Just say no to the TPP

A democratic setback for american and asian public health: Comment on “the trans-pacific partnership: Is it everything we feared for health?”

Carles Muntaner, Deb Finn Mahabir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article by Labonté, Schram, and Ruckert is a significant and timely analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labonté et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP’s political and policy processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-421
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume6
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Asian Americans
Public Health
Policy Making
Brunei
Health
International Cooperation
Peru
Vietnam
Chile
Malaysia
Singapore
Mexico
Legislation
New Zealand
Canada
Japan
Population

Keywords

  • Causality
  • Epistemology
  • Health policy
  • Politics
  • Scientific realism
  • Social mechanisms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{0ff709a381f7498f93195049d14e052f,
title = "Just say no to the TPP: A democratic setback for american and asian public health: Comment on “the trans-pacific partnership: Is it everything we feared for health?”",
abstract = "The article by Labont{\'e}, Schram, and Ruckert is a significant and timely analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labont{\'e} et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP’s political and policy processes.",
keywords = "Causality, Epistemology, Health policy, Politics, Scientific realism, Social mechanisms",
author = "Carles Muntaner and Mahabir, {Deb Finn}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "419--421",
journal = "International Journal of Health Policy and Management",
issn = "2322-5939",
publisher = "Kerman University of Medical Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just say no to the TPP

T2 - A democratic setback for american and asian public health: Comment on “the trans-pacific partnership: Is it everything we feared for health?”

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Mahabir, Deb Finn

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - The article by Labonté, Schram, and Ruckert is a significant and timely analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labonté et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP’s political and policy processes.

AB - The article by Labonté, Schram, and Ruckert is a significant and timely analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labonté et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP’s political and policy processes.

KW - Causality

KW - Epistemology

KW - Health policy

KW - Politics

KW - Scientific realism

KW - Social mechanisms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029227088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029227088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145

DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.145

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 419

EP - 421

JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

SN - 2322-5939

IS - 7

ER -