Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass

R. Van Poucke, R. W. Nachenius, K. E. Agbo, F. Hensgen, L. Bühle, M. Wachendorf, Yong Sik Ok, F. M.G. Tack, W. Prins, F. Ronsse, E. Meers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish whether hydrothermal conditioning and subsequent thermochemical processing via batch torrefaction or slow pyrolysis may improve the fuel quality of grass residues. A comparison in terms of fuel quality was made of the direct thermochemical processing of the feedstock versus hydrothermal conditioning as a pretreatment prior to thermochemical processing. Hydrothermal conditioning reduced ash content, and particularly nitrogen, potassium and chlorine contents in the biomass. The removal of volatile organic matter associated with thermochemical processes can increase the HHV to levels of volatile bituminous coal. However, slow pyrolysis only increased the HHV of biomass provided a low ash content (<6%) feedstock was used. In conclusion, hydrothermal conditioning can have a highly positive influence on the efficiency of thermochemical processes for upgrading low-value (high-ash) biomass to a higher quality fuel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume217
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ashes
conditioning
pyrolysis
Biomass
Pyrolysis
Feedstocks
ash
biomass
Processing
Coal
Bituminous coal
Chlorine
Biological materials
bituminous coal
Potassium
Nitrogen
chlorine
potassium
grass
organic matter

Keywords

  • Energy densification
  • Grass
  • Hydrothermal conditioning
  • Slow pyrolysis
  • Torrefaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Van Poucke, R., Nachenius, R. W., Agbo, K. E., Hensgen, F., Bühle, L., Wachendorf, M., ... Meers, E. (2016). Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass. Bioresource Technology, 217, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.014

Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass. / Van Poucke, R.; Nachenius, R. W.; Agbo, K. E.; Hensgen, F.; Bühle, L.; Wachendorf, M.; Ok, Yong Sik; Tack, F. M.G.; Prins, W.; Ronsse, F.; Meers, E.

In: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 217, 01.10.2016, p. 104-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Poucke, R, Nachenius, RW, Agbo, KE, Hensgen, F, Bühle, L, Wachendorf, M, Ok, YS, Tack, FMG, Prins, W, Ronsse, F & Meers, E 2016, 'Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass', Bioresource Technology, vol. 217, pp. 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.014
Van Poucke, R. ; Nachenius, R. W. ; Agbo, K. E. ; Hensgen, F. ; Bühle, L. ; Wachendorf, M. ; Ok, Yong Sik ; Tack, F. M.G. ; Prins, W. ; Ronsse, F. ; Meers, E. / Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass. In: Bioresource Technology. 2016 ; Vol. 217. pp. 104-112.
@article{462b10b4eca4470aa252b5b8f2a87a62,
title = "Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass",
abstract = "The aim of this research was to establish whether hydrothermal conditioning and subsequent thermochemical processing via batch torrefaction or slow pyrolysis may improve the fuel quality of grass residues. A comparison in terms of fuel quality was made of the direct thermochemical processing of the feedstock versus hydrothermal conditioning as a pretreatment prior to thermochemical processing. Hydrothermal conditioning reduced ash content, and particularly nitrogen, potassium and chlorine contents in the biomass. The removal of volatile organic matter associated with thermochemical processes can increase the HHV to levels of volatile bituminous coal. However, slow pyrolysis only increased the HHV of biomass provided a low ash content (<6{\%}) feedstock was used. In conclusion, hydrothermal conditioning can have a highly positive influence on the efficiency of thermochemical processes for upgrading low-value (high-ash) biomass to a higher quality fuel.",
keywords = "Energy densification, Grass, Hydrothermal conditioning, Slow pyrolysis, Torrefaction",
author = "{Van Poucke}, R. and Nachenius, {R. W.} and Agbo, {K. E.} and F. Hensgen and L. B{\"u}hle and M. Wachendorf and Ok, {Yong Sik} and Tack, {F. M.G.} and W. Prins and F. Ronsse and E. Meers",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.014",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "104--112",
journal = "Bioresource Technology",
issn = "0960-8524",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mild hydrothermal conditioning prior to torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of low-value biomass

AU - Van Poucke, R.

AU - Nachenius, R. W.

AU - Agbo, K. E.

AU - Hensgen, F.

AU - Bühle, L.

AU - Wachendorf, M.

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

AU - Tack, F. M.G.

AU - Prins, W.

AU - Ronsse, F.

AU - Meers, E.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The aim of this research was to establish whether hydrothermal conditioning and subsequent thermochemical processing via batch torrefaction or slow pyrolysis may improve the fuel quality of grass residues. A comparison in terms of fuel quality was made of the direct thermochemical processing of the feedstock versus hydrothermal conditioning as a pretreatment prior to thermochemical processing. Hydrothermal conditioning reduced ash content, and particularly nitrogen, potassium and chlorine contents in the biomass. The removal of volatile organic matter associated with thermochemical processes can increase the HHV to levels of volatile bituminous coal. However, slow pyrolysis only increased the HHV of biomass provided a low ash content (<6%) feedstock was used. In conclusion, hydrothermal conditioning can have a highly positive influence on the efficiency of thermochemical processes for upgrading low-value (high-ash) biomass to a higher quality fuel.

AB - The aim of this research was to establish whether hydrothermal conditioning and subsequent thermochemical processing via batch torrefaction or slow pyrolysis may improve the fuel quality of grass residues. A comparison in terms of fuel quality was made of the direct thermochemical processing of the feedstock versus hydrothermal conditioning as a pretreatment prior to thermochemical processing. Hydrothermal conditioning reduced ash content, and particularly nitrogen, potassium and chlorine contents in the biomass. The removal of volatile organic matter associated with thermochemical processes can increase the HHV to levels of volatile bituminous coal. However, slow pyrolysis only increased the HHV of biomass provided a low ash content (<6%) feedstock was used. In conclusion, hydrothermal conditioning can have a highly positive influence on the efficiency of thermochemical processes for upgrading low-value (high-ash) biomass to a higher quality fuel.

KW - Energy densification

KW - Grass

KW - Hydrothermal conditioning

KW - Slow pyrolysis

KW - Torrefaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960172273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960172273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 26976062

AN - SCOPUS:84960172273

VL - 217

SP - 104

EP - 112

JO - Bioresource Technology

JF - Bioresource Technology

SN - 0960-8524

ER -