Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions on survival time in patients with cancer

P. J. Oh, S. R. Shin, Hyeong Sik Ahn, H. J. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study was to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival in adult patients with cancer. Method: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Korean electronic databases (September 2014) were searched. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomized studies. The RevMan 5.3 program of the Cochrane library was used for data analysis. Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2940 participants. Overall, psychosocial interventions was not associated with better survival (HR = .83, 95% CI [.68, 1.10], p = .06, I2 = 64%). In subgroup analysis, based on six trials with 1448 subjects, psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients with non-metastatic at intervention implementation resulted in a 41% reduction in the risk of dying of cancer (HR = .59, 95% CI [.49,.71], p < .001, I2 = 0%). For psychoeducational intervention, significant survival benefit were found when health staff delivered the intervention and at a follow-up time of more than 10 years. Conclusions: Use of psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients at early stage appeared to have beneficial effects on survival, preferably for delivering of health staff. However, conduct of further psychosocial studies with adequate power will lead to better understanding of the effects of treatments on survival outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-419
Number of pages24
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Apr 2

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Survival
Neoplasms
Libraries
Health
Risk Reduction Behavior
PubMed
MEDLINE
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • intervention studies
  • meta-analysis
  • neoplasm
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions on survival time in patients with cancer. / Oh, P. J.; Shin, S. R.; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Kim, H. J.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 31, No. 4, 02.04.2016, p. 396-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oh, P. J. ; Shin, S. R. ; Ahn, Hyeong Sik ; Kim, H. J. / Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions on survival time in patients with cancer. In: Psychology and Health. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 396-419.
@article{7793455c35af4fa4b5738ef3fd30fdaa,
title = "Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions on survival time in patients with cancer",
abstract = "Objective: This study was to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival in adult patients with cancer. Method: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Korean electronic databases (September 2014) were searched. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomized studies. The RevMan 5.3 program of the Cochrane library was used for data analysis. Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2940 participants. Overall, psychosocial interventions was not associated with better survival (HR = .83, 95{\%} CI [.68, 1.10], p = .06, I2 = 64{\%}). In subgroup analysis, based on six trials with 1448 subjects, psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients with non-metastatic at intervention implementation resulted in a 41{\%} reduction in the risk of dying of cancer (HR = .59, 95{\%} CI [.49,.71], p < .001, I2 = 0{\%}). For psychoeducational intervention, significant survival benefit were found when health staff delivered the intervention and at a follow-up time of more than 10 years. Conclusions: Use of psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients at early stage appeared to have beneficial effects on survival, preferably for delivering of health staff. However, conduct of further psychosocial studies with adequate power will lead to better understanding of the effects of treatments on survival outcome.",
keywords = "intervention studies, meta-analysis, neoplasm, survival",
author = "Oh, {P. J.} and Shin, {S. R.} and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Kim, {H. J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2015.1111370",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "396--419",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions on survival time in patients with cancer

AU - Oh, P. J.

AU - Shin, S. R.

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Kim, H. J.

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - Objective: This study was to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival in adult patients with cancer. Method: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Korean electronic databases (September 2014) were searched. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomized studies. The RevMan 5.3 program of the Cochrane library was used for data analysis. Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2940 participants. Overall, psychosocial interventions was not associated with better survival (HR = .83, 95% CI [.68, 1.10], p = .06, I2 = 64%). In subgroup analysis, based on six trials with 1448 subjects, psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients with non-metastatic at intervention implementation resulted in a 41% reduction in the risk of dying of cancer (HR = .59, 95% CI [.49,.71], p < .001, I2 = 0%). For psychoeducational intervention, significant survival benefit were found when health staff delivered the intervention and at a follow-up time of more than 10 years. Conclusions: Use of psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients at early stage appeared to have beneficial effects on survival, preferably for delivering of health staff. However, conduct of further psychosocial studies with adequate power will lead to better understanding of the effects of treatments on survival outcome.

AB - Objective: This study was to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival in adult patients with cancer. Method: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Korean electronic databases (September 2014) were searched. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomized studies. The RevMan 5.3 program of the Cochrane library was used for data analysis. Results: Fifteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2940 participants. Overall, psychosocial interventions was not associated with better survival (HR = .83, 95% CI [.68, 1.10], p = .06, I2 = 64%). In subgroup analysis, based on six trials with 1448 subjects, psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients with non-metastatic at intervention implementation resulted in a 41% reduction in the risk of dying of cancer (HR = .59, 95% CI [.49,.71], p < .001, I2 = 0%). For psychoeducational intervention, significant survival benefit were found when health staff delivered the intervention and at a follow-up time of more than 10 years. Conclusions: Use of psychoeducational interventions for cancer patients at early stage appeared to have beneficial effects on survival, preferably for delivering of health staff. However, conduct of further psychosocial studies with adequate power will lead to better understanding of the effects of treatments on survival outcome.

KW - intervention studies

KW - meta-analysis

KW - neoplasm

KW - survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959248846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959248846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1111370

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1111370

M3 - Article

C2 - 26518363

AN - SCOPUS:84959248846

VL - 31

SP - 396

EP - 419

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 4

ER -