Mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry

Guk Hee Suh, Changsu Han

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review Economic evaluation is becoming more and more important as a means to assist policy makers in choosing the best intervention or treatment against a pervasive scarcity of resources relative to the demands. Health service provision and the practice of geriatric psychiatry are closely associated with costs and outcomes of health economics. Recently published literature raising unanswered questions in these areas is reviewed. Recent findings Some studies on the costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of certain interventions or treatments (e.g. respite care, home-visiting community service) compared with usual strategies show that these are not optimal in terms of health economics. The updated guidance by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that cholinesterase inhibitors should be used only for moderate severity dementia on the grounds of cost-effectiveness has been heavily criticized. Mental health provision for older people varies across 'developed' and 'developing' countries. Summary Updated findings provide better understanding of recent progress and issues on mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry. The application of health economics to the field of mental health should make complicated issues simple and explicit. Constructive criticisms and scientific debates will hasten the development of better tools or methodologies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current and new interventions or treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)546-550
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Geriatric Psychiatry
Health Services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Mental Health
Economics
Respite Care
Social Welfare
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
Health
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Administrative Personnel
Developed Countries
Health Care Costs
Developing Countries
Dementia
Therapeutics
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Geriatric psychiatry
  • Health economics
  • Mental health
  • Service

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry. / Suh, Guk Hee; Han, Changsu.

In: Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.11.2008, p. 546-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{119205a734a44cc5927c6a301715df23,
title = "Mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry",
abstract = "Purpose of review Economic evaluation is becoming more and more important as a means to assist policy makers in choosing the best intervention or treatment against a pervasive scarcity of resources relative to the demands. Health service provision and the practice of geriatric psychiatry are closely associated with costs and outcomes of health economics. Recently published literature raising unanswered questions in these areas is reviewed. Recent findings Some studies on the costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of certain interventions or treatments (e.g. respite care, home-visiting community service) compared with usual strategies show that these are not optimal in terms of health economics. The updated guidance by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that cholinesterase inhibitors should be used only for moderate severity dementia on the grounds of cost-effectiveness has been heavily criticized. Mental health provision for older people varies across 'developed' and 'developing' countries. Summary Updated findings provide better understanding of recent progress and issues on mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry. The application of health economics to the field of mental health should make complicated issues simple and explicit. Constructive criticisms and scientific debates will hasten the development of better tools or methodologies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current and new interventions or treatments.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Geriatric psychiatry, Health economics, Mental health, Service",
author = "Suh, {Guk Hee} and Changsu Han",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830f1bd5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "546--550",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychiatry",
issn = "0951-7367",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry

AU - Suh, Guk Hee

AU - Han, Changsu

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Purpose of review Economic evaluation is becoming more and more important as a means to assist policy makers in choosing the best intervention or treatment against a pervasive scarcity of resources relative to the demands. Health service provision and the practice of geriatric psychiatry are closely associated with costs and outcomes of health economics. Recently published literature raising unanswered questions in these areas is reviewed. Recent findings Some studies on the costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of certain interventions or treatments (e.g. respite care, home-visiting community service) compared with usual strategies show that these are not optimal in terms of health economics. The updated guidance by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that cholinesterase inhibitors should be used only for moderate severity dementia on the grounds of cost-effectiveness has been heavily criticized. Mental health provision for older people varies across 'developed' and 'developing' countries. Summary Updated findings provide better understanding of recent progress and issues on mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry. The application of health economics to the field of mental health should make complicated issues simple and explicit. Constructive criticisms and scientific debates will hasten the development of better tools or methodologies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current and new interventions or treatments.

AB - Purpose of review Economic evaluation is becoming more and more important as a means to assist policy makers in choosing the best intervention or treatment against a pervasive scarcity of resources relative to the demands. Health service provision and the practice of geriatric psychiatry are closely associated with costs and outcomes of health economics. Recently published literature raising unanswered questions in these areas is reviewed. Recent findings Some studies on the costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of certain interventions or treatments (e.g. respite care, home-visiting community service) compared with usual strategies show that these are not optimal in terms of health economics. The updated guidance by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence that cholinesterase inhibitors should be used only for moderate severity dementia on the grounds of cost-effectiveness has been heavily criticized. Mental health provision for older people varies across 'developed' and 'developing' countries. Summary Updated findings provide better understanding of recent progress and issues on mental health economics, health service provision, and the practice of geriatric psychiatry. The application of health economics to the field of mental health should make complicated issues simple and explicit. Constructive criticisms and scientific debates will hasten the development of better tools or methodologies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current and new interventions or treatments.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Geriatric psychiatry

KW - Health economics

KW - Mental health

KW - Service

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56249108788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56249108788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830f1bd5

DO - 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830f1bd5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18852560

AN - SCOPUS:56249108788

VL - 21

SP - 546

EP - 550

JO - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

JF - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

SN - 0951-7367

IS - 6

ER -