endeavor, (2) realism is better suited to social epidemiology than positivism, (3) more work on social mechanisms (social class relations, racial discrimination) is needed to increase the explanatory power of social epidemiology, (4) increased attention on (social) causal models will generate more innovative social interventions, and (5) social interventions should be conducted in full partnerships with affected populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887337133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887337133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24008904

AN - SCOPUS:84887337133

VL - 178

SP - 852

EP - 857

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 6

ER -