Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system

Jin Sung Kim, Myonggeun Yoon, Sunghwan Ahn, Dong Ho Shin, Young Kyung Lim, Sung Yong Park, Se Byeong Lee, Kwan Ho Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the modeling of a proton treatment couch for a commercial proton treatment planning system, a real couch was scanned using a CT scanner and was inserted into the commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS, Eclipse, v8.12) by replacing the CT couch of all transverse CT slices. The couch inserted in the proton TPS was validated by dosimetric measurements of percentage depth dose (PDD), transverse profile, and output. When the beam direction was perpendicular to the proton couch (0° in our configuration), insertion of the proton couch shortened the range of the proton beam by 0.99 ± 0.01 cm and caused the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) to vary by 0.10 ± 0.09 cm. Increasing the angle of the beam from 0° to 55° increased the average range shift of the proton beam from 0.99 cm to 1.70 cm, but had little effect on the SOBP, which varied by less than 0.1 cm. Insertion of the proton couch had no effect on the transverse dose profiles at various depths. When we measured the doses at points set at various depths, located in the middle of the SOBP for various beam energies, with/without proton couch, we found no distinct changes in output with insertion of the couch, resulting in a variation of less than 1%. These results suggest that dosimetric factors, such as range, profile, and output factors, were little changed by insertion of a proton couch whereas the beam range depended greatly on both couch insertion and beam angle. Using the inserted CT scanned proton couch in the TPS, we found that the range of the proton beam was shortened by ∼0.7 cm in the TPS, a ∼0.3 cm difference from the actual measurement. The difference between the computed and the measured ranges was compensated by assigning appropriate densities to the inserted proton couch, called a digital couch. Measured and computed percent depth dose (PDD) with the digital couch showed that the beam range and the SOBP were well matched for various beam angles, with differences of 0.01 ± 0.02 cm and 0.12 ± 0.03 cm, respectively. Our results suggest that a digital couch with relevant density assignment may be a good solution for proton couch modeling, which can be used for a commercial proton TPSs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1640-1648
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Korean Physical Society
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Oct 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

couches
planning
protons
insertion
proton beams
dosage
output
profiles

Keywords

  • Couch
  • Proton therapy
  • Range
  • Spread-out Bragg peak
  • Treatment planning system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Kim, J. S., Yoon, M., Ahn, S., Shin, D. H., Lim, Y. K., Park, S. Y., ... Cho, K. H. (2009). Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 55(4), 1640-1648. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.55.1640

Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system. / Kim, Jin Sung; Yoon, Myonggeun; Ahn, Sunghwan; Shin, Dong Ho; Lim, Young Kyung; Park, Sung Yong; Lee, Se Byeong; Cho, Kwan Ho.

In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.10.2009, p. 1640-1648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, JS, Yoon, M, Ahn, S, Shin, DH, Lim, YK, Park, SY, Lee, SB & Cho, KH 2009, 'Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system', Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1640-1648. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.55.1640
Kim, Jin Sung ; Yoon, Myonggeun ; Ahn, Sunghwan ; Shin, Dong Ho ; Lim, Young Kyung ; Park, Sung Yong ; Lee, Se Byeong ; Cho, Kwan Ho. / Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system. In: Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 2009 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 1640-1648.
@article{48a5a0e55a694cb497df007215aa8ef6,
title = "Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system",
abstract = "To evaluate the modeling of a proton treatment couch for a commercial proton treatment planning system, a real couch was scanned using a CT scanner and was inserted into the commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS, Eclipse, v8.12) by replacing the CT couch of all transverse CT slices. The couch inserted in the proton TPS was validated by dosimetric measurements of percentage depth dose (PDD), transverse profile, and output. When the beam direction was perpendicular to the proton couch (0° in our configuration), insertion of the proton couch shortened the range of the proton beam by 0.99 ± 0.01 cm and caused the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) to vary by 0.10 ± 0.09 cm. Increasing the angle of the beam from 0° to 55° increased the average range shift of the proton beam from 0.99 cm to 1.70 cm, but had little effect on the SOBP, which varied by less than 0.1 cm. Insertion of the proton couch had no effect on the transverse dose profiles at various depths. When we measured the doses at points set at various depths, located in the middle of the SOBP for various beam energies, with/without proton couch, we found no distinct changes in output with insertion of the couch, resulting in a variation of less than 1{\%}. These results suggest that dosimetric factors, such as range, profile, and output factors, were little changed by insertion of a proton couch whereas the beam range depended greatly on both couch insertion and beam angle. Using the inserted CT scanned proton couch in the TPS, we found that the range of the proton beam was shortened by ∼0.7 cm in the TPS, a ∼0.3 cm difference from the actual measurement. The difference between the computed and the measured ranges was compensated by assigning appropriate densities to the inserted proton couch, called a digital couch. Measured and computed percent depth dose (PDD) with the digital couch showed that the beam range and the SOBP were well matched for various beam angles, with differences of 0.01 ± 0.02 cm and 0.12 ± 0.03 cm, respectively. Our results suggest that a digital couch with relevant density assignment may be a good solution for proton couch modeling, which can be used for a commercial proton TPSs.",
keywords = "Couch, Proton therapy, Range, Spread-out Bragg peak, Treatment planning system",
author = "Kim, {Jin Sung} and Myonggeun Yoon and Sunghwan Ahn and Shin, {Dong Ho} and Lim, {Young Kyung} and Park, {Sung Yong} and Lee, {Se Byeong} and Cho, {Kwan Ho}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3938/jkps.55.1640",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1640--1648",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Physical Society",
issn = "0374-4884",
publisher = "Korean Physical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling of a digital couch for a proton treatment planning system

