Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer

Hangseok Choi, Chulho Lee, The Bao Nguyen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The linear curve fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in-situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic material. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible aquifer, these methods have difficulties to fit a straight line to the semi-logarithmic plot of the test data that shows a concave-upward curvature because the linear curve fitting methods ignore the role of the compressibility or specific storage (S s) of an aquifer. The comparison of the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method is made for a partially-penetrating well geometry to show analytically that the Hvorslev method estimates higher hydraulic conductivity than the Bouwer and Rice method except that the well intake section locates very close to the bottom of the aquifer. The effect of fitting a straight line to the slug test data is evaluated along with the dimensionless compressibility parameter (α) ranging from 0.001 to 1. Copyright ASCE 2007.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGeotechnical Special Publication
Pages16
Number of pages1
Edition162
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventGeo-Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechnics - Denver, CO, United States
Duration: 2007 Feb 182007 Feb 21

Other

OtherGeo-Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechnics
CountryUnited States
CityDenver, CO
Period07/2/1807/2/21

Fingerprint

slug test
slugs
Curve fitting
Aquifers
aquifers
Hydraulic conductivity
aquifer
Compressibility
testing
compressibility
rice
methodology
hydraulic conductivity
Geometry
method
rapid methods
curvature
geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Choi, H., Lee, C., & Nguyen, T. B. (2007). Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer. In Geotechnical Special Publication (162 ed., pp. 16) https://doi.org/10.1061/40906(225)16

Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer. / Choi, Hangseok; Lee, Chulho; Nguyen, The Bao.

Geotechnical Special Publication. 162. ed. 2007. p. 16.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Choi, H, Lee, C & Nguyen, TB 2007, Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer. in Geotechnical Special Publication. 162 edn, pp. 16, Geo-Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechnics, Denver, CO, United States, 07/2/18. https://doi.org/10.1061/40906(225)16
Choi, Hangseok ; Lee, Chulho ; Nguyen, The Bao. / Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer. Geotechnical Special Publication. 162. ed. 2007. pp. 16
@inproceedings{7913f47ab4d74833ad349ba0dc8fe00d,
title = "Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer",
abstract = "The linear curve fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in-situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic material. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible aquifer, these methods have difficulties to fit a straight line to the semi-logarithmic plot of the test data that shows a concave-upward curvature because the linear curve fitting methods ignore the role of the compressibility or specific storage (S s) of an aquifer. The comparison of the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method is made for a partially-penetrating well geometry to show analytically that the Hvorslev method estimates higher hydraulic conductivity than the Bouwer and Rice method except that the well intake section locates very close to the bottom of the aquifer. The effect of fitting a straight line to the slug test data is evaluated along with the dimensionless compressibility parameter (α) ranging from 0.001 to 1. Copyright ASCE 2007.",
author = "Hangseok Choi and Chulho Lee and Nguyen, {The Bao}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1061/40906(225)16",
language = "English",
pages = "16",
booktitle = "Geotechnical Special Publication",
edition = "162",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Linear curve fitting methods for analyzing slug tests in compressible aquifer

AU - Choi, Hangseok

AU - Lee, Chulho

AU - Nguyen, The Bao

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The linear curve fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in-situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic material. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible aquifer, these methods have difficulties to fit a straight line to the semi-logarithmic plot of the test data that shows a concave-upward curvature because the linear curve fitting methods ignore the role of the compressibility or specific storage (S s) of an aquifer. The comparison of the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method is made for a partially-penetrating well geometry to show analytically that the Hvorslev method estimates higher hydraulic conductivity than the Bouwer and Rice method except that the well intake section locates very close to the bottom of the aquifer. The effect of fitting a straight line to the slug test data is evaluated along with the dimensionless compressibility parameter (α) ranging from 0.001 to 1. Copyright ASCE 2007.

AB - The linear curve fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in-situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic material. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible aquifer, these methods have difficulties to fit a straight line to the semi-logarithmic plot of the test data that shows a concave-upward curvature because the linear curve fitting methods ignore the role of the compressibility or specific storage (S s) of an aquifer. The comparison of the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method is made for a partially-penetrating well geometry to show analytically that the Hvorslev method estimates higher hydraulic conductivity than the Bouwer and Rice method except that the well intake section locates very close to the bottom of the aquifer. The effect of fitting a straight line to the slug test data is evaluated along with the dimensionless compressibility parameter (α) ranging from 0.001 to 1. Copyright ASCE 2007.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548554274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548554274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/40906(225)16

DO - 10.1061/40906(225)16

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 16

BT - Geotechnical Special Publication

ER -