Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context

Joan Benach, Antía Castedo, Orielle Solar, José Miguel Martínez, Montserrat Vergara, Marcelo Amable, Maria Buxó, Yucel Demiral, Carles Muntaner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors describe the major methods and sources of information used in the EMCONET study for researching global, employment-related health inequalities. A systematic review of the literature provides valuable knowledge for research in this area. However, the limited number of studies, the poor quality of methods used, and a lack of theories or concepts have produced inconsistent results. To minimize bias from these limitations and to reach a comprehensive understanding of the complexity and health effects of global employment conditions, this article outlines key strategies for a synthetic, comprehensive, participatory approach: adapting transdisciplinary knowledge acquisition, building a theoretical model, employing multiple sources for data collection, and using a variety of methods (qualitative/quantitative studies and narrative knowledge). This approach provides solutions to important research and policy needs regarding the global context of key employment relations, social mechanisms, and health inequalities. The strategies are adapted to synthesize input from several disciplines (epidemiology, sociology, and political science), social actors, and institutions. The study's main sources of information are a variety of digital, bibliographic databases; the authors reviewed the scientific literature from 1985 to 2008 and books, reports, and other documents from 2000 to 2008.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-213
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Health Services
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Health
Bibliographic Databases
Literature
Sociology
Research
Epidemiology
Theoretical Models
Global Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Benach, J., Castedo, A., Solar, O., Martínez, J. M., Vergara, M., Amable, M., ... Muntaner, C. (2010). Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context. International Journal of Health Services, 40(2), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.40.2.b

Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context. / Benach, Joan; Castedo, Antía; Solar, Orielle; Martínez, José Miguel; Vergara, Montserrat; Amable, Marcelo; Buxó, Maria; Demiral, Yucel; Muntaner, Carles.

In: International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.01.2010, p. 209-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benach, J, Castedo, A, Solar, O, Martínez, JM, Vergara, M, Amable, M, Buxó, M, Demiral, Y & Muntaner, C 2010, 'Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context', International Journal of Health Services, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 209-213. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.40.2.b
Benach, Joan ; Castedo, Antía ; Solar, Orielle ; Martínez, José Miguel ; Vergara, Montserrat ; Amable, Marcelo ; Buxó, Maria ; Demiral, Yucel ; Muntaner, Carles. / Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context. In: International Journal of Health Services. 2010 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 209-213.
@article{fd6d7f584b2d4e7b9dfe74acc672dedf,
title = "Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context",
abstract = "The authors describe the major methods and sources of information used in the EMCONET study for researching global, employment-related health inequalities. A systematic review of the literature provides valuable knowledge for research in this area. However, the limited number of studies, the poor quality of methods used, and a lack of theories or concepts have produced inconsistent results. To minimize bias from these limitations and to reach a comprehensive understanding of the complexity and health effects of global employment conditions, this article outlines key strategies for a synthetic, comprehensive, participatory approach: adapting transdisciplinary knowledge acquisition, building a theoretical model, employing multiple sources for data collection, and using a variety of methods (qualitative/quantitative studies and narrative knowledge). This approach provides solutions to important research and policy needs regarding the global context of key employment relations, social mechanisms, and health inequalities. The strategies are adapted to synthesize input from several disciplines (epidemiology, sociology, and political science), social actors, and institutions. The study's main sources of information are a variety of digital, bibliographic databases; the authors reviewed the scientific literature from 1985 to 2008 and books, reports, and other documents from 2000 to 2008.",
author = "Joan Benach and Ant{\'i}a Castedo and Orielle Solar and Mart{\'i}nez, {Jos{\'e} Miguel} and Montserrat Vergara and Marcelo Amable and Maria Bux{\'o} and Yucel Demiral and Carles Muntaner",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2190/HS.40.2.b",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "209--213",
journal = "International Journal of Health Services",
issn = "0020-7314",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods for the study of employment relations and health inequalities in a global context

AU - Benach, Joan

AU - Castedo, Antía

AU - Solar, Orielle

AU - Martínez, José Miguel

AU - Vergara, Montserrat

AU - Amable, Marcelo

AU - Buxó, Maria

AU - Demiral, Yucel

AU - Muntaner, Carles

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The authors describe the major methods and sources of information used in the EMCONET study for researching global, employment-related health inequalities. A systematic review of the literature provides valuable knowledge for research in this area. However, the limited number of studies, the poor quality of methods used, and a lack of theories or concepts have produced inconsistent results. To minimize bias from these limitations and to reach a comprehensive understanding of the complexity and health effects of global employment conditions, this article outlines key strategies for a synthetic, comprehensive, participatory approach: adapting transdisciplinary knowledge acquisition, building a theoretical model, employing multiple sources for data collection, and using a variety of methods (qualitative/quantitative studies and narrative knowledge). This approach provides solutions to important research and policy needs regarding the global context of key employment relations, social mechanisms, and health inequalities. The strategies are adapted to synthesize input from several disciplines (epidemiology, sociology, and political science), social actors, and institutions. The study's main sources of information are a variety of digital, bibliographic databases; the authors reviewed the scientific literature from 1985 to 2008 and books, reports, and other documents from 2000 to 2008.

AB - The authors describe the major methods and sources of information used in the EMCONET study for researching global, employment-related health inequalities. A systematic review of the literature provides valuable knowledge for research in this area. However, the limited number of studies, the poor quality of methods used, and a lack of theories or concepts have produced inconsistent results. To minimize bias from these limitations and to reach a comprehensive understanding of the complexity and health effects of global employment conditions, this article outlines key strategies for a synthetic, comprehensive, participatory approach: adapting transdisciplinary knowledge acquisition, building a theoretical model, employing multiple sources for data collection, and using a variety of methods (qualitative/quantitative studies and narrative knowledge). This approach provides solutions to important research and policy needs regarding the global context of key employment relations, social mechanisms, and health inequalities. The strategies are adapted to synthesize input from several disciplines (epidemiology, sociology, and political science), social actors, and institutions. The study's main sources of information are a variety of digital, bibliographic databases; the authors reviewed the scientific literature from 1985 to 2008 and books, reports, and other documents from 2000 to 2008.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949857418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949857418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/HS.40.2.b

DO - 10.2190/HS.40.2.b

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 209

EP - 213

JO - International Journal of Health Services

JF - International Journal of Health Services

SN - 0020-7314

IS - 2

ER -