Improved evaluation of anthropogenic contamination is required to sustainably manage groundwater resources. In this study, we investigated the hydrochemical measurements of 18 parameters from a total of 102 bedrock groundwater samples from two representative rural areas in South Korea. We used model-based clustering with a normal (Gaussian) mixture model to differentiate the contributions of natural versus anthropogenic processes to the observed groundwater quality. Water samples varied in hydrochemistry from a Ca-Na-HCO3 type to a Ca-HCO3-Cl type. The former type reflected derivation of major ions largely from water-rock interactions, while the latter type recorded varying degrees of anthropogenic contamination. Among the major dissolved ions, fluoride and nitrate were shown to be good indicators of the two types, respectively. The results of model-based clustering showed that the bivariate normal mixture model, which was based on the covariance of nitrate and fluoride, was more robust than multivariate analysis, and provided better discrimination between the anthropogenic and natural groundwater groups. Model-based clustering to measure the degree of cluster membership for each sample also showed a gradual change in groundwater chemistry due to mixing between the two water groups. This study provided an example of the successful application of model-based clustering to evaluate regional groundwater quality and demonstrated that better selection of the dimensional structure (i.e., selection of optimal variables and number of clusters) based on hydrochemistry was crucial in obtaining reasonable clustering results.
- Bedrock groundwater quality
- Model-based clustering
- Natural versus anthropogenic processes
- Normal (Gaussian) mixture model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Water Science and Technology