TY - JOUR
T1 - Modular laser-based endoluminal ablation of the gastrointestinal tract
T2 - in vivo dose–effect evaluation and predictive numerical model
AU - Quero, Giuseppe
AU - Saccomandi, Paola
AU - Kwak, Jung Myun
AU - Dallemagne, Bernard
AU - Costamagna, Guido
AU - Marescaux, Jacques
AU - Mutter, Didier
AU - Diana, Michele
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures Michele Diana is the recipient of a grant from the ARC Foundation. Jacques Marescaux is the President of IRCAD and IHU-Strasbourg institutes, which are partly funded by Karl Storz, Siemens Healthcare, and Medtronic. Drs. Giuseppe Quero, Paola Saccomandi, Jung-Myun Kwak, Bernard Dallemagne, Guido Costamagna, Didier Mutter, have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/10/15
Y1 - 2019/10/15
N2 - Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows for “en bloc” removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, it is technically demanding and time-consuming. Alternatives could rely on energy-based techniques. We aimed to evaluate a predictive numerical model of thermal damage to preoperatively define optimal laser settings allowing for a controlled ablation down to the submucosa, and the ability of confocal endomicroscopy to provide damage information. Materials and methods: A Nd:YAG laser was applied onto the gastric mucosa of 21 Wistar rats on 10 spots (total 210). Power settings ranging from 0.5 to 2.5W were applied during 1–12 s, with a consequent energy delivery varying from 0.5 to 30 J. Out of the 210 samples, a total of 1050 hematoxilin–eosin stained slides were obtained. To evaluate thermal injury, the ratio between the damage depth (DD) over the mucosa and the submucosa thickness (T) was calculated. Effective and safe ablation was considered for a DD/T ratio ≤ 1 (only mucosal and submucosal damage). Confocal endomicroscopy was performed before and after ablation. A numerical model, using human physical properties, was developed to predict thermal damage. Results: No full-thickness perforations were detected. On histology, the DD/T ratio at 0.5 J was 0.57 ± 0.21, significantly lower when compared to energies ranging from 15 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.2 ± 0.3; p < 0.001) until 30 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.33 ± 0.31; p < 0.001). Safe mucosal and submucosal ablations were achieved applying energy between 4 and 12 J, never impairing the muscularis propria. Confocal endomicroscopy showed a distorted gland architecture. The predicted damage depth demonstrated a significant positive linear correlation with the experimental data (Pearson’s r 0.85; 95% CI 0.66–0.94). Conclusions: Low-power settings achieved effective and safe mucosal and submucosal ablation. The numerical model allowed for an accurate prediction of the ablated layers. Confocal endomicroscopy provided real-time thermal damage visualization. Further studies on larger animal models are required.
AB - Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection allows for “en bloc” removal of early gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, it is technically demanding and time-consuming. Alternatives could rely on energy-based techniques. We aimed to evaluate a predictive numerical model of thermal damage to preoperatively define optimal laser settings allowing for a controlled ablation down to the submucosa, and the ability of confocal endomicroscopy to provide damage information. Materials and methods: A Nd:YAG laser was applied onto the gastric mucosa of 21 Wistar rats on 10 spots (total 210). Power settings ranging from 0.5 to 2.5W were applied during 1–12 s, with a consequent energy delivery varying from 0.5 to 30 J. Out of the 210 samples, a total of 1050 hematoxilin–eosin stained slides were obtained. To evaluate thermal injury, the ratio between the damage depth (DD) over the mucosa and the submucosa thickness (T) was calculated. Effective and safe ablation was considered for a DD/T ratio ≤ 1 (only mucosal and submucosal damage). Confocal endomicroscopy was performed before and after ablation. A numerical model, using human physical properties, was developed to predict thermal damage. Results: No full-thickness perforations were detected. On histology, the DD/T ratio at 0.5 J was 0.57 ± 0.21, significantly lower when compared to energies ranging from 15 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.2 ± 0.3; p < 0.001) until 30 J (a DD/T ratio = 1.33 ± 0.31; p < 0.001). Safe mucosal and submucosal ablations were achieved applying energy between 4 and 12 J, never impairing the muscularis propria. Confocal endomicroscopy showed a distorted gland architecture. The predicted damage depth demonstrated a significant positive linear correlation with the experimental data (Pearson’s r 0.85; 95% CI 0.66–0.94). Conclusions: Low-power settings achieved effective and safe mucosal and submucosal ablation. The numerical model allowed for an accurate prediction of the ablated layers. Confocal endomicroscopy provided real-time thermal damage visualization. Further studies on larger animal models are required.
KW - Confocal endomicroscopy
KW - Early gastrointestinal cancer
KW - Laser ablation
KW - Preclinical study
KW - Predictive numerical model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056846197&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-018-6603-4
DO - 10.1007/s00464-018-6603-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 30456508
AN - SCOPUS:85056846197
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 33
SP - 3200
EP - 3208
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 10
ER -