Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction

A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography

Sang Youn Kim, Jeong Yeon Cho, Joongyub Lee, Sung Il Hwang, Min Hoan Moon, Eun Ju Lee, Seong Sook Hong, Chan Kyo Kim, Kyeong Ah Kim, Sung Bin Park, Deuk Jae Sung, Yongsoo Kim, You Me Kim, Sung Il Jung, Sung Eun Rha, Dong Won Kim, Hyun Lee, Youngsup Shim, Inpyeong Hwang, Sungmin Woo & 1 others Hyuck Jae Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. Results: The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. Conclusion: The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1119-1129
Number of pages11
JournalKorean Journal of Radiology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Urography
Iodine
Contrast Media
Randomized Controlled Trials
Tomography
Noise
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Urinary Tract

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Contrast media
  • Double dose reduction
  • Low dose
  • Urography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction : A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography. / Kim, Sang Youn; Cho, Jeong Yeon; Lee, Joongyub; Hwang, Sung Il; Moon, Min Hoan; Lee, Eun Ju; Hong, Seong Sook; Kim, Chan Kyo; Kim, Kyeong Ah; Park, Sung Bin; Sung, Deuk Jae; Kim, Yongsoo; Kim, You Me; Jung, Sung Il; Rha, Sung Eun; Kim, Dong Won; Lee, Hyun; Shim, Youngsup; Hwang, Inpyeong; Woo, Sungmin; Choi, Hyuck Jae.

In: Korean Journal of Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 1119-1129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, SY, Cho, JY, Lee, J, Hwang, SI, Moon, MH, Lee, EJ, Hong, SS, Kim, CK, Kim, KA, Park, SB, Sung, DJ, Kim, Y, Kim, YM, Jung, SI, Rha, SE, Kim, DW, Lee, H, Shim, Y, Hwang, I, Woo, S & Choi, HJ 2018, 'Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction: A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography', Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1119
Kim, Sang Youn ; Cho, Jeong Yeon ; Lee, Joongyub ; Hwang, Sung Il ; Moon, Min Hoan ; Lee, Eun Ju ; Hong, Seong Sook ; Kim, Chan Kyo ; Kim, Kyeong Ah ; Park, Sung Bin ; Sung, Deuk Jae ; Kim, Yongsoo ; Kim, You Me ; Jung, Sung Il ; Rha, Sung Eun ; Kim, Dong Won ; Lee, Hyun ; Shim, Youngsup ; Hwang, Inpyeong ; Woo, Sungmin ; Choi, Hyuck Jae. / Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction : A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography. In: Korean Journal of Radiology. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 1119-1129.
@article{e2e1ad7d34bc451cb73c6d1476fcf716,
title = "Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction: A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. Results: The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. Conclusion: The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Contrast media, Double dose reduction, Low dose, Urography",
author = "Kim, {Sang Youn} and Cho, {Jeong Yeon} and Joongyub Lee and Hwang, {Sung Il} and Moon, {Min Hoan} and Lee, {Eun Ju} and Hong, {Seong Sook} and Kim, {Chan Kyo} and Kim, {Kyeong Ah} and Park, {Sung Bin} and Sung, {Deuk Jae} and Yongsoo Kim and Kim, {You Me} and Jung, {Sung Il} and Rha, {Sung Eun} and Kim, {Dong Won} and Hyun Lee and Youngsup Shim and Inpyeong Hwang and Sungmin Woo and Choi, {Hyuck Jae}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1119",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1119--1129",
journal = "Korean Journal of Radiology",
issn = "1229-6929",
publisher = "Korean Radiological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-tube-voltage CT urography using low-concentration-iodine contrast media and iterative reconstruction

T2 - A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for comparison with conventional CT urography

AU - Kim, Sang Youn

AU - Cho, Jeong Yeon

AU - Lee, Joongyub

AU - Hwang, Sung Il

AU - Moon, Min Hoan

AU - Lee, Eun Ju

AU - Hong, Seong Sook

AU - Kim, Chan Kyo

AU - Kim, Kyeong Ah

AU - Park, Sung Bin

AU - Sung, Deuk Jae

AU - Kim, Yongsoo

AU - Kim, You Me

AU - Jung, Sung Il

AU - Rha, Sung Eun

AU - Kim, Dong Won

AU - Lee, Hyun

AU - Shim, Youngsup

AU - Hwang, Inpyeong

AU - Woo, Sungmin

AU - Choi, Hyuck Jae

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. Results: The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. Conclusion: The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.

AB - Objective: To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. Results: The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. Conclusion: The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Contrast media

KW - Double dose reduction

KW - Low dose

KW - Urography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055591641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055591641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1119

DO - 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1119

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1119

EP - 1129

JO - Korean Journal of Radiology

JF - Korean Journal of Radiology

SN - 1229-6929

IS - 6

ER -