Motivations for bilateral aid allocation in Korea: Humanitarian, commercial, or diplomatic?

Bokyeong Park, Hongshik Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates Korea's motivations for foreign aid allocation, analyzing panel data from over 180 countries for the last 20 years. The results show that Korea's aid allocation reflects both recipient needs and Korea's own national interests but does not consistently consider aid effectiveness. Korean aid is also characterized by its use as an instrument of both summit diplomacy and resource security. In addition, its commercial motivations appear to have shifted over time, from export promotion to overseas investment support. Despite internal and external pressures, there is no obvious evidence that Korea's allocation rule converges with international guidelines that recommend greater consideration of recipient needs and aid effectiveness and less consideration of donor interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-197
Number of pages18
JournalAsian Economic Papers
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 16

Fingerprint

Korea
recipient
export promotion
diplomacy
overseas
Aid allocation
Bilateral aid
resources
evidence
Aid effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Motivations for bilateral aid allocation in Korea : Humanitarian, commercial, or diplomatic? / Park, Bokyeong; Lee, Hongshik.

In: Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 14, No. 1, 16.01.2015, p. 180-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51d09d33ab20401ba41d1d20faa2e41e,
title = "Motivations for bilateral aid allocation in Korea: Humanitarian, commercial, or diplomatic?",
abstract = "This study investigates Korea's motivations for foreign aid allocation, analyzing panel data from over 180 countries for the last 20 years. The results show that Korea's aid allocation reflects both recipient needs and Korea's own national interests but does not consistently consider aid effectiveness. Korean aid is also characterized by its use as an instrument of both summit diplomacy and resource security. In addition, its commercial motivations appear to have shifted over time, from export promotion to overseas investment support. Despite internal and external pressures, there is no obvious evidence that Korea's allocation rule converges with international guidelines that recommend greater consideration of recipient needs and aid effectiveness and less consideration of donor interests.",
author = "Bokyeong Park and Hongshik Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1162/ASEP-a-00335",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "180--197",
journal = "Asian Economic Papers",
issn = "1535-3516",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivations for bilateral aid allocation in Korea

T2 - Humanitarian, commercial, or diplomatic?

AU - Park, Bokyeong

AU - Lee, Hongshik

PY - 2015/1/16

Y1 - 2015/1/16

N2 - This study investigates Korea's motivations for foreign aid allocation, analyzing panel data from over 180 countries for the last 20 years. The results show that Korea's aid allocation reflects both recipient needs and Korea's own national interests but does not consistently consider aid effectiveness. Korean aid is also characterized by its use as an instrument of both summit diplomacy and resource security. In addition, its commercial motivations appear to have shifted over time, from export promotion to overseas investment support. Despite internal and external pressures, there is no obvious evidence that Korea's allocation rule converges with international guidelines that recommend greater consideration of recipient needs and aid effectiveness and less consideration of donor interests.

AB - This study investigates Korea's motivations for foreign aid allocation, analyzing panel data from over 180 countries for the last 20 years. The results show that Korea's aid allocation reflects both recipient needs and Korea's own national interests but does not consistently consider aid effectiveness. Korean aid is also characterized by its use as an instrument of both summit diplomacy and resource security. In addition, its commercial motivations appear to have shifted over time, from export promotion to overseas investment support. Despite internal and external pressures, there is no obvious evidence that Korea's allocation rule converges with international guidelines that recommend greater consideration of recipient needs and aid effectiveness and less consideration of donor interests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924801678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924801678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/ASEP-a-00335

DO - 10.1162/ASEP-a-00335

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924801678

VL - 14

SP - 180

EP - 197

JO - Asian Economic Papers

JF - Asian Economic Papers

SN - 1535-3516

IS - 1

ER -