Medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve

Cadaver and nerve conduction studies

Byung Kyu Park, Hye Ryoung Bun, Miriam Hwang, Jonghwa Hong, Dong Hwee Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To establish a reliable technique for nerve conduction study (NCS) of medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). Methods: The distribution of SRN and its branches were examined in 10 cadavers. Based on the cadaveric study, anti-dromic nerve conduction studies were performed on 31 healthy subjects. Results: The SRN became superficial approximately 8.4 cm from the radial styloid process (RS) and divided into medial and lateral branches 4.9 cm proximal to RS. The medial branch divided into two branches: proximal to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon in 16 hands. The lateral branch ran parallel and 0.2 cm lateral to abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was significantly shorter in latencies when recording over snuff box, compared with that from the EPL and APL tendons. SNAP obtained from APL tendon was significantly smaller in amplitude, compared with those from snuff box and EPL tendon. Conclusions: Anti-dromic stimulation of SRN should be performed 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode. The optimal recording position for each branch of SRN is snuff box for medial branch, and lateral to APL tendon for lateral branch. Significance: The SRN can be evaluated appropriately by NCS of medial and lateral branches of SRN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-232
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume121
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Radial Nerve
Neural Conduction
Cadaver
Tendons
Smokeless Tobacco
Action Potentials
Healthy Volunteers
Electrodes
Hand

Keywords

  • Anatomical study
  • Lateral branch
  • Medial branch
  • Nerve conduction
  • Superficial radial nerve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve : Cadaver and nerve conduction studies. / Park, Byung Kyu; Bun, Hye Ryoung; Hwang, Miriam; Hong, Jonghwa; Kim, Dong Hwee.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 121, No. 2, 01.02.2010, p. 228-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da5842ab722b4445b18a1fc9ee85dbc1,
title = "Medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve: Cadaver and nerve conduction studies",
abstract = "Objective: To establish a reliable technique for nerve conduction study (NCS) of medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). Methods: The distribution of SRN and its branches were examined in 10 cadavers. Based on the cadaveric study, anti-dromic nerve conduction studies were performed on 31 healthy subjects. Results: The SRN became superficial approximately 8.4 cm from the radial styloid process (RS) and divided into medial and lateral branches 4.9 cm proximal to RS. The medial branch divided into two branches: proximal to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon in 16 hands. The lateral branch ran parallel and 0.2 cm lateral to abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was significantly shorter in latencies when recording over snuff box, compared with that from the EPL and APL tendons. SNAP obtained from APL tendon was significantly smaller in amplitude, compared with those from snuff box and EPL tendon. Conclusions: Anti-dromic stimulation of SRN should be performed 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode. The optimal recording position for each branch of SRN is snuff box for medial branch, and lateral to APL tendon for lateral branch. Significance: The SRN can be evaluated appropriately by NCS of medial and lateral branches of SRN.",
keywords = "Anatomical study, Lateral branch, Medial branch, Nerve conduction, Superficial radial nerve",
author = "Park, {Byung Kyu} and Bun, {Hye Ryoung} and Miriam Hwang and Jonghwa Hong and Kim, {Dong Hwee}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "228--232",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve

T2 - Cadaver and nerve conduction studies

AU - Park, Byung Kyu

AU - Bun, Hye Ryoung

AU - Hwang, Miriam

AU - Hong, Jonghwa

AU - Kim, Dong Hwee

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Objective: To establish a reliable technique for nerve conduction study (NCS) of medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). Methods: The distribution of SRN and its branches were examined in 10 cadavers. Based on the cadaveric study, anti-dromic nerve conduction studies were performed on 31 healthy subjects. Results: The SRN became superficial approximately 8.4 cm from the radial styloid process (RS) and divided into medial and lateral branches 4.9 cm proximal to RS. The medial branch divided into two branches: proximal to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon in 16 hands. The lateral branch ran parallel and 0.2 cm lateral to abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was significantly shorter in latencies when recording over snuff box, compared with that from the EPL and APL tendons. SNAP obtained from APL tendon was significantly smaller in amplitude, compared with those from snuff box and EPL tendon. Conclusions: Anti-dromic stimulation of SRN should be performed 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode. The optimal recording position for each branch of SRN is snuff box for medial branch, and lateral to APL tendon for lateral branch. Significance: The SRN can be evaluated appropriately by NCS of medial and lateral branches of SRN.

AB - Objective: To establish a reliable technique for nerve conduction study (NCS) of medial and lateral branches of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). Methods: The distribution of SRN and its branches were examined in 10 cadavers. Based on the cadaveric study, anti-dromic nerve conduction studies were performed on 31 healthy subjects. Results: The SRN became superficial approximately 8.4 cm from the radial styloid process (RS) and divided into medial and lateral branches 4.9 cm proximal to RS. The medial branch divided into two branches: proximal to extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon in 16 hands. The lateral branch ran parallel and 0.2 cm lateral to abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon. Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was significantly shorter in latencies when recording over snuff box, compared with that from the EPL and APL tendons. SNAP obtained from APL tendon was significantly smaller in amplitude, compared with those from snuff box and EPL tendon. Conclusions: Anti-dromic stimulation of SRN should be performed 10 cm proximal to the recording electrode. The optimal recording position for each branch of SRN is snuff box for medial branch, and lateral to APL tendon for lateral branch. Significance: The SRN can be evaluated appropriately by NCS of medial and lateral branches of SRN.

KW - Anatomical study

KW - Lateral branch

KW - Medial branch

KW - Nerve conduction

KW - Superficial radial nerve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149177016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149177016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.011

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 228

EP - 232

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 2

ER -