Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)

Daisuke Hachinohe, Myung Ho Jeong, Shigeru Saito, Khurshid Ahmed, Seung Hwan Hwang, Min Goo Lee, Doo Sun Sim, Keun Ho Park, Ju Han Kim, Young Joon Hong, Youngkeun Ahn, Jung Chaee Kang, Jong Hyun Kim, Shung Chull Chae, Young Jo Kim, Seung Ho Hur, In Whan Seong, Taek Jong Hong, Donghoon Choi, Myeong Chan Cho & 7 others Chong Jin Kim, Ki Bae Seung, Wook Sung Chung, Yang Soo Jang, Seung-Woon Rha, Jang Ho Bae, Seung Jung Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among early invasive (EI), deferred invasive (DI), and conservative strategies in patients with acute nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). High-risk patients with NSTEMI are believed to fare better with an EI strategy, but the optimal treatment for patients with NSTEMI and CKD is not known. In total 5,185 patients with acute NSTEMI were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and followed for 1 year. Patients were divided into EI, DI, and conservative treatment groups and classified into 4 stages using references from the National Kidney Foundation. The invasive EI and DI groups were compared to the conservative groups, and the EI and DI groups were compared according to each renal function stage. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates in the conservative group were significantly higher than in the invasive groups except for the severe CKD group. The benefit of the EI over the DI strategy, although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, tended to decrease as renal function decreased. In conclusion, in the management of NSTEMI, an invasive strategy decreased mortality compared to a conservative strategy except for severe CKD. In the timing of an invasive strategy, the EI strategy was observed to be superior to the DI strategy in patients with mild CKD; however, this tendency reversed as renal function decreased. When patients with NSTEMI have severe CKD, a conservative or DI strategy with prescription of cardioprotective medications and prevention of further deterioration in renal function should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-213
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume108
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jul 15

Fingerprint

Korea
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Registries
Myocardial Infarction
Kidney
Mortality
Prescriptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). / Hachinohe, Daisuke; Jeong, Myung Ho; Saito, Shigeru; Ahmed, Khurshid; Hwang, Seung Hwan; Lee, Min Goo; Sim, Doo Sun; Park, Keun Ho; Kim, Ju Han; Hong, Young Joon; Ahn, Youngkeun; Kang, Jung Chaee; Kim, Jong Hyun; Chae, Shung Chull; Kim, Young Jo; Hur, Seung Ho; Seong, In Whan; Hong, Taek Jong; Choi, Donghoon; Cho, Myeong Chan; Kim, Chong Jin; Seung, Ki Bae; Chung, Wook Sung; Jang, Yang Soo; Rha, Seung-Woon; Bae, Jang Ho; Park, Seung Jung.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 108, No. 2, 15.07.2011, p. 206-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hachinohe, D, Jeong, MH, Saito, S, Ahmed, K, Hwang, SH, Lee, MG, Sim, DS, Park, KH, Kim, JH, Hong, YJ, Ahn, Y, Kang, JC, Kim, JH, Chae, SC, Kim, YJ, Hur, SH, Seong, IW, Hong, TJ, Choi, D, Cho, MC, Kim, CJ, Seung, KB, Chung, WS, Jang, YS, Rha, S-W, Bae, JH & Park, SJ 2011, 'Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)', American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.025
Hachinohe, Daisuke ; Jeong, Myung Ho ; Saito, Shigeru ; Ahmed, Khurshid ; Hwang, Seung Hwan ; Lee, Min Goo ; Sim, Doo Sun ; Park, Keun Ho ; Kim, Ju Han ; Hong, Young Joon ; Ahn, Youngkeun ; Kang, Jung Chaee ; Kim, Jong Hyun ; Chae, Shung Chull ; Kim, Young Jo ; Hur, Seung Ho ; Seong, In Whan ; Hong, Taek Jong ; Choi, Donghoon ; Cho, Myeong Chan ; Kim, Chong Jin ; Seung, Ki Bae ; Chung, Wook Sung ; Jang, Yang Soo ; Rha, Seung-Woon ; Bae, Jang Ho ; Park, Seung Jung. / Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry). In: American Journal of Cardiology. 2011 ; Vol. 108, No. 2. pp. 206-213.
@article{51d6590d9fc542fd91b867cdf0b82e20,
title = "Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among early invasive (EI), deferred invasive (DI), and conservative strategies in patients with acute nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). High-risk patients with NSTEMI are believed to fare better with an EI strategy, but the optimal treatment for patients with NSTEMI and CKD is not known. In total 5,185 patients with acute NSTEMI were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and followed for 1 year. Patients were divided into EI, DI, and conservative treatment groups and classified into 4 stages using references from the National Kidney Foundation. The invasive EI and DI groups were compared to the conservative groups, and the EI and DI groups were compared according to each renal function stage. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates in the conservative group were significantly higher than in the invasive groups except for the severe CKD group. The benefit of the EI over the DI strategy, although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, tended to decrease as renal function decreased. In conclusion, in the management of NSTEMI, an invasive strategy decreased mortality compared to a conservative strategy except for severe CKD. In the timing of an invasive strategy, the EI strategy was observed to be superior to the DI strategy in patients with mild CKD; however, this tendency reversed as renal function decreased. When patients with NSTEMI have severe CKD, a conservative or DI strategy with prescription of cardioprotective medications and prevention of further deterioration in renal function should be considered.",
author = "Daisuke Hachinohe and Jeong, {Myung Ho} and Shigeru Saito and Khurshid Ahmed and Hwang, {Seung Hwan} and Lee, {Min Goo} and Sim, {Doo Sun} and Park, {Keun Ho} and Kim, {Ju Han} and Hong, {Young Joon} and Youngkeun Ahn and Kang, {Jung Chaee} and Kim, {Jong Hyun} and Chae, {Shung Chull} and Kim, {Young Jo} and Hur, {Seung Ho} and Seong, {In Whan} and Hong, {Taek Jong} and Donghoon Choi and Cho, {Myeong Chan} and Kim, {Chong Jin} and Seung, {Ki Bae} and Chung, {Wook Sung} and Jang, {Yang Soo} and Seung-Woon Rha and Bae, {Jang Ho} and Park, {Seung Jung}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.025",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "206--213",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of NonST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)

