Multi-criteria preference analysis for systematic requirements negotiation

Hoh Peter In, David Olson, Tom Rodgers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. This paper proposes a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders during requirements analysis using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques. The eight-step MPARN model is applied to requirements gathered for an industrial-academic repository system. An initial analysis demonstrates that multi-criteria preference analysis methodology with the WinWin model potentially increases stakeholders' levels of cooperation and trust by providing a systematic approach to the design of a better negotiation process, as well as focusing on unbiased aspects within a requirements negotiation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - IEEE Computer Society's International Computer Software and Applications Conference
Pages887-892
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes
Event26th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference - Oxford, United Kingdom
Duration: 2002 Aug 262002 Aug 29

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE Computer Society's International Computer Software and Applications Conference
ISSN (Print)0730-3157

Other

Other26th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityOxford
Period02/8/2602/8/29

Keywords

  • Conflict resolution
  • Multi-criteria preference analysis
  • Requirements negotiation
  • WinWin negotiation model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this