Magnetic evaluation of sediment provenance in the northern east china sea using fuzzy c-means cluster analysis

Wonnyon Kim, Seong-Jae Doh, Yongjae Yu, Yong Il Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To identify the provenance of fine-grained sediments in the northern East China Sea, various magnetic parameters indicating concentration (magnetic susceptibility, susceptibility of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χARM), and saturation of isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM)), mineral composition (S300=-IRM-300mT/SIRM and HIRM (%)=50 (SIRM-IRM300mT)/SIRM), and grain size (frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility (χFD), χARM/SIRM, and S20=IRM20mT/SIRM) were measured from surface sediments collected at 98 regularly spaced sites. As an unbiased analytic tool, fuzzy clustering analysis was performed on data from 97 sites except an outlier. Each dataset for each site comprised magnetic parameters representing ultrafine superparamagnetic (χFD), fine single-domain or pseudo-single-domain (χARM/SIRM), and coarse multidomain (S20) fractions, and the relative dominance of low- and high-coercivity minerals (S300 and HIRM (%), respectively). The statistical analysis yielded four clusters, indicating that the sediments in the study area can be differentiated magnetically. Of the magnetic properties of the cluster centers, the most distinctive feature of cluster 1 is a predominance of coarse-grained magnetic minerals (highest S20 value), while the contribution of high-coercivity minerals is highest in cluster 2 (highest HIRM (%) value). Ultrafine- and fine-grained fractions are prominent in cluster 3 (highest χFD and χARM/SIRM values), while cluster 4 has the highest ratio of low- to high-coercivity minerals (highest S300 value). Related to sediment provenance, the sediments of cluster 1 are interpreted to have been derived from the Yangtze River in China. The old Yellow River deposits are the primary source of sediments in cluster 2. Sediments in cluster 3 were probably transported from Taiwan or the Northwest Pacific by the Taiwan Warm Current or the Kuroshio Current, respectively, while Korean river deposits are the most probable sources of sediments in cluster 4.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-19
Number of pages11
JournalMarine Geology
Volume337
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Cluster analysis
remanent magnetization
provenance
cluster analysis
Magnetization
Sediments
Minerals
Saturation magnetization
Coercive force
saturation
sediment
Rivers
Magnetic susceptibility
Deposits
mineral
magnetic susceptibility
sea
evaluation
Fuzzy clustering
river

Keywords

  • East China Sea
  • Fuzzy cluster
  • Magnetic properties
  • Sediment provenance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geology

Cite this

Magnetic evaluation of sediment provenance in the northern east china sea using fuzzy c-means cluster analysis. / Kim, Wonnyon; Doh, Seong-Jae; Yu, Yongjae; Lee, Yong Il.

In: Marine Geology, Vol. 337, 01.03.2013, p. 9-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54b4e2055b654204a96ed8b6b14e6387,
title = "Magnetic evaluation of sediment provenance in the northern east china sea using fuzzy c-means cluster analysis",
abstract = "To identify the provenance of fine-grained sediments in the northern East China Sea, various magnetic parameters indicating concentration (magnetic susceptibility, susceptibility of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χARM), and saturation of isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM)), mineral composition (S300=-IRM-300mT/SIRM and HIRM ({\%})=50 (SIRM-IRM300mT)/SIRM), and grain size (frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility (χFD), χARM/SIRM, and S20=IRM20mT/SIRM) were measured from surface sediments collected at 98 regularly spaced sites. As an unbiased analytic tool, fuzzy clustering analysis was performed on data from 97 sites except an outlier. Each dataset for each site comprised magnetic parameters representing ultrafine superparamagnetic (χFD), fine single-domain or pseudo-single-domain (χARM/SIRM), and coarse multidomain (S20) fractions, and the relative dominance of low- and high-coercivity minerals (S300 and HIRM ({\%}), respectively). The statistical analysis yielded four clusters, indicating that the sediments in the study area can be differentiated magnetically. Of the magnetic properties of the cluster centers, the most distinctive feature of cluster 1 is a predominance of coarse-grained magnetic minerals (highest S20 value), while the contribution of high-coercivity minerals is highest in cluster 2 (highest HIRM ({\%}) value). Ultrafine- and fine-grained fractions are prominent in cluster 3 (highest χFD and χARM/SIRM values), while cluster 4 has the highest ratio of low- to high-coercivity minerals (highest S300 value). Related to sediment provenance, the sediments of cluster 1 are interpreted to have been derived from the Yangtze River in China. The old Yellow River deposits are the primary source of sediments in cluster 2. Sediments in cluster 3 were probably transported from Taiwan or the Northwest Pacific by the Taiwan Warm Current or the Kuroshio Current, respectively, while Korean river deposits are the most probable sources of sediments in cluster 4.",
keywords = "East China Sea, Fuzzy cluster, Magnetic properties, Sediment provenance",
author = "Wonnyon Kim and Seong-Jae Doh and Yongjae Yu and Lee, {Yong Il}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.margeo.2013.01.001",
language = "English",
volume = "337",
pages = "9--19",
journal = "Marine Geology",
issn = "0025-3227",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic evaluation of sediment provenance in the northern east china sea using fuzzy c-means cluster analysis

