Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia

Kwang Won Park, Rey An NiÑo Garcia, Chastity Amor Rejuso, Jung Woo Choi, Hae Ryong Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Although bilateral lower-limb lengthening has been performed on patients with achondroplasia, the outcomes for the tibia and femur in terms of radiographic parameters, clinical results, and complications have not been compared with each other. We proposed 1) to compare the radiological outcomes of femoral and tibial lengthening and 2) to investigate the differences of complications related to lengthening. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (average age, 14 years 4 months) with achondroplasia who underwent bilateral limb lengthening between 2004 and 2012. All patients first underwent bilateral tibial lengthening, and at 9–48 months (average, 17.8 months) after this procedure, bilateral femoral lengthening was performed. We analyzed the pixel value ratio (PVR) and characteristics of the callus of the lengthened area on serial radiographs. The external fixation index (EFI) and healing index (HI) were computed to compare tibial and femoral lengthening. The complications related to lengthening were assessed. Results: The average gain in length was 8.4 cm for the femur and 9.8 cm for the tibia. The PVR, EFI, and HI of the tibia were significantly better than those of the femur. Fewer complications were found during the lengthening of the tibia than during the lengthening of the femur. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening had a significantly lower complication rate and a higher callus formation rate than femoral lengthening. Our findings suggest that bilateral limb lengthening (tibia, followed by femur) remains a reasonable option; however, we should be more cautious when performing femoral lengthening in selected patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1656-1662
Number of pages7
JournalYonsei Medical Journal
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Achondroplasia
Thigh
Tibia
Femur
Extremities
Bony Callus
Lower Extremity

Keywords

  • Achondroplasia
  • Bone lengthening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Park, K. W., Garcia, R. A. N., Rejuso, C. A., Choi, J. W., & Song, H. R. (2015). Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(6), 1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1656

Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia. / Park, Kwang Won; Garcia, Rey An NiÑo; Rejuso, Chastity Amor; Choi, Jung Woo; Song, Hae Ryong.

In: Yonsei Medical Journal, Vol. 56, No. 6, 01.11.2015, p. 1656-1662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, KW, Garcia, RAN, Rejuso, CA, Choi, JW & Song, HR 2015, 'Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia', Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1656
Park, Kwang Won ; Garcia, Rey An NiÑo ; Rejuso, Chastity Amor ; Choi, Jung Woo ; Song, Hae Ryong. / Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia. In: Yonsei Medical Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 56, No. 6. pp. 1656-1662.
@article{501790ff443d4a649d1fc2cc79426471,
title = "Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia",
abstract = "Purpose: Although bilateral lower-limb lengthening has been performed on patients with achondroplasia, the outcomes for the tibia and femur in terms of radiographic parameters, clinical results, and complications have not been compared with each other. We proposed 1) to compare the radiological outcomes of femoral and tibial lengthening and 2) to investigate the differences of complications related to lengthening. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (average age, 14 years 4 months) with achondroplasia who underwent bilateral limb lengthening between 2004 and 2012. All patients first underwent bilateral tibial lengthening, and at 9–48 months (average, 17.8 months) after this procedure, bilateral femoral lengthening was performed. We analyzed the pixel value ratio (PVR) and characteristics of the callus of the lengthened area on serial radiographs. The external fixation index (EFI) and healing index (HI) were computed to compare tibial and femoral lengthening. The complications related to lengthening were assessed. Results: The average gain in length was 8.4 cm for the femur and 9.8 cm for the tibia. The PVR, EFI, and HI of the tibia were significantly better than those of the femur. Fewer complications were found during the lengthening of the tibia than during the lengthening of the femur. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening had a significantly lower complication rate and a higher callus formation rate than femoral lengthening. Our findings suggest that bilateral limb lengthening (tibia, followed by femur) remains a reasonable option; however, we should be more cautious when performing femoral lengthening in selected patients.",
keywords = "Achondroplasia, Bone lengthening",
author = "Park, {Kwang Won} and Garcia, {Rey An Ni{\~N}o} and Rejuso, {Chastity Amor} and Choi, {Jung Woo} and Song, {Hae Ryong}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1656",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1656--1662",
journal = "Yonsei Medical Journal",
issn = "0513-5796",
publisher = "Yonsei University College of Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limb lengthening in patients with achondroplasia

AU - Park, Kwang Won

AU - Garcia, Rey An NiÑo

AU - Rejuso, Chastity Amor

AU - Choi, Jung Woo

AU - Song, Hae Ryong

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Although bilateral lower-limb lengthening has been performed on patients with achondroplasia, the outcomes for the tibia and femur in terms of radiographic parameters, clinical results, and complications have not been compared with each other. We proposed 1) to compare the radiological outcomes of femoral and tibial lengthening and 2) to investigate the differences of complications related to lengthening. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (average age, 14 years 4 months) with achondroplasia who underwent bilateral limb lengthening between 2004 and 2012. All patients first underwent bilateral tibial lengthening, and at 9–48 months (average, 17.8 months) after this procedure, bilateral femoral lengthening was performed. We analyzed the pixel value ratio (PVR) and characteristics of the callus of the lengthened area on serial radiographs. The external fixation index (EFI) and healing index (HI) were computed to compare tibial and femoral lengthening. The complications related to lengthening were assessed. Results: The average gain in length was 8.4 cm for the femur and 9.8 cm for the tibia. The PVR, EFI, and HI of the tibia were significantly better than those of the femur. Fewer complications were found during the lengthening of the tibia than during the lengthening of the femur. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening had a significantly lower complication rate and a higher callus formation rate than femoral lengthening. Our findings suggest that bilateral limb lengthening (tibia, followed by femur) remains a reasonable option; however, we should be more cautious when performing femoral lengthening in selected patients.

AB - Purpose: Although bilateral lower-limb lengthening has been performed on patients with achondroplasia, the outcomes for the tibia and femur in terms of radiographic parameters, clinical results, and complications have not been compared with each other. We proposed 1) to compare the radiological outcomes of femoral and tibial lengthening and 2) to investigate the differences of complications related to lengthening. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (average age, 14 years 4 months) with achondroplasia who underwent bilateral limb lengthening between 2004 and 2012. All patients first underwent bilateral tibial lengthening, and at 9–48 months (average, 17.8 months) after this procedure, bilateral femoral lengthening was performed. We analyzed the pixel value ratio (PVR) and characteristics of the callus of the lengthened area on serial radiographs. The external fixation index (EFI) and healing index (HI) were computed to compare tibial and femoral lengthening. The complications related to lengthening were assessed. Results: The average gain in length was 8.4 cm for the femur and 9.8 cm for the tibia. The PVR, EFI, and HI of the tibia were significantly better than those of the femur. Fewer complications were found during the lengthening of the tibia than during the lengthening of the femur. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening had a significantly lower complication rate and a higher callus formation rate than femoral lengthening. Our findings suggest that bilateral limb lengthening (tibia, followed by femur) remains a reasonable option; however, we should be more cautious when performing femoral lengthening in selected patients.

KW - Achondroplasia

KW - Bone lengthening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944128601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944128601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1656

DO - 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1656

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1656

EP - 1662

JO - Yonsei Medical Journal

JF - Yonsei Medical Journal

SN - 0513-5796

IS - 6

ER -