Learning to recognize objects

Guy Wallis, Heinrich Bülthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence from neurophysiological and psychological studies is coming together to shed light on how we represent and recognize objects. This review describes evidence supporting two major hypotheses: the first is that objects are represented in a mosaic-like form in which objects are encoded by combinations of complex, reusable features, rather than two-dimensional templates, or three-dimensional models. The second hypothesis is that transform-invariant representations of objects are learnt through experience, and that this learning is affected by the temporal sequence in which different views of the objects are seen, as well as by their physical appearance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-31
Number of pages10
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999 Jan 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learning to recognize objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this