AU - Kim, Wonnyon

AU - Doh, Seong-Jae

AU - Yu, Yongjae

AU - Lee, Yong Il

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - To identify the provenance of fine-grained sediments in the northern East China Sea, various magnetic parameters indicating concentration (magnetic susceptibility, susceptibility of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χARM), and saturation of isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM)), mineral composition (S300=-IRM-300mT/SIRM and HIRM (%)=50 (SIRM-IRM300mT)/SIRM), and grain size (frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility (χFD), χARM/SIRM, and S20=IRM20mT/SIRM) were measured from surface sediments collected at 98 regularly spaced sites. As an unbiased analytic tool, fuzzy clustering analysis was performed on data from 97 sites except an outlier. Each dataset for each site comprised magnetic parameters representing ultrafine superparamagnetic (χFD), fine single-domain or pseudo-single-domain (χARM/SIRM), and coarse multidomain (S20) fractions, and the relative dominance of low- and high-coercivity minerals (S300 and HIRM (%), respectively). The statistical analysis yielded four clusters, indicating that the sediments in the study area can be differentiated magnetically. Of the magnetic properties of the cluster centers, the most distinctive feature of cluster 1 is a predominance of coarse-grained magnetic minerals (highest S20 value), while the contribution of high-coercivity minerals is highest in cluster 2 (highest HIRM (%) value). Ultrafine- and fine-grained fractions are prominent in cluster 3 (highest χFD and χARM/SIRM values), while cluster 4 has the highest ratio of low- to high-coercivity minerals (highest S300 value). Related to sediment provenance, the sediments of cluster 1 are interpreted to have been derived from the Yangtze River in China. The old Yellow River deposits are the primary source of sediments in cluster 2. Sediments in cluster 3 were probably transported from Taiwan or the Northwest Pacific by the Taiwan Warm Current or the Kuroshio Current, respectively, while Korean river deposits are the most probable sources of sediments in cluster 4.

AB - To identify the provenance of fine-grained sediments in the northern East China Sea, various magnetic parameters indicating concentration (magnetic susceptibility, susceptibility of anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χARM), and saturation of isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM)), mineral composition (S300=-IRM-300mT/SIRM and HIRM (%)=50 (SIRM-IRM300mT)/SIRM), and grain size (frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility (χFD), χARM/SIRM, and S20=IRM20mT/SIRM) were measured from surface sediments collected at 98 regularly spaced sites. As an unbiased analytic tool, fuzzy clustering analysis was performed on data from 97 sites except an outlier. Each dataset for each site comprised magnetic parameters representing ultrafine superparamagnetic (χFD), fine single-domain or pseudo-single-domain (χARM/SIRM), and coarse multidomain (S20) fractions, and the relative dominance of low- and high-coercivity minerals (S300 and HIRM (%), respectively). The statistical analysis yielded four clusters, indicating that the sediments in the study area can be differentiated magnetically. Of the magnetic properties of the cluster centers, the most distinctive feature of cluster 1 is a predominance of coarse-grained magnetic minerals (highest S20 value), while the contribution of high-coercivity minerals is highest in cluster 2 (highest HIRM (%) value). Ultrafine- and fine-grained fractions are prominent in cluster 3 (highest χFD and χARM/SIRM values), while cluster 4 has the highest ratio of low- to high-coercivity minerals (highest S300 value). Related to sediment provenance, the sediments of cluster 1 are interpreted to have been derived from the Yangtze River in China. The old Yellow River deposits are the primary source of sediments in cluster 2. Sediments in cluster 3 were probably transported from Taiwan or the Northwest Pacific by the Taiwan Warm Current or the Kuroshio Current, respectively, while Korean river deposits are the most probable sources of sediments in cluster 4.

KW - East China Sea

KW - Fuzzy cluster

KW - Magnetic properties

KW - Sediment provenance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877676238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877676238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.margeo.2013.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.margeo.2013.01.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877676238

VL - 337

SP - 9

EP - 19

JO - Marine Geology

JF - Marine Geology

SN - 0025-3227

ER -