Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of and learning curves for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy

Jun Seok Moon, Man Sik Park, Jong Han Kim, You-Jin Jang, Sungsoo Park, Young Jae Mok, Seung Joo Kim, Chong Suk Kim, Seong-Heum Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Before expanding our indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy to advanced gastric cancer and adopting reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy, we analyzed and audited the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for adenocarcinoma; this was done during the adoptive period at our institution through the comparative analysis of short-term surgical outcomes and learning curves (LCs) of two surgeons with different careers. Materials and Methods: A detailed comparative analysis of the LCs and surgical outcomes was done for the respective first 95 and 111 LADGs performed by two surgeons between July, 2006 and June, 2011. The LCs were fitted by using the non-linear ordinary least squares estimation method. Results: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 14.6% and 0.0%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the morbidity rates (12.6% vs. 16.2%, P=0.467). More than 25 lymph nodes were retrieved by each surgeon during LADG procedures. The LCs of both surgeons were distinct. In this study, a stable plateau of the LC was not achieved by both surgeons even after performing 90 LADGs. Conclusions: Regardless of the experience with gastrectomy or laparoscopic surgery for other organs, or the age of surgeon, the outcome was quite acceptable; the learning process differ according to the surgeon’s experience and individual characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastric Cancer
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Gastrectomy
Laparoscopy
Morbidity
Surgeons
Least-Squares Analysis
Stomach Neoplasms
Adenocarcinoma
Lymph Nodes
Learning
Mortality

Keywords

  • Gastrectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Learning curve
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of and learning curves for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. / Moon, Jun Seok; Park, Man Sik; Kim, Jong Han; Jang, You-Jin; Park, Sungsoo; Mok, Young Jae; Kim, Seung Joo; Kim, Chong Suk; Park, Seong-Heum.

In: Journal of Gastric Cancer, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 29-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f67e2aed3454a98b5b9a122e70d491c,
title = "Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of and learning curves for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy",
abstract = "Purpose: Before expanding our indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy to advanced gastric cancer and adopting reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy, we analyzed and audited the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for adenocarcinoma; this was done during the adoptive period at our institution through the comparative analysis of short-term surgical outcomes and learning curves (LCs) of two surgeons with different careers. Materials and Methods: A detailed comparative analysis of the LCs and surgical outcomes was done for the respective first 95 and 111 LADGs performed by two surgeons between July, 2006 and June, 2011. The LCs were fitted by using the non-linear ordinary least squares estimation method. Results: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 14.6{\%} and 0.0{\%}, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the morbidity rates (12.6{\%} vs. 16.2{\%}, P=0.467). More than 25 lymph nodes were retrieved by each surgeon during LADG procedures. The LCs of both surgeons were distinct. In this study, a stable plateau of the LC was not achieved by both surgeons even after performing 90 LADGs. Conclusions: Regardless of the experience with gastrectomy or laparoscopic surgery for other organs, or the age of surgeon, the outcome was quite acceptable; the learning process differ according to the surgeon’s experience and individual characteristics.",
keywords = "Gastrectomy, Laparoscopy, Learning curve, Treatment outcome",
author = "Moon, {Jun Seok} and Park, {Man Sik} and Kim, {Jong Han} and You-Jin Jang and Sungsoo Park and Mok, {Young Jae} and Kim, {Seung Joo} and Kim, {Chong Suk} and Seong-Heum Park",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.29",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "29--38",
journal = "Journal of Gastric Cancer",
issn = "2093-582X",
publisher = "Korean Gastric Cancer Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of and learning curves for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy

AU - Moon, Jun Seok

AU - Park, Man Sik

AU - Kim, Jong Han

AU - Jang, You-Jin

AU - Park, Sungsoo

AU - Mok, Young Jae

AU - Kim, Seung Joo

AU - Kim, Chong Suk

AU - Park, Seong-Heum

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Before expanding our indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy to advanced gastric cancer and adopting reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy, we analyzed and audited the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for adenocarcinoma; this was done during the adoptive period at our institution through the comparative analysis of short-term surgical outcomes and learning curves (LCs) of two surgeons with different careers. Materials and Methods: A detailed comparative analysis of the LCs and surgical outcomes was done for the respective first 95 and 111 LADGs performed by two surgeons between July, 2006 and June, 2011. The LCs were fitted by using the non-linear ordinary least squares estimation method. Results: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 14.6% and 0.0%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the morbidity rates (12.6% vs. 16.2%, P=0.467). More than 25 lymph nodes were retrieved by each surgeon during LADG procedures. The LCs of both surgeons were distinct. In this study, a stable plateau of the LC was not achieved by both surgeons even after performing 90 LADGs. Conclusions: Regardless of the experience with gastrectomy or laparoscopic surgery for other organs, or the age of surgeon, the outcome was quite acceptable; the learning process differ according to the surgeon’s experience and individual characteristics.

AB - Purpose: Before expanding our indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy to advanced gastric cancer and adopting reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy, we analyzed and audited the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for adenocarcinoma; this was done during the adoptive period at our institution through the comparative analysis of short-term surgical outcomes and learning curves (LCs) of two surgeons with different careers. Materials and Methods: A detailed comparative analysis of the LCs and surgical outcomes was done for the respective first 95 and 111 LADGs performed by two surgeons between July, 2006 and June, 2011. The LCs were fitted by using the non-linear ordinary least squares estimation method. Results: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 14.6% and 0.0%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the morbidity rates (12.6% vs. 16.2%, P=0.467). More than 25 lymph nodes were retrieved by each surgeon during LADG procedures. The LCs of both surgeons were distinct. In this study, a stable plateau of the LC was not achieved by both surgeons even after performing 90 LADGs. Conclusions: Regardless of the experience with gastrectomy or laparoscopic surgery for other organs, or the age of surgeon, the outcome was quite acceptable; the learning process differ according to the surgeon’s experience and individual characteristics.

KW - Gastrectomy

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Learning curve

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961375205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961375205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.29

DO - 10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.29

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961375205

VL - 15

SP - 29

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Gastric Cancer

JF - Journal of Gastric Cancer

SN - 2093-582X

IS - 1

ER -