AU - Kim, Jin Sung

AU - Yoon, Myonggeun

AU - Ahn, Sunghwan

AU - Shin, Dong Ho

AU - Lim, Young Kyung

AU - Park, Sung Yong

AU - Lee, Se Byeong

AU - Cho, Kwan Ho

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - To evaluate the modeling of a proton treatment couch for a commercial proton treatment planning system, a real couch was scanned using a CT scanner and was inserted into the commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS, Eclipse, v8.12) by replacing the CT couch of all transverse CT slices. The couch inserted in the proton TPS was validated by dosimetric measurements of percentage depth dose (PDD), transverse profile, and output. When the beam direction was perpendicular to the proton couch (0° in our configuration), insertion of the proton couch shortened the range of the proton beam by 0.99 ± 0.01 cm and caused the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) to vary by 0.10 ± 0.09 cm. Increasing the angle of the beam from 0° to 55° increased the average range shift of the proton beam from 0.99 cm to 1.70 cm, but had little effect on the SOBP, which varied by less than 0.1 cm. Insertion of the proton couch had no effect on the transverse dose profiles at various depths. When we measured the doses at points set at various depths, located in the middle of the SOBP for various beam energies, with/without proton couch, we found no distinct changes in output with insertion of the couch, resulting in a variation of less than 1%. These results suggest that dosimetric factors, such as range, profile, and output factors, were little changed by insertion of a proton couch whereas the beam range depended greatly on both couch insertion and beam angle. Using the inserted CT scanned proton couch in the TPS, we found that the range of the proton beam was shortened by ∼0.7 cm in the TPS, a ∼0.3 cm difference from the actual measurement. The difference between the computed and the measured ranges was compensated by assigning appropriate densities to the inserted proton couch, called a digital couch. Measured and computed percent depth dose (PDD) with the digital couch showed that the beam range and the SOBP were well matched for various beam angles, with differences of 0.01 ± 0.02 cm and 0.12 ± 0.03 cm, respectively. Our results suggest that a digital couch with relevant density assignment may be a good solution for proton couch modeling, which can be used for a commercial proton TPSs.

AB - To evaluate the modeling of a proton treatment couch for a commercial proton treatment planning system, a real couch was scanned using a CT scanner and was inserted into the commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS, Eclipse, v8.12) by replacing the CT couch of all transverse CT slices. The couch inserted in the proton TPS was validated by dosimetric measurements of percentage depth dose (PDD), transverse profile, and output. When the beam direction was perpendicular to the proton couch (0° in our configuration), insertion of the proton couch shortened the range of the proton beam by 0.99 ± 0.01 cm and caused the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) to vary by 0.10 ± 0.09 cm. Increasing the angle of the beam from 0° to 55° increased the average range shift of the proton beam from 0.99 cm to 1.70 cm, but had little effect on the SOBP, which varied by less than 0.1 cm. Insertion of the proton couch had no effect on the transverse dose profiles at various depths. When we measured the doses at points set at various depths, located in the middle of the SOBP for various beam energies, with/without proton couch, we found no distinct changes in output with insertion of the couch, resulting in a variation of less than 1%. These results suggest that dosimetric factors, such as range, profile, and output factors, were little changed by insertion of a proton couch whereas the beam range depended greatly on both couch insertion and beam angle. Using the inserted CT scanned proton couch in the TPS, we found that the range of the proton beam was shortened by ∼0.7 cm in the TPS, a ∼0.3 cm difference from the actual measurement. The difference between the computed and the measured ranges was compensated by assigning appropriate densities to the inserted proton couch, called a digital couch. Measured and computed percent depth dose (PDD) with the digital couch showed that the beam range and the SOBP were well matched for various beam angles, with differences of 0.01 ± 0.02 cm and 0.12 ± 0.03 cm, respectively. Our results suggest that a digital couch with relevant density assignment may be a good solution for proton couch modeling, which can be used for a commercial proton TPSs.

KW - Couch

KW - Proton therapy

KW - Range

KW - Spread-out Bragg peak

KW - Treatment planning system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149094873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72149094873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3938/jkps.55.1640

DO - 10.3938/jkps.55.1640

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:72149094873

VL - 55

SP - 1640

EP - 1648

JO - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

JF - Journal of the Korean Physical Society

SN - 0374-4884

IS - 4

ER -