Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm to verify the dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy through the stochastic property

Dongho Shin, Myonggeun Yoon, Sung Yong Park, Se Byeong Lee, Kwan Ho Cho, Chun Gun Park, Suk Lee, Dong Oh Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Dose distribution verification using a film for assuring the quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer using an m3 (Brain Lab.) did not complement the planned dose distribution at points having large gradients in dose variations, although the isocenter position had few discrepancies. An effective way to solve this problem would be precisely investigate the reason for this unexpected shift and then to recover it to the correct position. Using Mathlab 7.1, we have developed a new software program called "isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm" (ISOMSA). To find the optimal ISOMSA for finding isocenter shifts, we compared two methods, one based on a statistical method of minimizing the variance (SMMV) and the other based on a statistical method of minimizing the mean (SMMM) of the setup error. To evaluate the two methods, we compared verification results for seven patients at the National Cancer Center by using both methods. The results showed that the number of points revealing more than a 9 % difference in SMMV was 2.86 %, which was less than the percentage, 8.0 %, from SMMM. While the average of the maximum percentage difference between the plan and the film in SMMV was 14.06 %, the percentage was 15.23 % in SMMM. These experimental results suggest that SMMV works better than the SMMM in finding setup errors. Clinically, this result is very important because the dose difference between the plan and the film may be analyzed more precisely by using the proposed method to reduce systematic errors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1792-1797
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Korean Physical Society
Volume51
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov 1

Fingerprint

radiation therapy
dosage
shift
cancer
systematic errors
complement
brain
computer programs
gradients

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm
  • Statistical method of minimizing mean
  • Statistical method of minimizing variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm to verify the dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy through the stochastic property. / Shin, Dongho; Yoon, Myonggeun; Park, Sung Yong; Lee, Se Byeong; Cho, Kwan Ho; Park, Chun Gun; Lee, Suk; Shin, Dong Oh.

In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.11.2007, p. 1792-1797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shin, Dongho ; Yoon, Myonggeun ; Park, Sung Yong ; Lee, Se Byeong ; Cho, Kwan Ho ; Park, Chun Gun ; Lee, Suk ; Shin, Dong Oh. / Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm to verify the dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy through the stochastic property. In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 2007 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 1792-1797.
@article{a81069cd2098499e921134a143902c46,
title = "Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm to verify the dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy through the stochastic property",
abstract = "Dose distribution verification using a film for assuring the quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer using an m3 (Brain Lab.) did not complement the planned dose distribution at points having large gradients in dose variations, although the isocenter position had few discrepancies. An effective way to solve this problem would be precisely investigate the reason for this unexpected shift and then to recover it to the correct position. Using Mathlab 7.1, we have developed a new software program called {"}isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm{"} (ISOMSA). To find the optimal ISOMSA for finding isocenter shifts, we compared two methods, one based on a statistical method of minimizing the variance (SMMV) and the other based on a statistical method of minimizing the mean (SMMM) of the setup error. To evaluate the two methods, we compared verification results for seven patients at the National Cancer Center by using both methods. The results showed that the number of points revealing more than a 9 {\%} difference in SMMV was 2.86 {\%}, which was less than the percentage, 8.0 {\%}, from SMMM. While the average of the maximum percentage difference between the plan and the film in SMMV was 14.06 {\%}, the percentage was 15.23 {\%} in SMMM. These experimental results suggest that SMMV works better than the SMMM in finding setup errors. Clinically, this result is very important because the dose difference between the plan and the film may be analyzed more precisely by using the proposed method to reduce systematic errors.",
keywords = "IMRT, Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm, Statistical method of minimizing mean, Statistical method of minimizing variance",
author = "Dongho Shin and Myonggeun Yoon and Park, {Sung Yong} and Lee, {Se Byeong} and Cho, {Kwan Ho} and Park, {Chun Gun} and Suk Lee and Shin, {Dong Oh}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1792--1797",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Physical Society",
issn = "0374-4884",
publisher = "Korean Physical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm to verify the dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy through the stochastic property

AU - Shin, Dongho

AU - Yoon, Myonggeun

AU - Park, Sung Yong

AU - Lee, Se Byeong

AU - Cho, Kwan Ho

AU - Park, Chun Gun

AU - Lee, Suk

AU - Shin, Dong Oh

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Dose distribution verification using a film for assuring the quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer using an m3 (Brain Lab.) did not complement the planned dose distribution at points having large gradients in dose variations, although the isocenter position had few discrepancies. An effective way to solve this problem would be precisely investigate the reason for this unexpected shift and then to recover it to the correct position. Using Mathlab 7.1, we have developed a new software program called "isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm" (ISOMSA). To find the optimal ISOMSA for finding isocenter shifts, we compared two methods, one based on a statistical method of minimizing the variance (SMMV) and the other based on a statistical method of minimizing the mean (SMMM) of the setup error. To evaluate the two methods, we compared verification results for seven patients at the National Cancer Center by using both methods. The results showed that the number of points revealing more than a 9 % difference in SMMV was 2.86 %, which was less than the percentage, 8.0 %, from SMMM. While the average of the maximum percentage difference between the plan and the film in SMMV was 14.06 %, the percentage was 15.23 % in SMMM. These experimental results suggest that SMMV works better than the SMMM in finding setup errors. Clinically, this result is very important because the dose difference between the plan and the film may be analyzed more precisely by using the proposed method to reduce systematic errors.

AB - Dose distribution verification using a film for assuring the quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer using an m3 (Brain Lab.) did not complement the planned dose distribution at points having large gradients in dose variations, although the isocenter position had few discrepancies. An effective way to solve this problem would be precisely investigate the reason for this unexpected shift and then to recover it to the correct position. Using Mathlab 7.1, we have developed a new software program called "isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm" (ISOMSA). To find the optimal ISOMSA for finding isocenter shifts, we compared two methods, one based on a statistical method of minimizing the variance (SMMV) and the other based on a statistical method of minimizing the mean (SMMM) of the setup error. To evaluate the two methods, we compared verification results for seven patients at the National Cancer Center by using both methods. The results showed that the number of points revealing more than a 9 % difference in SMMV was 2.86 %, which was less than the percentage, 8.0 %, from SMMM. While the average of the maximum percentage difference between the plan and the film in SMMV was 14.06 %, the percentage was 15.23 % in SMMM. These experimental results suggest that SMMV works better than the SMMM in finding setup errors. Clinically, this result is very important because the dose difference between the plan and the film may be analyzed more precisely by using the proposed method to reduce systematic errors.

KW - IMRT

KW - Isocenter optimal matching shift algorithm

KW - Statistical method of minimizing mean

KW - Statistical method of minimizing variance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849090056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36849090056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1792

EP - 1797

JO - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

JF - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

SN - 0374-4884

IS - 5

ER -