Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: A prospective study assessing anastomotic safety

Jin Kim, Dong Jin Choi, Seon Hahn Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: It was hypothesized that a portion of the sigmoid colon and accompanying marginal artery can be preserved by omitting the complete mobilization of the splenic flexure, yet achieve safe anastomosis. This study was designed to compare the surgical safety of omitting splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic rectal surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Methodology: Between September 2006 and January 2008, laparoscopic rectal resection was performed in 160 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. Five patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) were excluded from this analysis. Morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture rate were analyzed in this group. Results: The median operative time was 225 min. There were no operative mortalities. SFM was required in 7 patients (4.5%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (8.4%), anastomotic bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.6%), and 3 patients (1.9%) had strictures. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19. Conclusions: A portion of the sigmoid colon can be safely used as the proximal bowel segment for anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery, and thus full mobilization of the splenic flexure can be omitted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1354-1358
Number of pages5
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume56
Issue number94-95
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Dec 18

Fingerprint

Transverse Colon
Prospective Studies
Safety
Anastomotic Leak
Sigmoid Colon
Rectal Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Pathologic Constriction
Hemorrhage
Mortality
Operative Time
Arteries
Lymph Nodes
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Anastomotic leak
  • Laparoscopy
  • Rectal cancer
  • Rectal resection
  • Splenic flexure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization : A prospective study assessing anastomotic safety. / Kim, Jin; Choi, Dong Jin; Kim, Seon Hahn.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 56, No. 94-95, 18.12.2009, p. 1354-1358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aaff193831cd4e059a2d23ad54b96f6a,
title = "Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: A prospective study assessing anastomotic safety",
abstract = "Background/Aims: It was hypothesized that a portion of the sigmoid colon and accompanying marginal artery can be preserved by omitting the complete mobilization of the splenic flexure, yet achieve safe anastomosis. This study was designed to compare the surgical safety of omitting splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic rectal surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Methodology: Between September 2006 and January 2008, laparoscopic rectal resection was performed in 160 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. Five patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) were excluded from this analysis. Morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture rate were analyzed in this group. Results: The median operative time was 225 min. There were no operative mortalities. SFM was required in 7 patients (4.5{\%}). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (8.4{\%}), anastomotic bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.6{\%}), and 3 patients (1.9{\%}) had strictures. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19. Conclusions: A portion of the sigmoid colon can be safely used as the proximal bowel segment for anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery, and thus full mobilization of the splenic flexure can be omitted.",
keywords = "Anastomotic leak, Laparoscopy, Rectal cancer, Rectal resection, Splenic flexure",
author = "Jin Kim and Choi, {Dong Jin} and Kim, {Seon Hahn}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "18",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1354--1358",
journal = "Hepato-Gastroenterology",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "94-95",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization

T2 - A prospective study assessing anastomotic safety

AU - Kim, Jin

AU - Choi, Dong Jin

AU - Kim, Seon Hahn

PY - 2009/12/18

Y1 - 2009/12/18

N2 - Background/Aims: It was hypothesized that a portion of the sigmoid colon and accompanying marginal artery can be preserved by omitting the complete mobilization of the splenic flexure, yet achieve safe anastomosis. This study was designed to compare the surgical safety of omitting splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic rectal surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Methodology: Between September 2006 and January 2008, laparoscopic rectal resection was performed in 160 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. Five patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) were excluded from this analysis. Morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture rate were analyzed in this group. Results: The median operative time was 225 min. There were no operative mortalities. SFM was required in 7 patients (4.5%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (8.4%), anastomotic bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.6%), and 3 patients (1.9%) had strictures. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19. Conclusions: A portion of the sigmoid colon can be safely used as the proximal bowel segment for anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery, and thus full mobilization of the splenic flexure can be omitted.

AB - Background/Aims: It was hypothesized that a portion of the sigmoid colon and accompanying marginal artery can be preserved by omitting the complete mobilization of the splenic flexure, yet achieve safe anastomosis. This study was designed to compare the surgical safety of omitting splenic flexure mobilization during laparoscopic rectal surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Methodology: Between September 2006 and January 2008, laparoscopic rectal resection was performed in 160 consecutive patients with rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. Five patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) were excluded from this analysis. Morbidity and mortality were recorded prospectively. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM), anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture rate were analyzed in this group. Results: The median operative time was 225 min. There were no operative mortalities. SFM was required in 7 patients (4.5%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 patients (8.4%), anastomotic bleeding occurred in 4 patients (2.6%), and 3 patients (1.9%) had strictures. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19. Conclusions: A portion of the sigmoid colon can be safely used as the proximal bowel segment for anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery, and thus full mobilization of the splenic flexure can be omitted.

KW - Anastomotic leak

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Rectal resection

KW - Splenic flexure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71949099921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71949099921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19950790

AN - SCOPUS:71949099921

VL - 56

SP - 1354

EP - 1358

JO - Hepato-Gastroenterology

JF - Hepato-Gastroenterology

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 94-95

ER -