Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery

Jun Cheon, Marcelo A. Orvieto, Vipul R. Patel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Variations in prostate anatomy provide surgical challenges, the most common of which include the presence of large prostate, median lobes, post-transurethral prostate resection (TURP), prior abdominal surgery, and obese patients. Although it is wise, early in a surgeon’s experience, to select ideal candidates, these difficult cases are no longer contraindications to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). However, these variations in surgical anatomy significantly impact the learning curve and contribute to the potential for increased risk of complications. The key to avoiding problems is a standardized approach to recognition of the anatomy and dissection of the surgical planes. Identification of the bladder neck in large prostate and prior TURP is one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure; defining the bladder neck using the fat insertion line and the contour of the lateral prostate instead of traction of an inflated Foley catheter may provide a clue for this purpose. In case of a median lobe, elevating it using a robotic fourth arm will facilitate dissection of the bladder neck. If deemed necessary, reconstruction of the bladder neck should be performed burying the ureteral orifice out of the path of the anastomosis in cases of large median lobes. The operator should pay attention to inspect the ureteral orifice, as it often lies in close proximity to the borders of the prostate. The ability to recognize these anatomic variations and manage challenging intraoperative situations is an important aspect of RALP. The understanding of anatomic variations in these cases will allow for refinement of technique and the development of new techniques to optimize surgical outcomes. In this chapter, we will discuss the approach to various challenges encountered during RALP and provide advice based on our experience.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRobotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition
PublisherSpringer-Verlag London Ltd
Pages125-137
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781848828001
ISBN (Print)9781848827998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Prostate
Urinary Bladder
Prostatectomy
Anatomic Variation
Anatomy
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Aptitude
Neck Dissection
Learning Curve
Traction
Dissection
Catheters
Fats

Keywords

  • Difficult cases
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Roboticassisted

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cheon, J., Orvieto, M. A., & Patel, V. R. (2012). Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery. In Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition (pp. 125-137). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13

Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery. / Cheon, Jun; Orvieto, Marcelo A.; Patel, Vipul R.

Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2012. p. 125-137.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Cheon, J, Orvieto, MA & Patel, VR 2012, Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery. in Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, pp. 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13
Cheon J, Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery. In Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012. p. 125-137 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13
Cheon, Jun ; Orvieto, Marcelo A. ; Patel, Vipul R. / Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery. Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2012. pp. 125-137
@inbook{f23d88cdf0d04aedbfba02938ab24eee,
title = "Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery",
abstract = "Variations in prostate anatomy provide surgical challenges, the most common of which include the presence of large prostate, median lobes, post-transurethral prostate resection (TURP), prior abdominal surgery, and obese patients. Although it is wise, early in a surgeon’s experience, to select ideal candidates, these difficult cases are no longer contraindications to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). However, these variations in surgical anatomy significantly impact the learning curve and contribute to the potential for increased risk of complications. The key to avoiding problems is a standardized approach to recognition of the anatomy and dissection of the surgical planes. Identification of the bladder neck in large prostate and prior TURP is one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure; defining the bladder neck using the fat insertion line and the contour of the lateral prostate instead of traction of an inflated Foley catheter may provide a clue for this purpose. In case of a median lobe, elevating it using a robotic fourth arm will facilitate dissection of the bladder neck. If deemed necessary, reconstruction of the bladder neck should be performed burying the ureteral orifice out of the path of the anastomosis in cases of large median lobes. The operator should pay attention to inspect the ureteral orifice, as it often lies in close proximity to the borders of the prostate. The ability to recognize these anatomic variations and manage challenging intraoperative situations is an important aspect of RALP. The understanding of anatomic variations in these cases will allow for refinement of technique and the development of new techniques to optimize surgical outcomes. In this chapter, we will discuss the approach to various challenges encountered during RALP and provide advice based on our experience.",
keywords = "Difficult cases, Radical prostatectomy, Roboticassisted",
author = "Jun Cheon and Orvieto, {Marcelo A.} and Patel, {Vipul R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781848827998",
pages = "125--137",
booktitle = "Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Key elements to approaching difficult cases in robotic urologic surgery

AU - Cheon, Jun

AU - Orvieto, Marcelo A.

AU - Patel, Vipul R.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Variations in prostate anatomy provide surgical challenges, the most common of which include the presence of large prostate, median lobes, post-transurethral prostate resection (TURP), prior abdominal surgery, and obese patients. Although it is wise, early in a surgeon’s experience, to select ideal candidates, these difficult cases are no longer contraindications to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). However, these variations in surgical anatomy significantly impact the learning curve and contribute to the potential for increased risk of complications. The key to avoiding problems is a standardized approach to recognition of the anatomy and dissection of the surgical planes. Identification of the bladder neck in large prostate and prior TURP is one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure; defining the bladder neck using the fat insertion line and the contour of the lateral prostate instead of traction of an inflated Foley catheter may provide a clue for this purpose. In case of a median lobe, elevating it using a robotic fourth arm will facilitate dissection of the bladder neck. If deemed necessary, reconstruction of the bladder neck should be performed burying the ureteral orifice out of the path of the anastomosis in cases of large median lobes. The operator should pay attention to inspect the ureteral orifice, as it often lies in close proximity to the borders of the prostate. The ability to recognize these anatomic variations and manage challenging intraoperative situations is an important aspect of RALP. The understanding of anatomic variations in these cases will allow for refinement of technique and the development of new techniques to optimize surgical outcomes. In this chapter, we will discuss the approach to various challenges encountered during RALP and provide advice based on our experience.

AB - Variations in prostate anatomy provide surgical challenges, the most common of which include the presence of large prostate, median lobes, post-transurethral prostate resection (TURP), prior abdominal surgery, and obese patients. Although it is wise, early in a surgeon’s experience, to select ideal candidates, these difficult cases are no longer contraindications to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). However, these variations in surgical anatomy significantly impact the learning curve and contribute to the potential for increased risk of complications. The key to avoiding problems is a standardized approach to recognition of the anatomy and dissection of the surgical planes. Identification of the bladder neck in large prostate and prior TURP is one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure; defining the bladder neck using the fat insertion line and the contour of the lateral prostate instead of traction of an inflated Foley catheter may provide a clue for this purpose. In case of a median lobe, elevating it using a robotic fourth arm will facilitate dissection of the bladder neck. If deemed necessary, reconstruction of the bladder neck should be performed burying the ureteral orifice out of the path of the anastomosis in cases of large median lobes. The operator should pay attention to inspect the ureteral orifice, as it often lies in close proximity to the borders of the prostate. The ability to recognize these anatomic variations and manage challenging intraoperative situations is an important aspect of RALP. The understanding of anatomic variations in these cases will allow for refinement of technique and the development of new techniques to optimize surgical outcomes. In this chapter, we will discuss the approach to various challenges encountered during RALP and provide advice based on our experience.

KW - Difficult cases

KW - Radical prostatectomy

KW - Roboticassisted

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956779729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956779729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13

DO - 10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_13

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781848827998

SP - 125

EP - 137

BT - Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition

PB - Springer-Verlag London Ltd

ER -