Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of sandwich structures

An evaluation by elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy

A. B. Ilyani Akmar, O. Kramer, Timon Rabczuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, an application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms on the optimization of sandwich structures is presented. The solution strategy is known as Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Evolution Strategy (ENSES) wherein Evolution Strategies (ES) as Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) in the elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) procedure. Evolutionary algorithm seems a compatible approach to resolve multi-objective optimization problems because it is inspired by natural evolution, which closely linked to Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques and elitism has shown an important factor for improving evolutionary multi-objective search. In order to evaluate the notion of performance by ENSES, the well-known study case of sandwich structures are reconsidered. For Case 1, the goals of the multi-objective optimization are minimization of the deflection and the weight of the sandwich structures. The length, the core and skin thicknesses are the design variables of Case 1. For Case 2, the objective functions are the fabrication cost, the beam weight and the end deflection of the sandwich structures. There are four design variables i.e., the weld height, the weld length, the beam depth and the beam width in Case 2. Numerical results are presented in terms of Paretooptimal solutions for both evaluated cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-201
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Apr 22
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sandwich structures
Sorting
sorting
Multiobjective optimization
deflection
Evolutionary algorithms
Welds
study application
artificial intelligence
genetic algorithm
Artificial intelligence
skin
Skin
Genetic algorithms
Fabrication
evaluation
cost
Costs

Keywords

  • Elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy (ENSES)
  • Evolutionary algorithm
  • Multi-objective evolutionary optimization
  • Pareto-optimal solutions
  • Sandwich structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Computer Science(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Environmental Engineering

Cite this

Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of sandwich structures : An evaluation by elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy. / Ilyani Akmar, A. B.; Kramer, O.; Rabczuk, Timon.

In: American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 1, 22.04.2015, p. 185-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e58d54499434999a0570e21964e1d43,
title = "Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of sandwich structures: An evaluation by elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy",
abstract = "In this study, an application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms on the optimization of sandwich structures is presented. The solution strategy is known as Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Evolution Strategy (ENSES) wherein Evolution Strategies (ES) as Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) in the elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) procedure. Evolutionary algorithm seems a compatible approach to resolve multi-objective optimization problems because it is inspired by natural evolution, which closely linked to Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques and elitism has shown an important factor for improving evolutionary multi-objective search. In order to evaluate the notion of performance by ENSES, the well-known study case of sandwich structures are reconsidered. For Case 1, the goals of the multi-objective optimization are minimization of the deflection and the weight of the sandwich structures. The length, the core and skin thicknesses are the design variables of Case 1. For Case 2, the objective functions are the fabrication cost, the beam weight and the end deflection of the sandwich structures. There are four design variables i.e., the weld height, the weld length, the beam depth and the beam width in Case 2. Numerical results are presented in terms of Paretooptimal solutions for both evaluated cases.",
keywords = "Elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy (ENSES), Evolutionary algorithm, Multi-objective evolutionary optimization, Pareto-optimal solutions, Sandwich structure",
author = "{Ilyani Akmar}, {A. B.} and O. Kramer and Timon Rabczuk",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3844/ajeassp.2015.185.201",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "185--201",
journal = "American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences",
issn = "1941-7020",
publisher = "Neuroscience Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of sandwich structures

T2 - An evaluation by elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy

AU - Ilyani Akmar, A. B.

AU - Kramer, O.

AU - Rabczuk, Timon

PY - 2015/4/22

Y1 - 2015/4/22

N2 - In this study, an application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms on the optimization of sandwich structures is presented. The solution strategy is known as Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Evolution Strategy (ENSES) wherein Evolution Strategies (ES) as Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) in the elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) procedure. Evolutionary algorithm seems a compatible approach to resolve multi-objective optimization problems because it is inspired by natural evolution, which closely linked to Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques and elitism has shown an important factor for improving evolutionary multi-objective search. In order to evaluate the notion of performance by ENSES, the well-known study case of sandwich structures are reconsidered. For Case 1, the goals of the multi-objective optimization are minimization of the deflection and the weight of the sandwich structures. The length, the core and skin thicknesses are the design variables of Case 1. For Case 2, the objective functions are the fabrication cost, the beam weight and the end deflection of the sandwich structures. There are four design variables i.e., the weld height, the weld length, the beam depth and the beam width in Case 2. Numerical results are presented in terms of Paretooptimal solutions for both evaluated cases.

AB - In this study, an application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms on the optimization of sandwich structures is presented. The solution strategy is known as Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Evolution Strategy (ENSES) wherein Evolution Strategies (ES) as Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) in the elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) procedure. Evolutionary algorithm seems a compatible approach to resolve multi-objective optimization problems because it is inspired by natural evolution, which closely linked to Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques and elitism has shown an important factor for improving evolutionary multi-objective search. In order to evaluate the notion of performance by ENSES, the well-known study case of sandwich structures are reconsidered. For Case 1, the goals of the multi-objective optimization are minimization of the deflection and the weight of the sandwich structures. The length, the core and skin thicknesses are the design variables of Case 1. For Case 2, the objective functions are the fabrication cost, the beam weight and the end deflection of the sandwich structures. There are four design variables i.e., the weld height, the weld length, the beam depth and the beam width in Case 2. Numerical results are presented in terms of Paretooptimal solutions for both evaluated cases.

KW - Elitist non-dominated sorting evolution strategy (ENSES)

KW - Evolutionary algorithm

KW - Multi-objective evolutionary optimization

KW - Pareto-optimal solutions

KW - Sandwich structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954326498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954326498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3844/ajeassp.2015.185.201

DO - 10.3844/ajeassp.2015.185.201

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 185

EP - 201

JO - American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

JF - American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

SN - 1941-7020

IS - 1

ER -