Learning curve with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective study

Jeong Hyeon Ban, Young Hwii Ko, Seok Ho Kang, Hong Seok Park, Jun Cheon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and its characteristics in our initial experiences with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) with a new da Vinci-S surgical system. Materials and Methods: Through inspection of the patients who underwent RLRP by a single urologic surgeon from July 2007 to May 2008, the variables related to surgery were evaluated prospectively. Results: RLRP was performed in 50 patients. The patients' mean age (range) was 63 years (50-73 years), and 11 patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean total operation time was 281.6 min (190-455 min). The mean set-up time was 18.6 min (14-30 min), and the mean console time was 219.8 min (150-400 min). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375.7ml (200-800 ml). The overall margin-positive rate was 26% (13/50); it was 11.9% (5/42) for pT2 tumors and 100% (8/8) for pT3 tumors. Minor complications occurred in 5 patients. All complications were treated effectively with only conservative management. The total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL significantly decreased as the number of patients treated grew (Spearman's rank correlation, p<0.05; Rho=-0.49, -0.35, -0.54, -0.75, respectively). The mean total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL were significantly decreased in the last 35 patients who needed no transfusion (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery allowed the surgeon to complete the learning curve in a relatively short time period, with low perioperative complication rates and potentially good oncologic results, as indicated by the acceptable positive surgical margin in the patients with pathologically organ-confined disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-147
Number of pages8
JournalKorean Journal of Urology
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Robotics
Prostatectomy
Prospective Studies
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Robotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Learning curve with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : A prospective study. / Ban, Jeong Hyeon; Ko, Young Hwii; Kang, Seok Ho; Park, Hong Seok; Cheon, Jun.

In: Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 50, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 140-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f685c1b9d1ff44ba9e83458cd0a47e56,
title = "Learning curve with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective study",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and its characteristics in our initial experiences with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) with a new da Vinci-S surgical system. Materials and Methods: Through inspection of the patients who underwent RLRP by a single urologic surgeon from July 2007 to May 2008, the variables related to surgery were evaluated prospectively. Results: RLRP was performed in 50 patients. The patients' mean age (range) was 63 years (50-73 years), and 11 patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean total operation time was 281.6 min (190-455 min). The mean set-up time was 18.6 min (14-30 min), and the mean console time was 219.8 min (150-400 min). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375.7ml (200-800 ml). The overall margin-positive rate was 26{\%} (13/50); it was 11.9{\%} (5/42) for pT2 tumors and 100{\%} (8/8) for pT3 tumors. Minor complications occurred in 5 patients. All complications were treated effectively with only conservative management. The total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL significantly decreased as the number of patients treated grew (Spearman's rank correlation, p<0.05; Rho=-0.49, -0.35, -0.54, -0.75, respectively). The mean total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL were significantly decreased in the last 35 patients who needed no transfusion (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery allowed the surgeon to complete the learning curve in a relatively short time period, with low perioperative complication rates and potentially good oncologic results, as indicated by the acceptable positive surgical margin in the patients with pathologically organ-confined disease.",
keywords = "Laparoscopy, Prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms, Robotics",
author = "Ban, {Jeong Hyeon} and Ko, {Young Hwii} and Kang, {Seok Ho} and Park, {Hong Seok} and Jun Cheon",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4111/kju.2009.50.2.140",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "140--147",
journal = "Korean Journal of Urology",
issn = "2005-6737",
publisher = "Korean Urological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning curve with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Ban, Jeong Hyeon

AU - Ko, Young Hwii

AU - Kang, Seok Ho

AU - Park, Hong Seok

AU - Cheon, Jun

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and its characteristics in our initial experiences with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) with a new da Vinci-S surgical system. Materials and Methods: Through inspection of the patients who underwent RLRP by a single urologic surgeon from July 2007 to May 2008, the variables related to surgery were evaluated prospectively. Results: RLRP was performed in 50 patients. The patients' mean age (range) was 63 years (50-73 years), and 11 patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean total operation time was 281.6 min (190-455 min). The mean set-up time was 18.6 min (14-30 min), and the mean console time was 219.8 min (150-400 min). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375.7ml (200-800 ml). The overall margin-positive rate was 26% (13/50); it was 11.9% (5/42) for pT2 tumors and 100% (8/8) for pT3 tumors. Minor complications occurred in 5 patients. All complications were treated effectively with only conservative management. The total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL significantly decreased as the number of patients treated grew (Spearman's rank correlation, p<0.05; Rho=-0.49, -0.35, -0.54, -0.75, respectively). The mean total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL were significantly decreased in the last 35 patients who needed no transfusion (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery allowed the surgeon to complete the learning curve in a relatively short time period, with low perioperative complication rates and potentially good oncologic results, as indicated by the acceptable positive surgical margin in the patients with pathologically organ-confined disease.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the learning curve and its characteristics in our initial experiences with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) with a new da Vinci-S surgical system. Materials and Methods: Through inspection of the patients who underwent RLRP by a single urologic surgeon from July 2007 to May 2008, the variables related to surgery were evaluated prospectively. Results: RLRP was performed in 50 patients. The patients' mean age (range) was 63 years (50-73 years), and 11 patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery. The mean total operation time was 281.6 min (190-455 min). The mean set-up time was 18.6 min (14-30 min), and the mean console time was 219.8 min (150-400 min). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375.7ml (200-800 ml). The overall margin-positive rate was 26% (13/50); it was 11.9% (5/42) for pT2 tumors and 100% (8/8) for pT3 tumors. Minor complications occurred in 5 patients. All complications were treated effectively with only conservative management. The total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL significantly decreased as the number of patients treated grew (Spearman's rank correlation, p<0.05; Rho=-0.49, -0.35, -0.54, -0.75, respectively). The mean total operation time, set-up time, console time, and EBL were significantly decreased in the last 35 patients who needed no transfusion (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of robotic surgery allowed the surgeon to complete the learning curve in a relatively short time period, with low perioperative complication rates and potentially good oncologic results, as indicated by the acceptable positive surgical margin in the patients with pathologically organ-confined disease.

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

KW - Robotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849123599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849123599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4111/kju.2009.50.2.140

DO - 10.4111/kju.2009.50.2.140

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61849123599

VL - 50

SP - 140

EP - 147

JO - Korean Journal of Urology

JF - Korean Journal of Urology

SN - 2005-6737

IS - 2

ER -