Money, unit of account, and nominal rigidity

Young Sik Kim, Manjong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In order to characterize the properties required to fulfill the roles of money as a unit of account (UoA) as well as a medium of exchange (MoE), we consider the choice of a UoA in the context of a micro-founded model where inflation uncertainty exists and some conversion cost is incurred in using a UoA that is different from an MoE. We show that it is not the level of inflation but its volatility that matters for the choice of a UoA. In the presence of inflation uncertainty, money can still become both an MoE and a UoA as long as the conversion cost is higher than its maximum buyers are willing to bear for ensuring stable consumption against inflation uncertainty. Also, the choice of a UoA in the presence of fiat money as an MoE determines endogenously the nominal price rigidity or flexibility. An economy adopting money as a UoA yields the short-run nominal rigidity and the Phillips-curve relationship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-63
Number of pages5
JournalEconomics Letters
Volume160
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Medium of exchange
Nominal rigidities
Inflation uncertainty
Costs
Phillips curve
Buyers
Inflation
Fiat money
Short-run
Price flexibility
Price rigidity

Keywords

  • Inflation uncertainty
  • Medium of exchange
  • Rigidity
  • Unit of account

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Money, unit of account, and nominal rigidity. / Kim, Young Sik; Lee, Manjong.

In: Economics Letters, Vol. 160, 01.11.2017, p. 59-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Young Sik ; Lee, Manjong. / Money, unit of account, and nominal rigidity. In: Economics Letters. 2017 ; Vol. 160. pp. 59-63.
@article{eea6933b676f46bb9505ffe69298da82,
title = "Money, unit of account, and nominal rigidity",
abstract = "In order to characterize the properties required to fulfill the roles of money as a unit of account (UoA) as well as a medium of exchange (MoE), we consider the choice of a UoA in the context of a micro-founded model where inflation uncertainty exists and some conversion cost is incurred in using a UoA that is different from an MoE. We show that it is not the level of inflation but its volatility that matters for the choice of a UoA. In the presence of inflation uncertainty, money can still become both an MoE and a UoA as long as the conversion cost is higher than its maximum buyers are willing to bear for ensuring stable consumption against inflation uncertainty. Also, the choice of a UoA in the presence of fiat money as an MoE determines endogenously the nominal price rigidity or flexibility. An economy adopting money as a UoA yields the short-run nominal rigidity and the Phillips-curve relationship.",
keywords = "Inflation uncertainty, Medium of exchange, Rigidity, Unit of account",
author = "Kim, {Young Sik} and Manjong Lee",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.008",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "59--63",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Money, unit of account, and nominal rigidity

AU - Kim, Young Sik

AU - Lee, Manjong

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - In order to characterize the properties required to fulfill the roles of money as a unit of account (UoA) as well as a medium of exchange (MoE), we consider the choice of a UoA in the context of a micro-founded model where inflation uncertainty exists and some conversion cost is incurred in using a UoA that is different from an MoE. We show that it is not the level of inflation but its volatility that matters for the choice of a UoA. In the presence of inflation uncertainty, money can still become both an MoE and a UoA as long as the conversion cost is higher than its maximum buyers are willing to bear for ensuring stable consumption against inflation uncertainty. Also, the choice of a UoA in the presence of fiat money as an MoE determines endogenously the nominal price rigidity or flexibility. An economy adopting money as a UoA yields the short-run nominal rigidity and the Phillips-curve relationship.

AB - In order to characterize the properties required to fulfill the roles of money as a unit of account (UoA) as well as a medium of exchange (MoE), we consider the choice of a UoA in the context of a micro-founded model where inflation uncertainty exists and some conversion cost is incurred in using a UoA that is different from an MoE. We show that it is not the level of inflation but its volatility that matters for the choice of a UoA. In the presence of inflation uncertainty, money can still become both an MoE and a UoA as long as the conversion cost is higher than its maximum buyers are willing to bear for ensuring stable consumption against inflation uncertainty. Also, the choice of a UoA in the presence of fiat money as an MoE determines endogenously the nominal price rigidity or flexibility. An economy adopting money as a UoA yields the short-run nominal rigidity and the Phillips-curve relationship.

KW - Inflation uncertainty

KW - Medium of exchange

KW - Rigidity

KW - Unit of account

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032901667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032901667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032901667

VL - 160

SP - 59

EP - 63

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

ER -