AU - Hachinohe, Daisuke

AU - Jeong, Myung Ho

AU - Saito, Shigeru

AU - Ahmed, Khurshid

AU - Hwang, Seung Hwan

AU - Lee, Min Goo

AU - Sim, Doo Sun

AU - Park, Keun Ho

AU - Kim, Ju Han

AU - Hong, Young Joon

AU - Ahn, Youngkeun

AU - Kang, Jung Chaee

AU - Kim, Jong Hyun

AU - Chae, Shung Chull

AU - Kim, Young Jo

AU - Hur, Seung Ho

AU - Seong, In Whan

AU - Hong, Taek Jong

AU - Choi, Donghoon

AU - Cho, Myeong Chan

AU - Kim, Chong Jin

AU - Seung, Ki Bae

AU - Chung, Wook Sung

AU - Jang, Yang Soo

AU - Rha, Seung-Woon

AU - Bae, Jang Ho

AU - Park, Seung Jung

PY - 2011/7/15

Y1 - 2011/7/15

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among early invasive (EI), deferred invasive (DI), and conservative strategies in patients with acute nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). High-risk patients with NSTEMI are believed to fare better with an EI strategy, but the optimal treatment for patients with NSTEMI and CKD is not known. In total 5,185 patients with acute NSTEMI were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and followed for 1 year. Patients were divided into EI, DI, and conservative treatment groups and classified into 4 stages using references from the National Kidney Foundation. The invasive EI and DI groups were compared to the conservative groups, and the EI and DI groups were compared according to each renal function stage. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates in the conservative group were significantly higher than in the invasive groups except for the severe CKD group. The benefit of the EI over the DI strategy, although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, tended to decrease as renal function decreased. In conclusion, in the management of NSTEMI, an invasive strategy decreased mortality compared to a conservative strategy except for severe CKD. In the timing of an invasive strategy, the EI strategy was observed to be superior to the DI strategy in patients with mild CKD; however, this tendency reversed as renal function decreased. When patients with NSTEMI have severe CKD, a conservative or DI strategy with prescription of cardioprotective medications and prevention of further deterioration in renal function should be considered.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among early invasive (EI), deferred invasive (DI), and conservative strategies in patients with acute nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). High-risk patients with NSTEMI are believed to fare better with an EI strategy, but the optimal treatment for patients with NSTEMI and CKD is not known. In total 5,185 patients with acute NSTEMI were enrolled from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and followed for 1 year. Patients were divided into EI, DI, and conservative treatment groups and classified into 4 stages using references from the National Kidney Foundation. The invasive EI and DI groups were compared to the conservative groups, and the EI and DI groups were compared according to each renal function stage. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates in the conservative group were significantly higher than in the invasive groups except for the severe CKD group. The benefit of the EI over the DI strategy, although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, tended to decrease as renal function decreased. In conclusion, in the management of NSTEMI, an invasive strategy decreased mortality compared to a conservative strategy except for severe CKD. In the timing of an invasive strategy, the EI strategy was observed to be superior to the DI strategy in patients with mild CKD; however, this tendency reversed as renal function decreased. When patients with NSTEMI have severe CKD, a conservative or DI strategy with prescription of cardioprotective medications and prevention of further deterioration in renal function should be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959769762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959769762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.025

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.025

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 206

EP - 213

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 2

ER -