Is uniform money always better than separate monies?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies that compare a uniform money with separate monies used models in which money is the only asset and in which individuals hold either zero or one unit of money. Here, the comparison is made using a model in which money coexists with a higher-return asset and in which individuals are permitted to hold richer portfolios of assets. The results show that a general conclusion is not possible. A uniform money has a higher expected utility than do separate monies in many examples. However, when the discount on bonds and uncertainty about the nationality of the trading partner are sufficiently high, then there are examples in which separate monies are better.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-42
Number of pages22
JournalOpen Economies Review
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Assets
Expected utility
Uncertainty
Nationality
Asset returns
Discount

Keywords

  • Random matching model
  • Separate monies
  • Uniform money

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Is uniform money always better than separate monies? / Lee, Manjong.

In: Open Economies Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 21-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b80acdb352c4e23a5e452d90f2290be,
title = "Is uniform money always better than separate monies?",
abstract = "Previous studies that compare a uniform money with separate monies used models in which money is the only asset and in which individuals hold either zero or one unit of money. Here, the comparison is made using a model in which money coexists with a higher-return asset and in which individuals are permitted to hold richer portfolios of assets. The results show that a general conclusion is not possible. A uniform money has a higher expected utility than do separate monies in many examples. However, when the discount on bonds and uncertainty about the nationality of the trading partner are sufficiently high, then there are examples in which separate monies are better.",
keywords = "Random matching model, Separate monies, Uniform money",
author = "Manjong Lee",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11079-007-9010-3",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "21--42",
journal = "Open Economies Review",
issn = "0923-7992",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is uniform money always better than separate monies?

AU - Lee, Manjong

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Previous studies that compare a uniform money with separate monies used models in which money is the only asset and in which individuals hold either zero or one unit of money. Here, the comparison is made using a model in which money coexists with a higher-return asset and in which individuals are permitted to hold richer portfolios of assets. The results show that a general conclusion is not possible. A uniform money has a higher expected utility than do separate monies in many examples. However, when the discount on bonds and uncertainty about the nationality of the trading partner are sufficiently high, then there are examples in which separate monies are better.

AB - Previous studies that compare a uniform money with separate monies used models in which money is the only asset and in which individuals hold either zero or one unit of money. Here, the comparison is made using a model in which money coexists with a higher-return asset and in which individuals are permitted to hold richer portfolios of assets. The results show that a general conclusion is not possible. A uniform money has a higher expected utility than do separate monies in many examples. However, when the discount on bonds and uncertainty about the nationality of the trading partner are sufficiently high, then there are examples in which separate monies are better.

KW - Random matching model

KW - Separate monies

KW - Uniform money

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38049186671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38049186671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11079-007-9010-3

DO - 10.1007/s11079-007-9010-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38049186671

VL - 19

SP - 21

EP - 42

JO - Open Economies Review

JF - Open Economies Review

SN - 0923-7992

IS - 1

ER -