Multiple criteria decision-making for the resolution of conflicting ergonomic knowledge in manual materials handling

Eui Seung Jung, A. Freivalds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ergonomic design of manual materials handling tasks typically utilizes one or more of three approaches: biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical. Unfortunately, a comprehensive design is rarely obtained because of the difficulty of resolving the conflicting guidelines and criteria for each of the three approaches. This paper describes a methodology utilizing the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) process for resolving this conflict. This approach calculates the ratio of the contribution from each type of stress to an overall stress level as determined by the unacceptability of this stress to the user. An example is presented to demonstrate this technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1351-1356
Number of pages6
JournalErgonomics
Volume34
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1991 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

decision making criterion
Human Engineering
Materials handling
Ergonomics
ergonomics
Decision Making
Decision making
Guidelines
decision-making process
methodology
Handling (Psychology)
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Multiple criteria decision-making for the resolution of conflicting ergonomic knowledge in manual materials handling. / Jung, Eui Seung; Freivalds, A.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 34, No. 11, 01.11.1991, p. 1351-1356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c752313e237240cf80c4b6509896fc09,
title = "Multiple criteria decision-making for the resolution of conflicting ergonomic knowledge in manual materials handling",
abstract = "The ergonomic design of manual materials handling tasks typically utilizes one or more of three approaches: biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical. Unfortunately, a comprehensive design is rarely obtained because of the difficulty of resolving the conflicting guidelines and criteria for each of the three approaches. This paper describes a methodology utilizing the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) process for resolving this conflict. This approach calculates the ratio of the contribution from each type of stress to an overall stress level as determined by the unacceptability of this stress to the user. An example is presented to demonstrate this technique.",
author = "Jung, {Eui Seung} and A. Freivalds",
year = "1991",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1351--1356",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple criteria decision-making for the resolution of conflicting ergonomic knowledge in manual materials handling

AU - Jung, Eui Seung

AU - Freivalds, A.

PY - 1991/11/1

Y1 - 1991/11/1

N2 - The ergonomic design of manual materials handling tasks typically utilizes one or more of three approaches: biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical. Unfortunately, a comprehensive design is rarely obtained because of the difficulty of resolving the conflicting guidelines and criteria for each of the three approaches. This paper describes a methodology utilizing the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) process for resolving this conflict. This approach calculates the ratio of the contribution from each type of stress to an overall stress level as determined by the unacceptability of this stress to the user. An example is presented to demonstrate this technique.

AB - The ergonomic design of manual materials handling tasks typically utilizes one or more of three approaches: biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical. Unfortunately, a comprehensive design is rarely obtained because of the difficulty of resolving the conflicting guidelines and criteria for each of the three approaches. This paper describes a methodology utilizing the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) process for resolving this conflict. This approach calculates the ratio of the contribution from each type of stress to an overall stress level as determined by the unacceptability of this stress to the user. An example is presented to demonstrate this technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026261738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026261738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1800102

AN - SCOPUS:0026261738

VL - 34

SP - 1351

EP - 1356

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 11

ER -